RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    개발이론과 성인 사회교육 전개의 이론적 탐색

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105482096

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper considers development theory and adult and continuing education
    based on related literature. Modernization theory dominated the mainstream
    conception of development theory until the 1960s, and saw modernization as the
    development of a modern sector based on industrialism. The fundamental premise
    of modernization theory was that there is a single process of social evolution, the
    highest stage having been reached by the United States in the 1950s. Much of the
    writing on adult education and development in the late 1960s was couched in
    terms of modernization theory. The role of adult education and continuing
    education was to help people absorb the rapid social changes associated with the
    transition from a developing society to a modern democratic state, through
    maximum social mobility.
    From the mid-1960s, the modernization theory of development came under attack
    from various sides. Dependency theory challenged that present-day
    underdevelopment is an original condition. This theory argued that
    underdevelopment was created by unequal international relationships that have
    developed since the sixteenth century. According to Baran (1957), the main
    conclusion of dependency theory was that development must be based on a
    socialist revolution and disengagement from the world capitalist market.
    Neoliberal theory also challenged modernization theory, focusing on the idea that
    the market mechanism is the means to ensure an efficient and productive
    economy, and maximize economic welfare. This theory stresses free competition in
    the marketplace. Neoliberalism gives priority to adult education and continuing
    education meeting the needs of the economy. Thus new emphasis was put on
    continuing education, skills training, and human resource development.
    The populist model emerged in the 1980s as a reaction against Eurocentric,
    top-down, environmentally damaging, and urban-centered development. It is seen
    as having failed to meet the needs of those who remain without power in society.
    This model centered on people-centered development, putting great value on
    engendering the consciousness and abilities that are necessary for people to form
    and manage their own organization. The populist model gives priority to forms of
    adult and continuing education that empower the disadvantaged.
    번역하기

    This paper considers development theory and adult and continuing education based on related literature. Modernization theory dominated the mainstream conception of development theory until the 1960s, and saw modernization as the development of a moder...

    This paper considers development theory and adult and continuing education
    based on related literature. Modernization theory dominated the mainstream
    conception of development theory until the 1960s, and saw modernization as the
    development of a modern sector based on industrialism. The fundamental premise
    of modernization theory was that there is a single process of social evolution, the
    highest stage having been reached by the United States in the 1950s. Much of the
    writing on adult education and development in the late 1960s was couched in
    terms of modernization theory. The role of adult education and continuing
    education was to help people absorb the rapid social changes associated with the
    transition from a developing society to a modern democratic state, through
    maximum social mobility.
    From the mid-1960s, the modernization theory of development came under attack
    from various sides. Dependency theory challenged that present-day
    underdevelopment is an original condition. This theory argued that
    underdevelopment was created by unequal international relationships that have
    developed since the sixteenth century. According to Baran (1957), the main
    conclusion of dependency theory was that development must be based on a
    socialist revolution and disengagement from the world capitalist market.
    Neoliberal theory also challenged modernization theory, focusing on the idea that
    the market mechanism is the means to ensure an efficient and productive
    economy, and maximize economic welfare. This theory stresses free competition in
    the marketplace. Neoliberalism gives priority to adult education and continuing
    education meeting the needs of the economy. Thus new emphasis was put on
    continuing education, skills training, and human resource development.
    The populist model emerged in the 1980s as a reaction against Eurocentric,
    top-down, environmentally damaging, and urban-centered development. It is seen
    as having failed to meet the needs of those who remain without power in society.
    This model centered on people-centered development, putting great value on
    engendering the consciousness and abilities that are necessary for people to form
    and manage their own organization. The populist model gives priority to forms of
    adult and continuing education that empower the disadvantaged.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼