파괴적 기술 분야에 대한 표준화 전략 연구 = 전문가 델파이 조사를 중심으로

국문 초록 (Abstract)

파괴적 기술(disruptive technology)은 기존 산업, 타 산업 그리고 소비자에게까지 미치는 파급력으로 인해 국내외 산업계, 표준화기구, 학계, 정부 및 규제기관 등의 관심이 집중되고 있다. 새로운 기술을 주도하는 기업들은 자사의 기술을 표준, 특히 국제표준으로 만듦으로써 세계 시장을 선점하고자 하지만 국제 표준화기구 등을 통한 공식적인 표준화는 급격한 기술 및 시장 변화에 대응하는 데에 시간이 많이 소요되는 어려움이 있어 공적 표준화기구를 우회하는 방법들이 선호되고 있다. 파괴적 기술분야에서 여러 규모의 기업들과 다양한 이해관계자들이 표준이 가져다주는 기술 개발 및 확산의 혜택을 얻기 위해서는 공적 표준화기구에서의 결집된 표준 제정의 노력이 필요하다. 따라서 본 연구는 파괴적 기술 분야의 표준화에 대해 공적 표준화기구의 역할이 시장 메커니즘에 비해 미미한 이유가 무엇인지 분석하고자 전문가 델파이 조사를 수행하였다. 이를 통해 전문가들은 파괴적 기술의 핵심적 특성을 소비자의 행동 및 습관을 변화시켜 새로운 시장을 창출하고 기존 시장의 경쟁 질서를 변화시키는 것으로 인식하고 있음을 발견하였다. 이러한 특성을 반영하여 유연하고 신속한 표준화가 핵심적이라는 점이 전문가들이 공유하는 의견으로 드러났다. 또한, 표준화 활동과 기업의 이윤창출과의 연결고리 부재에 대한 인식이 표준화 참여를 저해하는 요인으로 작용하고 있음을 발견하였다. 델파이 조사 결과를 분석하여 공적 표준화기구의 차원과 표준화 정책적 측면에서 시사점을 도출하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Disruptive technology is increasingly gaining attention by industries, standards development organizations (SDOs), academia, government and regulatory bodies due to its massive scope of impact on the incumbents and consumers. Companies that take a lead in new technologies intend to dominate the global market by making their technologies into an international standard. However, they tend to seek ways of by-passing the slow procedures of formal SDOs that often hinder prompt action in response to rapid changes in technology and market situations. In the area of disruptive technologies, there is a need to harmonize standardization efforts in formal SDOs for various companies and stakeholders to reap the benefits of technological development and diffusion of innovation.
This paper examines the reasons why standardization is more active using market-based mechanisms than through formal SDOs for disruptive technologies. We conducted a Delphi study to investigate standardization strategies in the area of disruptive technologies. This research found that experts understood the core element of disruptive technologies as creating new markets and changing the competition basis in existing industries through the transformation of consumers’ behavior. Based on these core characteristics, experts agreed that flexibility and speed are the most important factors for standardization. Results also show that the perception that standardization activities are not directly connected to companies" profit-making is the key barrier to links between research and companies’ participation in standardization. This research provides implications for formal SDOs and policymakers.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 국문요약
• ABSTRACT
• I. 서론
• II. 선행연구
• III. 연구방법
• IV. 분석결과
• V. 표준화 전략에 대한 시사점
• VI. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김동휴, "표준화 정책 측면에서 모듈성 연구: 전자 산업과자동차 산업 비교 분석" 기술경영경제학회 23 (23): 169-200, 2015

2 김동일, "스마트 미디어 중독 개념 및 특성 분석 델파이 연구" 교육연구소 14 (14): 49-71, 2013

3 삼성경제연구소, "미래 산업을 바꿀 7大 파괴적 혁신 기술" 1-22, 2013

4 이건, "국내 ICT산업정책의 방향성 탐색을 위한 전문가 델파이 연구" 한국행정연구소 51 (51): 179-206, 2013

5 IEC, "ahG 58"

6 Swann, G. M. P., "Why do Standards Enable and Constrain Innovation?" University of Lausanne 2010

7 Christensen, C. M., "What is Disruptive Innovation?" 93 (93): 44-53, 2015

8 Keil, M., "Understanding the Most Critical Skills for Managing IT Projects : A Delphi Study of IT Project Managers" 50 (50): 398-414, 2013

9 Govindarajan, V., "The Usefulness of Measuring Disruptiveness of Innovations Ex Post in Making Ex Ante Predictions" 23 (23): 12-18, 2006

10 Egyedi, T., "The Standardised Container: Gateway Technologies in Cargo Transportation" 17 : 231-262, 2000

11 Jakobs, K., "The Making of Standards : Looking Inside the Work Groups" 39 (39): 102-107, 2001

12 Christensen, C. M., "The Innovator’s Solution : Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth" Harvard Business School Press 2003

13 DTI(Department of Trade and Industry, UK), "The Empirical Economics of Standards" HMSO 2005

14 Rowe, G., "The Delphi Technique as a Forecasting Tool : Issues and Analysis" 15 (15): 353-375, 1999

15 Skulmoski, G. J., "The Delphi Method for Graduate Research" 6 : 1-21, 2007

16 Okoli, C., "The Delphi Method as a Research Tool : An Example, Design Considerations and Applications" 42 (42): 15-29, 2004

17 ITU-T (International Telecommunication Union Telecommunication Standardization Sector), "Technology Watch"

18 King, M., "Standards and Innovation" University of Manchester 2006

19 Penny, S., "Standardization Supporting Innovation and Growth" European Standardization Organizations 2010

20 Simcoe, T., "Standard Setting Committees : Consensus Governance for Shared Technology Platforms" 102 (102): 305-336, 2012

21 Mattli, W., "Setting International Standards : Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power?" 56 (56): 1-42, 2003

22 De Vries, H., "SME Access to European Standardization: Enabling Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises to Achieve Greater Benefit from Standards and from Involvement in Standardization" Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University 2009

23 O'Sullivan, E., "Role of Standardisation in Support of Emerging Technologies" Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge 2012

24 Blind, K., "Research and Standardisation in Nanotechnology : Evidence from Germany" 34 (34): 320-342, 2009

25 Optimat, "Research Study on the Benefits of Linking Innovation and Standardization" Optimat 2014

26 Lam, S. S. Y., "Prediction and Optimization of a Ceramic Casting Process Using a Hierarchical Hybrid System of Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic" 32 (32): 83-92, 2000

27 한국표준협회, "Next Standards 2016 : 더 나은 미래로 가는 표준 인사이트" 한국표준협회 2015

28 Blind, K., "Motives to Standardize : Empirical Evidence from Germany" 48 : 13-24, 2016

29 Funk, J. L., "Market-and Committee-Based Mechanisms in the Creation and Diffusion of Global Industry Standards : The Case of Mobile Communication" 30 (30): 589-610, 2001

30 Schmidt, R. C., "Managing Delphi Surveys Using Nonparametric Statistical Techniques" 28 (28): 763-774, 1997

31 Schmidt, R., "Identifying Software Project Risks : An International Delphi Study" 17 (17): 5-36, 2001

32 David, P. A., "Formal Standards-Setting for Global Telecommunications and Information Services" 20 (20): 789-815, 1996

33 DeNardis, L., "E-health Standards and Interoperability" ITU Telecommunication Standardization Bureau 2012

34 Kostoff, R. N., "Disruptive Technology Roadmaps" 71 (71): 141-159, 2004

35 Danneels, E., "Disruptive Technology Reconsidered : A Critique and Research Agenda" 21 (21): 246-258, 2004

36 McKinsey Global Institute, "Disruptive Technologies: Advances that Will Transform Life, Business, and the Global Economy" McKinsey&Company 2013

37 Bower, J. L., "Disruptive Technologies : Catching the Wave" 73 (73): 43-53, 1995

38 IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission), "Decisions and Actions Resulting from the SMB Meeting held in Minsk, 2015-10-12"

39 Farrell, J., "Coordination Through Committees and Markets" 19 (19): 235-252, 1988

40 Schumpeter, J. A., "Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy" Harper 1950

41 Dalkey, N. C., "An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts" 9 (9): 458-467, 1963

42 Blind, K., "Alliance Formation of SMEs : Empirical Evidence From Standardization Committees" 60 (60): 148-156, 2013