Sensitivity Analysis of Equivalence Scale in Income Inequality Studies

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Coulter et al. (1992) argues that the use of different equivalence scales produces the estimations of the inequality indexes with U-shaped pattern where $\theta \approx 0.5$ marks the lowest estimate, and that the McClements Scale used in UK would produce lowest estimates of inequality indexes similar to the case where $\theta \approx 0.6$. Banks and Johnson (1994) counter-argues that such property of McClements Scale depends upon the data at hand and equivalence scale specification in terms of the way children are counted against the number of adults within a single household, rather than on the underlying property of the McClements Scale. This study will, first of all, illustrate that the main source of such dispute about the McClements Scale may come from the proportion of large-size family as well as the single parent households with two young children in the sample data. Secondly, it is argued that such differences in inequality measures from using any values of equivalence scale may not matter, contrary to the common belief, once we employ statistical inferences where the differences in estimated values are not statistically significant.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Schwarze, J., "Using panel data on income satisfaction to estimate equivalence scale elasticity" 49 : 359-371, 2003

2 Lakin, C., "The effects of taxes and benefits on household income, 1999–2000" 569 : 35-79, 2001

3 Harris, T., "The effects of taxes and benefits on household income, 1998-99" 557 : 45-83, 2000

4 Fisher, G., "The development and history of the U. S. poverty thresholds" 55 (55): 3-14, 1997

5 Lanjouw, P., "Poverty and household size" 105 : 1415-1434, 1995

6 Jenkins, S., "Parametric equivalence scales and scale relativities" 104 : 891-900, 1994

7 Oxley, H., "Income distribution and poverty in 13 OECD countries" 29 : 55-94, 1997

8 강영욱, "Identifying the Potential Influences on Income Inequality Changes in Korea ？ Population Subgroup Analysis" 한국행정학회 11 (11): 71-88, 2007

9 강영욱, "How Much Do We Know About Income Inequality in Korea?" 한국행정학회 10 (10): 85-102, 2006

10 Choo, H., "Equivalent scale of expenditure of urban household in Korea" The Korean Economic Association 931-954, 1986

11 Buhmann, B., "Equivalence scales, well-being across ten countries using the Luxemburg Income Study (LIS) database" 34 : 115-142, 1988

12 Banks, J., "Equivalence scale relativities revisited" 104 : 883-890, 1994

13 Coulter, F., "Equivalence scale relativities and the extent of inequality and poverty" 102 : 1067-1082, 1992

14 Giles, D., "Calculating a standard error for the Gini Coefficient: Some further results" Department of Economics, University of Victoria 2002

15 Jorgenson, D., "Aggregate consumer behavior and the measurement of inequality" 51 : 369-392, 1984