Eighteen Abbreviated Histories of Ancient China (十八史略) was written by Zeng Xian Zhi (曾先之) of the Yuan (元) dynasty. Later, the history of the Yuan dynasty was added to it and so the book eventually got to contain nineteen abbreviated hi...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100283851
2014
-
900
KCI등재
학술저널
123-146(24쪽)
6
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Eighteen Abbreviated Histories of Ancient China (十八史略) was written by Zeng Xian Zhi (曾先之) of the Yuan (元) dynasty. Later, the history of the Yuan dynasty was added to it and so the book eventually got to contain nineteen abbreviated hi...
Eighteen Abbreviated Histories of Ancient China (十八史略) was written by Zeng Xian Zhi (曾先之) of the Yuan (元) dynasty. Later, the history of the Yuan dynasty was added to it and so the book eventually got to contain nineteen abbreviated histories of China. Both were imported in Chosun. But mentions about the Zeng’s original version are found only in the Early Chosun period records. The so-called Saryak (史略) came to mean the extended version, Nineteen Abbreviated Histories of Ancient China (十九史略), in late Chosun period. Although the origin of both the Eighteen and the Nineteen was China, they were not popular in their home country. Instead, they gained fame in Korea and Japan. The Eighteen were constantly and widely read in Japan and the Nineteen after in Korea. In Chosun, a large quantity of the Nineteen was published as government publication. However, its commercial woodblock printed version began to appear from the 19th century. Although the government publication version usually published as seven or eight volumes as a whole, it seems that the commercial book makers made a different decision. Except a few cases, most of the remaining commercial versions only contain the first volume of the entire volume. The reason why they did not published the entire volume was related to Seodang education. The Nineteen was widely read as a Seodang text book but since the education did not go beyond the Three Kingdoms, which was about Volume Three, there was not so much demand for further volumes. The aim of this paper is to provide a list of the commercial woodblock printed version of the Nineteen with special attention to the publication of the first volume. I have collected more than thirty different versions of the first volume of the Nineteen and classified them. Since there is not even a list of Classical Chinese woodblock printings, this paper would be a stepping stone to the research in this field.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김동욱, "한글소설 방각본의 성립에 대하여" 서울특별시 1960
2 강명관, "조선시대 책과 지식의 역사" 천년의상상 2014
3 이용길, "조선시대 서당의 교재에 대한 고찰" 원광대학교 교육문제연구소 22 : 2003
4 류탁일, "완판 방각소설의 문헌학적 연구" 학문사 1981
5 김윤수, "십구사략의 원류와 한국적 전개(하)" 한국서지학회 (7) : 1992
6 김윤수, "십구사략의 원류와 한국적 전개(상)" 한국서지학회 (6) : 1991
7 백두현, "십구사략언해" 역락 2003
8 권오석, "서당교재에 관한 서지적 연구" 서지학회 10 : 1994
9 김동욱, "방각본에 대하여" 연세대학교 동방학연구소 11 : 1970
10 김윤수, "泰仁坊刻本 <詳說古文眞寶大全>과 <史要聚選>" (5, 6) : 1990
1 김동욱, "한글소설 방각본의 성립에 대하여" 서울특별시 1960
2 강명관, "조선시대 책과 지식의 역사" 천년의상상 2014
3 이용길, "조선시대 서당의 교재에 대한 고찰" 원광대학교 교육문제연구소 22 : 2003
4 류탁일, "완판 방각소설의 문헌학적 연구" 학문사 1981
5 김윤수, "십구사략의 원류와 한국적 전개(하)" 한국서지학회 (7) : 1992
6 김윤수, "십구사략의 원류와 한국적 전개(상)" 한국서지학회 (6) : 1991
7 백두현, "십구사략언해" 역락 2003
8 권오석, "서당교재에 관한 서지적 연구" 서지학회 10 : 1994
9 김동욱, "방각본에 대하여" 연세대학교 동방학연구소 11 : 1970
10 김윤수, "泰仁坊刻本 <詳說古文眞寶大全>과 <史要聚選>" (5, 6) : 1990
11 배현숙, "朝鮮朝 書堂의 書籍 刊行과 收藏에 관한 硏究" 한국서지학회 (35) : 5-40, 2006
12 김중권, "朝鮮朝 仁宗의 讀書歷에 관한 考察 - 世子時節을 中心으로 -" 한국서지학회 (46) : 267-298, 2010
13 Richard Rutt, "The Chinese Learning and Pleasures of a Country Scholar, An account of traditional Chinese studies in rural Korea" The Korea Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 36 : 1960
일제시기 재해문제와 자선,기부문화 -전통,근대화,공공성-
『하므렡』의 번역자 설정식과 연희전문 문과의 영어영문학 교육
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2014-01-20 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> THE DONG BANG HAK CHI | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.23 | 1.23 | 1.13 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.06 | 0.97 | 2.154 | 0.15 |