RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    1980년 전후 유럽 내의 독일 미술 전시들, 무엇을 어떻게 무대에 올렸는가? = What and how staged the exhibitions of German new art in Europe about 1980?

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76559395

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    During some years around 1980, a series of exhibitions of European art were shown in England, Netherlands, France and West Germany. These exhibitions tried to rewrite or to revaluate the European art of the 20th century including the newest one. However the American art critics like Benjamin D. H. Buchloh and Douglas Crimp who wrote for the renowned marxist art magazine October attacked vehemently those exhibitions as strateges to bring the new German art to the international artstage and artmarket. The “new” German art was for them above all the figurative painting that they called as Neoexpressionism.
    The marxist critics saw the painting as a medium which has represented the bourgeois ideology after its birth. They declared the figurative painting as regressive, even fascist. Thus they favoured Photography and the Conceptual Art which were considerd as main art streams in the last two decades before the 80s while the traditional media painting was relatively retreated in the big international exibition events. Thus they defined the rise of painting in the 80s as “return of painting”. Moreover they brought to related the rise of the expressionist painting in Germany with the rise of the economic reconstruction of that country after the Ⅱ World War.
    But the authentic reason of their hostility to the rise of the new German painting lay in the angst about the ‘return’ of the European art tradition and its ‘hegemony’ in art world. It was also the fear about the German Historicism and the ‘power’ of the ‘spirit’, namely ‘Geist’.
    That angst of the American critics was not without reason. The rise of “new” German art and the ‘return’ of the painting were developed and resulted from various projects of specific exhibition-makers in Europe.
    The first exhibition of this symptom was the solo exhibition of Georg Baselitz organized in 1979 by a Dutchman, Rudi Fuchs, who three years later became a general director for the 7th Kassel documenta. The British capital London played very important role to bring the new German art to the international art stage. The most effectful event of the shows was the “A New Spirit in Painting” which was organized by Nicolas Serota, Norman Rosenthal and a in Berlin living Greek curator Christos Joachimides at the Royal Academy of Arts, London in 1981. The last two curators organized together in 1982 the legendary exhibition “Zeitgeist” at the Martin-Gropius-Bau in Berlin. The process of the rise of the new German art was supported by various international art exhibitions in Europe such as the 39th Venice Biennale in 1980, the 7th Kassel documenta in 1982, the series big exhibitions at the Centre de Pompidou in Paris etc.
    Art works as well as exhibitions are never only that are seen. An art work is never aseptic. The space or site of exhibition, and the order of display are never neutral. They all represent a certain ideology of their producers or institutions just like art criticism. The art works, exhibitions and art criticisms in the symptom of the ‘return’ of the painting in Germany around 1980 demonstrate such institutional concept of museum which was born after the Enlightenment.
    In this paper I showed how, why and by whom the new German painting was brought to the international art stage, and why and how it was criticized.
    번역하기

    During some years around 1980, a series of exhibitions of European art were shown in England, Netherlands, France and West Germany. These exhibitions tried to rewrite or to revaluate the European art of the 20th century including the newest one. Howev...

    During some years around 1980, a series of exhibitions of European art were shown in England, Netherlands, France and West Germany. These exhibitions tried to rewrite or to revaluate the European art of the 20th century including the newest one. However the American art critics like Benjamin D. H. Buchloh and Douglas Crimp who wrote for the renowned marxist art magazine October attacked vehemently those exhibitions as strateges to bring the new German art to the international artstage and artmarket. The “new” German art was for them above all the figurative painting that they called as Neoexpressionism.
    The marxist critics saw the painting as a medium which has represented the bourgeois ideology after its birth. They declared the figurative painting as regressive, even fascist. Thus they favoured Photography and the Conceptual Art which were considerd as main art streams in the last two decades before the 80s while the traditional media painting was relatively retreated in the big international exibition events. Thus they defined the rise of painting in the 80s as “return of painting”. Moreover they brought to related the rise of the expressionist painting in Germany with the rise of the economic reconstruction of that country after the Ⅱ World War.
    But the authentic reason of their hostility to the rise of the new German painting lay in the angst about the ‘return’ of the European art tradition and its ‘hegemony’ in art world. It was also the fear about the German Historicism and the ‘power’ of the ‘spirit’, namely ‘Geist’.
    That angst of the American critics was not without reason. The rise of “new” German art and the ‘return’ of the painting were developed and resulted from various projects of specific exhibition-makers in Europe.
    The first exhibition of this symptom was the solo exhibition of Georg Baselitz organized in 1979 by a Dutchman, Rudi Fuchs, who three years later became a general director for the 7th Kassel documenta. The British capital London played very important role to bring the new German art to the international art stage. The most effectful event of the shows was the “A New Spirit in Painting” which was organized by Nicolas Serota, Norman Rosenthal and a in Berlin living Greek curator Christos Joachimides at the Royal Academy of Arts, London in 1981. The last two curators organized together in 1982 the legendary exhibition “Zeitgeist” at the Martin-Gropius-Bau in Berlin. The process of the rise of the new German art was supported by various international art exhibitions in Europe such as the 39th Venice Biennale in 1980, the 7th Kassel documenta in 1982, the series big exhibitions at the Centre de Pompidou in Paris etc.
    Art works as well as exhibitions are never only that are seen. An art work is never aseptic. The space or site of exhibition, and the order of display are never neutral. They all represent a certain ideology of their producers or institutions just like art criticism. The art works, exhibitions and art criticisms in the symptom of the ‘return’ of the painting in Germany around 1980 demonstrate such institutional concept of museum which was born after the Enlightenment.
    In this paper I showed how, why and by whom the new German painting was brought to the international art stage, and why and how it was criticized.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 독일의 형상적 회화와 그것에 대한 비판: “역사주의” vs 아방가르디즘
    • Ⅱ. 회화에 집중된 유럽 전시들 양상과 의도
    • Ⅲ. 독일 회화에 대한 비판과 옹호의 입장
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 독일의 형상적 회화와 그것에 대한 비판: “역사주의” vs 아방가르디즘
    • Ⅱ. 회화에 집중된 유럽 전시들 양상과 의도
    • Ⅲ. 독일 회화에 대한 비판과 옹호의 입장
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.71 0.71 0.71
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.56 0.5 1.497 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼