RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      현대문학분야 연구업적의 평가  :  현대문학연구의 학적 구축을 위하여 Toward the Constrution of Korean Modern Literary Study as a Science = The Evaluation in the Field of Korean Nodern Literary Study

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Even today, Korean modern literary study doesn't stand out as a science inspite of quantitative expansion. Why? Mainly due to the confusion of literary study and literary criticism. To avoid it, the former which has usually followed the latter had better investigate the latter on the contrary. Perhaps this is the starting point of the construction of a science. So impartial evaluation of the results is a serious question. First of all, the general standard which is laid more stress on papers than books must be reconsidered. And only the papers which are printed in the academic journals authorized by Korea Research Foundation are estimated highly. But it's based on the fulfillment of the formal items. The quality of a paper must be evaluated adequately.
      Secondly, the problem of international journals. Suddenly the list of A&HCI stands in the footlight. The submission to the West originated from the department of (natural) sciences and engineerings is sweeping over the department of humanities, and the Koreanology at last. Asking to examine ourselves, we make a hurry to publish international journals of Korean Literature in Korea.
      번역하기

      Even today, Korean modern literary study doesn't stand out as a science inspite of quantitative expansion. Why? Mainly due to the confusion of literary study and literary criticism. To avoid it, the former which has usually followed the latter had bet...

      Even today, Korean modern literary study doesn't stand out as a science inspite of quantitative expansion. Why? Mainly due to the confusion of literary study and literary criticism. To avoid it, the former which has usually followed the latter had better investigate the latter on the contrary. Perhaps this is the starting point of the construction of a science. So impartial evaluation of the results is a serious question. First of all, the general standard which is laid more stress on papers than books must be reconsidered. And only the papers which are printed in the academic journals authorized by Korea Research Foundation are estimated highly. But it's based on the fulfillment of the formal items. The quality of a paper must be evaluated adequately.
      Secondly, the problem of international journals. Suddenly the list of A&HCI stands in the footlight. The submission to the West originated from the department of (natural) sciences and engineerings is sweeping over the department of humanities, and the Koreanology at last. Asking to examine ourselves, we make a hurry to publish international journals of Korean Literature in Korea.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 연구와 비평
      • 2. 평가의 기준들
      • 3. 평가의 실제
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      • 1. 연구와 비평
      • 2. 평가의 기준들
      • 3. 평가의 실제
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼