RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Comparison of the Amount of Drainage in 3 Acellular Dermal Matrices in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105114563

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background Acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted breast reconstruction has gained popularity because it has several advantages. Some studies have reported that the use of ADM was strongly associated with postoperative complications, especially seroma formation. We performed direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using 3 types of human allograft products (CGDerm®, AlloDerm®, and MegaDerm®). The purpose of this study was to obtain information useful for the selection of an ADM product by comparing the amount of collected serum and the maintenance period of the drain.
      Methods Seventy-three patients with breast cancer who underwent ADM-assisted implant breast reconstruction between March 2011 and January 2016 were included in this study. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the type of ADM that was used. The demographic characteristics collected were: age, body mass index (BMI), breast reconstruction location, smoking history, axillary dissection, comorbidities (such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus [DM]), breast implant size, breast implant type, amount of ADM, the total amount of serum that was collected in the drain, and the maintenance period of the drain.
      Results We obtained significant results after adjusting for variables including age, BMI, DM, axillary dissection, ADM amount, and breast implant size. Compared to AlloDerm, MegaDerm showed a significantly smaller amount of total drained serum and a significantly shorter drain maintenance period.
      Conclusions The use of MegaDerm led to smaller amounts of drained serum and a shorter drain maintenance period than when AlloDerm was used. In contrast, no significant differences were found between CGDerm and AlloDerm, or between CGDerm and MegaDerm.
      번역하기

      Background Acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted breast reconstruction has gained popularity because it has several advantages. Some studies have reported that the use of ADM was strongly associated with postoperative complications, especially seroma...

      Background Acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted breast reconstruction has gained popularity because it has several advantages. Some studies have reported that the use of ADM was strongly associated with postoperative complications, especially seroma formation. We performed direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using 3 types of human allograft products (CGDerm®, AlloDerm®, and MegaDerm®). The purpose of this study was to obtain information useful for the selection of an ADM product by comparing the amount of collected serum and the maintenance period of the drain.
      Methods Seventy-three patients with breast cancer who underwent ADM-assisted implant breast reconstruction between March 2011 and January 2016 were included in this study. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the type of ADM that was used. The demographic characteristics collected were: age, body mass index (BMI), breast reconstruction location, smoking history, axillary dissection, comorbidities (such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus [DM]), breast implant size, breast implant type, amount of ADM, the total amount of serum that was collected in the drain, and the maintenance period of the drain.
      Results We obtained significant results after adjusting for variables including age, BMI, DM, axillary dissection, ADM amount, and breast implant size. Compared to AlloDerm, MegaDerm showed a significantly smaller amount of total drained serum and a significantly shorter drain maintenance period.
      Conclusions The use of MegaDerm led to smaller amounts of drained serum and a shorter drain maintenance period than when AlloDerm was used. In contrast, no significant differences were found between CGDerm and AlloDerm, or between CGDerm and MegaDerm.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Lanier ST, "The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction" 64 : 674-678, 2010

      2 Mendenhall SD, "The BREASTrial: stage I. Outcomes from the time of tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix placement to definitive reconstruction" 135 : e29-42e, 2015

      3 Moyer KE, "Technique for seroma drainage in implant-based breast reconstruction" 65 : 1614-1617, 2012

      4 Weichman KE, "Sterile “ready-to-use” AlloDerm decreases postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix" 132 : 725-736, 2013

      5 Woerdeman LA, "Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction by use of implants: an assessment of risk factors for complications and cancer control in 120 patients" 118 : 321-330, 2006

      6 Jordan SW, "Seroma in prosthetic breast reconstruction" 137 : 1104-1116, 2016

      7 Colwell AS, "Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs" 128 : 1170-1178, 2011

      8 Neaman KC, "Outcomes of traditional cosmetic abdominoplasty in a community setting: a retrospective analysis of 1008 patients" 131 : 403e-410e, 2013

      9 Breuing KH, "Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction" 59 : 250-255, 2007

      10 Chun YS, "Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications" 125 : 429-436, 2010

      1 Lanier ST, "The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction" 64 : 674-678, 2010

      2 Mendenhall SD, "The BREASTrial: stage I. Outcomes from the time of tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix placement to definitive reconstruction" 135 : e29-42e, 2015

      3 Moyer KE, "Technique for seroma drainage in implant-based breast reconstruction" 65 : 1614-1617, 2012

      4 Weichman KE, "Sterile “ready-to-use” AlloDerm decreases postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix" 132 : 725-736, 2013

      5 Woerdeman LA, "Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction by use of implants: an assessment of risk factors for complications and cancer control in 120 patients" 118 : 321-330, 2006

      6 Jordan SW, "Seroma in prosthetic breast reconstruction" 137 : 1104-1116, 2016

      7 Colwell AS, "Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs" 128 : 1170-1178, 2011

      8 Neaman KC, "Outcomes of traditional cosmetic abdominoplasty in a community setting: a retrospective analysis of 1008 patients" 131 : 403e-410e, 2013

      9 Breuing KH, "Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction" 59 : 250-255, 2007

      10 Chun YS, "Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications" 125 : 429-436, 2010

      11 Breuing KH, "Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings" 55 : 232-239, 2005

      12 Parks JW, "Human acellular dermis versus no acellular dermis in tissue expansion breast reconstruction" 130 : 739-746, 2012

      13 Glenda Giorgia Caputo, "Daily Serum Collection after Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Breast Reconstruction" 대한성형외과학회 42 (42): 321-326, 2015

      14 Duncan DI, "Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis" 21 : 81-84, 2001

      15 Israeli R, "Complications of acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery" 130 : 159s-172s, 2012

      16 Hoppe IC, "Complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review and meta-analysis" 11 : e40-, 2011

      17 Yuen JC, "Comparison between freeze-dried and ready-to-use AlloDerm in alloplastic breast reconstruction" 2 : e119-, 2014

      18 Lee JH, "Characterization and tissue incorporation of cross-linked human acellular dermal matrix" 44 : 195-205, 2015

      19 Michelotti BF, "Analysis of clinically significant seroma formation in breast reconstruction using acellular dermal grafts" 71 : 274-277, 2013

      20 Glasberg SB, "AlloDerm and Strattice in breast reconstruction: a comparison and techniques for optimizing outcomes" 129 : 1223-1233, 2012

      21 Sbitany H, "Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity" 128 : 1162-1169, 2011

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2012-07-12 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한미용성형외과학회지 -> Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery KCI등재
      2011-06-28 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery -> Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.07 0.07 0.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.06 0.05 0.441 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼