RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    대학교수의 교육역할 진단도구 타당화 연구 = Study on the Validity of Diagnostic Tool for Professors` Educational Role

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99895314

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study verified the validity of diagnostic tool for professors` educational role, the purpose of which was to confirm the dimensions of educational role. The study also compared the differences on the professors` educational role between professors and students and analyzed satisfaction of the professors` educational role by students-related variables. Subjects participated in the study were 132 college professors and 507 college students. The results of the study are as follows:First, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis that conducted to validate the diagnostic tool for professors` educational role showed that four sub-roles were confirmed including contents expert, instructional designer, speaker, and facilitator.Second, as a result of analysis on performance of the professors` educational role, statistically significant difference on the satisfaction of the professors` educational role between professors and students was found in contents expert role. Professors had higher awareness on contents expert role than that of students.Third, as a result of analysis on the satisfaction of the professors` educational role among students -related variables, statistically significant difference on the satisfaction of the professors` educational role was found in grade and college they belong to. Higher grade students were more satisfied with the role of instructional designer than lower grade ones. Students who belong to the college of law were less satisfied with the performance of the professors` educational role than those of other colleges
    번역하기

    This study verified the validity of diagnostic tool for professors` educational role, the purpose of which was to confirm the dimensions of educational role. The study also compared the differences on the professors` educational role between professor...

    This study verified the validity of diagnostic tool for professors` educational role, the purpose of which was to confirm the dimensions of educational role. The study also compared the differences on the professors` educational role between professors and students and analyzed satisfaction of the professors` educational role by students-related variables. Subjects participated in the study were 132 college professors and 507 college students. The results of the study are as follows:First, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis that conducted to validate the diagnostic tool for professors` educational role showed that four sub-roles were confirmed including contents expert, instructional designer, speaker, and facilitator.Second, as a result of analysis on performance of the professors` educational role, statistically significant difference on the satisfaction of the professors` educational role between professors and students was found in contents expert role. Professors had higher awareness on contents expert role than that of students.Third, as a result of analysis on the satisfaction of the professors` educational role among students -related variables, statistically significant difference on the satisfaction of the professors` educational role was found in grade and college they belong to. Higher grade students were more satisfied with the role of instructional designer than lower grade ones. Students who belong to the college of law were less satisfied with the performance of the professors` educational role than those of other colleges

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 권성호, "하드웨어는 부드럽게 소프트웨어는 단단하게" 양서원 2000

    2 조벽, "잘 가르치는 것의 중요성. 한양대 뉴스레터"

    3 조규락, "수업개선을 원한다면: 훌륭한 교수자의 조건. 대구보건대학 교수법 특강자료"

    4 최미나, "대학에서의 교수역량 분석을 통한 효과적인 교수역량 진단 방안 탐색" 144-164, 2006

    5 지은림, "대학 교수자를 위한 강의자가진단도구 개발의타당화 및 관련변인 분석" 한국교육평가학회 19 (19): 51-72, 2006

    6 임우섭, "대학 교수의 핵심 강의역량 분석" 한국교육행정학회 25 (25): 413-434, 2007

    7 양은하, "교수역량 증진을 위한 변화필요도분석" 한국교육공학회 26 (26): 25-52, 2010

    8 Tigelaar, D. E, "The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education" 48 (48): 253-268, 2004

    9 Burden, P. R, "Methods for effective teaching" Pearson Education, Inc 2003

    10 Beerens, D. R, "Evaluation teachers for professional growth" Corwin 2000

    1 권성호, "하드웨어는 부드럽게 소프트웨어는 단단하게" 양서원 2000

    2 조벽, "잘 가르치는 것의 중요성. 한양대 뉴스레터"

    3 조규락, "수업개선을 원한다면: 훌륭한 교수자의 조건. 대구보건대학 교수법 특강자료"

    4 최미나, "대학에서의 교수역량 분석을 통한 효과적인 교수역량 진단 방안 탐색" 144-164, 2006

    5 지은림, "대학 교수자를 위한 강의자가진단도구 개발의타당화 및 관련변인 분석" 한국교육평가학회 19 (19): 51-72, 2006

    6 임우섭, "대학 교수의 핵심 강의역량 분석" 한국교육행정학회 25 (25): 413-434, 2007

    7 양은하, "교수역량 증진을 위한 변화필요도분석" 한국교육공학회 26 (26): 25-52, 2010

    8 Tigelaar, D. E, "The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education" 48 (48): 253-268, 2004

    9 Burden, P. R, "Methods for effective teaching" Pearson Education, Inc 2003

    10 Beerens, D. R, "Evaluation teachers for professional growth" Corwin 2000

    11 Stritter, F. T, "Determining essential faculty competencies" 3 (3): 232-238, 1991

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-04-20 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Association Of Educational Information & Broadcasting -> Korea Association for Educational Information and Media KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.59 1.59 1.95
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2 1.96 2.299 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼