RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    뉴타운개발사업의 문제점과 개선 방안에 관한 연구 : 은평뉴타운 개발 사례를 중심으로 = A study on Issues and Action Plans of New Town Project : Focused on Eunpyeong New Town Development Case

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11632840

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    “New Town project” refers to preparation plan for upgrading total city function to level of equal living class.
    Existing inner-city redevelopment was carried out in such a small scale by private company causing the lack of basic city infrastructures, like road construction, schools, lands, etc. that it was impossible to develop large-scale undeveloped area and downtown area with both commercial and private purposes
    Hereupon, the necessity which will reorganize the house defective area efficiently and systematically mixing various city maintenance and development method based on present laws such as Urban and Living Environment Improvement Act and Urban Development Act has become salient.
    New Town project does not stop at simply maintaining the city structure or improving it but goes on to make “human-oriented community” where a variety of classes and age groups coexist and create “21stcentury high-quality well-being living space” that will be harmonious city community.
    Although New Town project is important in balanced development of both Gangnam and Gangbook areas, it also has its significance in achieving the transition from region-level development method to class-level. Therefore, long-term plan is required. Even if these conditions are met and people are well-informed and participate actively, people’s participation will not make smooth progress unless public organizations and private institutions, the main bodies of the plan, recognize the importance of people participation and have undemocratic and close-minded attitude. Accordingly, these main bodies must fully understand people’s opinion.
    Eunpyeong is closely located to Bukhan-san Natioal Park which serves as a lung of Seoul. Environmental research for a massive development plan around this area should be accomplished. However, the research on environmental impact of development plan on Changreung-chun where fresh water runs all-year long, Jingwan Park, Suhoreung Park, and Galhyun Park, has stopped at a perfunctory level. In turn, the environmental office, in charge of monitoring these issues, pre-approved the development plan and approved complementary impact evaluation afterwards. Whether the environmental impact evaluation can be complemented should be scrutinized.
    New Town project aims to make a better place to live; however, in reality, personal and economic benefits of reconstruction promotion plan are often regarded more important than the issue of quality of living and majority’s opinion. As well, they are acting as obstacle to establishing and executing New Town project. It is important for New Town project to establish the belief that the community is doing the work for the good of its dwellers. People’s opinion, inquiries, and suggestions must be heard, reviewed in a timely manner to apply their ideas into action.
    I would like to conclude this research hoping that, above all, Eunpyoung New Town will create harmony between man and nature, improve quality of life for its inhabitants and become a better place to live.
    번역하기

    “New Town project” refers to preparation plan for upgrading total city function to level of equal living class. Existing inner-city redevelopment was carried out in such a small scale by private company causing the lack of basic city infrastructu...

    “New Town project” refers to preparation plan for upgrading total city function to level of equal living class.
    Existing inner-city redevelopment was carried out in such a small scale by private company causing the lack of basic city infrastructures, like road construction, schools, lands, etc. that it was impossible to develop large-scale undeveloped area and downtown area with both commercial and private purposes
    Hereupon, the necessity which will reorganize the house defective area efficiently and systematically mixing various city maintenance and development method based on present laws such as Urban and Living Environment Improvement Act and Urban Development Act has become salient.
    New Town project does not stop at simply maintaining the city structure or improving it but goes on to make “human-oriented community” where a variety of classes and age groups coexist and create “21stcentury high-quality well-being living space” that will be harmonious city community.
    Although New Town project is important in balanced development of both Gangnam and Gangbook areas, it also has its significance in achieving the transition from region-level development method to class-level. Therefore, long-term plan is required. Even if these conditions are met and people are well-informed and participate actively, people’s participation will not make smooth progress unless public organizations and private institutions, the main bodies of the plan, recognize the importance of people participation and have undemocratic and close-minded attitude. Accordingly, these main bodies must fully understand people’s opinion.
    Eunpyeong is closely located to Bukhan-san Natioal Park which serves as a lung of Seoul. Environmental research for a massive development plan around this area should be accomplished. However, the research on environmental impact of development plan on Changreung-chun where fresh water runs all-year long, Jingwan Park, Suhoreung Park, and Galhyun Park, has stopped at a perfunctory level. In turn, the environmental office, in charge of monitoring these issues, pre-approved the development plan and approved complementary impact evaluation afterwards. Whether the environmental impact evaluation can be complemented should be scrutinized.
    New Town project aims to make a better place to live; however, in reality, personal and economic benefits of reconstruction promotion plan are often regarded more important than the issue of quality of living and majority’s opinion. As well, they are acting as obstacle to establishing and executing New Town project. It is important for New Town project to establish the belief that the community is doing the work for the good of its dwellers. People’s opinion, inquiries, and suggestions must be heard, reviewed in a timely manner to apply their ideas into action.
    I would like to conclude this research hoping that, above all, Eunpyoung New Town will create harmony between man and nature, improve quality of life for its inhabitants and become a better place to live.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장. 서론 = 1
    • 제1절. 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
    • 제2절. 연구의 범위와 방법 = 3
    • 제2장. 뉴타운사업에 관한 이론적 고찰 = 6
    • 제1절. 뉴타운사업의 개념 = 6
    • 제1장. 서론 = 1
    • 제1절. 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
    • 제2절. 연구의 범위와 방법 = 3
    • 제2장. 뉴타운사업에 관한 이론적 고찰 = 6
    • 제1절. 뉴타운사업의 개념 = 6
    • 1. 뉴타운사업의 개념과 연혁 = 6
    • 2. 뉴타운사업과 U-City도입 = 12
    • 제2절. 커뮤니티 여건분석과 창의적인 뉴타운 구현 = 15
    • 1. 커뮤니티의 여건분석 = 15
    • 2. 창의적인 뉴타운 구현 = 21
    • 3. 뉴타운사업과 주민참여 = 24
    • 제3절. 주요국의 뉴타운개발 사례 = 27
    • 1. 일본의 뉴타운개발 사례 = 27
    • 2. 영국의 뉴타운개발 사례 = 32
    • 3. 미국의 뉴타운개발 사례 = 37
    • 4. 외국제도가 주는 시사점 = 39
    • 제3장. 뉴타운사업의 현황 및 추진 실태 분석 = 41
    • 제1절. 서울시 뉴타운사업 현황 = 41
    • 1. 뉴타운사업의 등장배경 = 41
    • 2. 뉴타운사업의 법적연혁 = 45
    • 3. 재정비 촉진사업의 현황과 서울시 뉴타운사업의 비교분석 = 54
    • 제2절. 서울시 뉴타운사업의 추진방식 및 과정 = 58
    • 1. 뉴타운사업의 추진방식 = 58
    • 2. 뉴타운사업의 추진과정 = 64
    • 제3절. 은평뉴타운 사업의 현황 및 실태 = 71
    • 1. 은평뉴타운사업의 현황 = 71
    • 2. 은평뉴타운의 입지적 환경 = 74
    • 3. 은평뉴타운의 실태 = 78
    • 제4장. 은평뉴타운의 문제점 및 개선 방안 = 85
    • 제1절. 문제점 = 85
    • 1. 원주민의 재정착률 저조 = 85
    • 2. 기반시설 부족 = 89
    • 3. = 교통문제90
    • 4. 재건축지역의 투기억제방안 = 92
    • 제2절. 개선방안 = 94
    • 1. 재정착률 제고방안 = 94
    • 2. 기반시설의 확충방안 = 107
    • 3. 교통대책 = 111
    • 4. 재건축지역의 토지 투기억제방안 = 113
    • 제5장. 결론 = 115
    • 참고문헌 = 118
    • ABSTRACT = 124
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼