RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      펠로폰네소스 전쟁을 통해 본 고전기 그리스 군사전략 = A Study on Ancient Greek Military Strategy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104463397

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper attempts to show that ancient Greeks had understood multi- dimensional military strategic concept which had been argued by Michael Howard in the 20th century. Unlike common understandings about strategic thoughts, this paper suggests that ancient Greeks had employed military strategy in conducting war.
      In the case of ground warfare, the Greeks preferred Phalanx formation based on its superior shock power and protection in consideration of technical dimension of strategy. At the same time, the Greeks had stuck to decisive battles in regard to heavy combat weight and the protection of warriors who were also important members of Greek city states. The idea of protecting its membership had strong connection with social dimension of the strategy.
      To conduct maritime warfare, Greeks at the ancient time constructed trireme fleets. Athens was eager to build fleets using abundant social and financial resources. This can be regarded that Athenians had good conditions to have maritime forces in terms of social dimension of the strategy. At the same time, the Greeks sought decisive battles focusing on operational dimension of the strategy. In addition, Pericles showed that he understood logistic and social dimension of the strategy in pursuing his unique defense strategy.
      In conclusion, ancient Greeks were well aware of multi-dimensions of military strategy and exploited those concepts adroitly. In this sense, studies on the origin of military strategy should go back to the time of the ancient Greeks rather than staying at modern times. (Korea National Defense University)
      번역하기

      This paper attempts to show that ancient Greeks had understood multi- dimensional military strategic concept which had been argued by Michael Howard in the 20th century. Unlike common understandings about strategic thoughts, this paper suggests that a...

      This paper attempts to show that ancient Greeks had understood multi- dimensional military strategic concept which had been argued by Michael Howard in the 20th century. Unlike common understandings about strategic thoughts, this paper suggests that ancient Greeks had employed military strategy in conducting war.
      In the case of ground warfare, the Greeks preferred Phalanx formation based on its superior shock power and protection in consideration of technical dimension of strategy. At the same time, the Greeks had stuck to decisive battles in regard to heavy combat weight and the protection of warriors who were also important members of Greek city states. The idea of protecting its membership had strong connection with social dimension of the strategy.
      To conduct maritime warfare, Greeks at the ancient time constructed trireme fleets. Athens was eager to build fleets using abundant social and financial resources. This can be regarded that Athenians had good conditions to have maritime forces in terms of social dimension of the strategy. At the same time, the Greeks sought decisive battles focusing on operational dimension of the strategy. In addition, Pericles showed that he understood logistic and social dimension of the strategy in pursuing his unique defense strategy.
      In conclusion, ancient Greeks were well aware of multi-dimensions of military strategy and exploited those concepts adroitly. In this sense, studies on the origin of military strategy should go back to the time of the ancient Greeks rather than staying at modern times. (Korea National Defense University)

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 도널드 케이건, "펠로폰네소스 전쟁사" 까치 2007

      2 손경호, "펠로폰네소스 전쟁기 페리클레스의 전략에 관한 고찰" 한국서양문화사학회 (21) : 1-26, 2009

      3 전윤재, "전투함과 항재자의 해군사" 군사연구 2009

      4 베리 스트라우스, "세계의 역사를 바꾼 전쟁 살라미스 해전" 갈라파고서 2004

      5 기우셉 피오라반조, "세계사 속의 해전" 신서원 2006

      6 한스 델브뤽, "병법사" 육군사관학교 화랑대연구소 2006

      7 손경호, "고전기 그리스에서 나타난 경보병의 발달과 그 한계" 한국서양사학회 (107) : 33-54, 2010

      8 Warry, John, "Warfare in the Classical World" Oklahoma 2006

      9 Hanson, Victor D, "The Western Way of War" University of California Press 1989

      10 Machiavelli, Niccolo, "The Prince" Bantam Classic 1966

      1 도널드 케이건, "펠로폰네소스 전쟁사" 까치 2007

      2 손경호, "펠로폰네소스 전쟁기 페리클레스의 전략에 관한 고찰" 한국서양문화사학회 (21) : 1-26, 2009

      3 전윤재, "전투함과 항재자의 해군사" 군사연구 2009

      4 베리 스트라우스, "세계의 역사를 바꾼 전쟁 살라미스 해전" 갈라파고서 2004

      5 기우셉 피오라반조, "세계사 속의 해전" 신서원 2006

      6 한스 델브뤽, "병법사" 육군사관학교 화랑대연구소 2006

      7 손경호, "고전기 그리스에서 나타난 경보병의 발달과 그 한계" 한국서양사학회 (107) : 33-54, 2010

      8 Warry, John, "Warfare in the Classical World" Oklahoma 2006

      9 Hanson, Victor D, "The Western Way of War" University of California Press 1989

      10 Machiavelli, Niccolo, "The Prince" Bantam Classic 1966

      11 Machiavelli, Niccolo, "The Prince" New

      12 Thucydides, "The Peloponnesian War"

      13 Herodotus, "The Histories"

      14 Adcock, F. E., "The Greek And Macedonian War" University of California Press 1957

      15 Howard, Michael, "The Forgotten Dimensions of Strategy, In Military Strategy: Theory And Application, Carlisle Barracks" U.S. Army War College 1982

      16 Liddell Hart, B. H, "Strategy" Praeger Publishers 1967

      17 Clausewitz, Carl von, "On War" Princeton Unversity Press 1984

      18 Vegetius, "On Roman Military Matters"

      19 Earle, Edward M, "Makers of Modern Strategy: Military Thought from Machiavelli to Hitler" Princeton University Press 1943

      20 Hanson, Victor D, "Makers of Ancient Strategy" Princeton University Press 2010

      21 Gilbert, Felix, "Machiavelli: The Renaissance of the Art of War, In Makers of Modern Strategy: from Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age" Princeton University Press 1986

      22 "International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 15" The Macmilland Co., & The Free Press 1974

      23 Livy, Titus, "History of Rome"

      24 Polybius, "Histories"

      25 Hanson, Victor D, "Carnage And Culture" Anchor Books 2001

      26 Gat, Azar, "A History of Military Thought" Oxford University Press 2001

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-12-28 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국서양문화사학회 -> 한국세계문화사학회
      영문명 : The Korean Society Of Western Civilization -> Korea Association of World History and Culture
      KCI등재
      2018-12-27 학술지명변경 한글명 : 서양 역사와 문화 연구 -> 세계 역사와 문화 연구
      외국어명 : Journal of Western History and Culture -> World History and Culture
      KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-12-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 서양사학연구 -> 서양 역사와 문화 연구
      외국어명 : Journal of Western History -> Journal of Western History and Culture
      KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.3 0.3 0.34
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.32 0.29 0.671 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼