RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The State of the Field in the Study of Japanese Buddhism and Remaining Problems

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104529643

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this article, I consider the state of the field in the study of Japanese Buddhism andseveral problems that need to be solved in the future. I begin with a description of thestate of the field in the study of Japanese Buddhism. Although research on JapaneseBuddhism is conducted in several fields, two major fields in which scholars have beenmost active, are history and Buddhist studies. More recently, the field of Japaneseintellectual history has also become an important factor. I think the study of Buddhistdoctrines and theories in preparation for Buddhist debates in the Heian period,which were once frequently held as parts of the ceremonial services that could lead topromotions for the monks, had a strong influence on this tendency.
      After the Meiji period, under the influence of Europe, accurate reading andinterpretation of Buddhist texts seems to become the goal of Buddhist studies in Japan.
      Unbalanced focus on specific periods, lack of attention to foreign scholarly achievementson Japanese Buddhism, the tendency to using willingly the printed source materialsincluding the canons, lack of research on the literary works and lack of studies onmaterials concerning monasticassemblies are also problems in the study of JapaneseBuddhism.
      The field of Buddhist studies in Japan is concentrated on understanding Buddhistdoctrine and philosophy; however, we must be careful not to neglect the realm ofpractice, traditionally consisting of śamatha (shi 止) and vipaśyanā (kan 観). Althoughmaterials relating to practice are fewer in number.
      Japanese Buddhism is still a living tradition, and monks continue their dailylives in temples across the country. It is also important to take present days JapaneseBuddhism into account, and it is obvious that we reconsider methodology again inorder to investigate not only written materials but living monks.
      번역하기

      In this article, I consider the state of the field in the study of Japanese Buddhism andseveral problems that need to be solved in the future. I begin with a description of thestate of the field in the study of Japanese Buddhism. Although research on ...

      In this article, I consider the state of the field in the study of Japanese Buddhism andseveral problems that need to be solved in the future. I begin with a description of thestate of the field in the study of Japanese Buddhism. Although research on JapaneseBuddhism is conducted in several fields, two major fields in which scholars have beenmost active, are history and Buddhist studies. More recently, the field of Japaneseintellectual history has also become an important factor. I think the study of Buddhistdoctrines and theories in preparation for Buddhist debates in the Heian period,which were once frequently held as parts of the ceremonial services that could lead topromotions for the monks, had a strong influence on this tendency.
      After the Meiji period, under the influence of Europe, accurate reading andinterpretation of Buddhist texts seems to become the goal of Buddhist studies in Japan.
      Unbalanced focus on specific periods, lack of attention to foreign scholarly achievementson Japanese Buddhism, the tendency to using willingly the printed source materialsincluding the canons, lack of research on the literary works and lack of studies onmaterials concerning monasticassemblies are also problems in the study of JapaneseBuddhism.
      The field of Buddhist studies in Japan is concentrated on understanding Buddhistdoctrine and philosophy; however, we must be careful not to neglect the realm ofpractice, traditionally consisting of śamatha (shi 止) and vipaśyanā (kan 観). Althoughmaterials relating to practice are fewer in number.
      Japanese Buddhism is still a living tradition, and monks continue their dailylives in temples across the country. It is also important to take present days JapaneseBuddhism into account, and it is obvious that we reconsider methodology again inorder to investigate not only written materials but living monks.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 末木文美士, "近代日本と仏教, 近代日本の思想再考に" Toransubyū 2004

      2 早乙女雅博, "新羅考古学研究" Dōseisha 2010

      3 古宇田亮宣, "和訳天台宗論義二百題" Ryūbunkan 1966

      4 Tendai shū ten hensansho, "Zoku Tendaishū zensho 続天台宗全書" Shunjūsha 1997

      5 Chi, Limei n, "Tsurumi daigaku Bukkyō bunka kenkyūjo monograhu shīrizu 鶴見大学仏教文化研究所モノグラフシリーズ I" Tsurumi daigaku Bukkyō bunka kenkyūjo 2014

      6 Nagamura, Makoto, "Todaiji gureito Budda shinpojumu, Kamakuraki no Tōdaiji fukkō 東大寺グ レイトブッダシンポジウム. 鎌倉期の東大寺復興" Hozōkan 2007

      7 Kanagawa kenritsu Kanazawa bunko, "Sonshōin Bengyō sessō: Honkoku to kaidai 尊勝院弁暁説草: 翻刻と解題" Bensei shuppan 2013

      8 Asao, Naohiro, "Rekishi ishiki no genzai 歴史意識 の現在. Bekkan 別卷 1 of Iwanami kōza Nihon tsūshi 岩波講座日本通史" Iwanami shoten 1995

      9 Uejima, Susumu, "Nihon chūsei shakai no keisei to ōken 日本中世社会の形成と王権" Nagoya daigaku shuppan 2010

      10 Minowa, Kenryō, "Nihon Bukkyō no kyōri keisei 日本仏教の教理形成" Hōzōkan 2009

      1 末木文美士, "近代日本と仏教, 近代日本の思想再考に" Toransubyū 2004

      2 早乙女雅博, "新羅考古学研究" Dōseisha 2010

      3 古宇田亮宣, "和訳天台宗論義二百題" Ryūbunkan 1966

      4 Tendai shū ten hensansho, "Zoku Tendaishū zensho 続天台宗全書" Shunjūsha 1997

      5 Chi, Limei n, "Tsurumi daigaku Bukkyō bunka kenkyūjo monograhu shīrizu 鶴見大学仏教文化研究所モノグラフシリーズ I" Tsurumi daigaku Bukkyō bunka kenkyūjo 2014

      6 Nagamura, Makoto, "Todaiji gureito Budda shinpojumu, Kamakuraki no Tōdaiji fukkō 東大寺グ レイトブッダシンポジウム. 鎌倉期の東大寺復興" Hozōkan 2007

      7 Kanagawa kenritsu Kanazawa bunko, "Sonshōin Bengyō sessō: Honkoku to kaidai 尊勝院弁暁説草: 翻刻と解題" Bensei shuppan 2013

      8 Asao, Naohiro, "Rekishi ishiki no genzai 歴史意識 の現在. Bekkan 別卷 1 of Iwanami kōza Nihon tsūshi 岩波講座日本通史" Iwanami shoten 1995

      9 Uejima, Susumu, "Nihon chūsei shakai no keisei to ōken 日本中世社会の形成と王権" Nagoya daigaku shuppan 2010

      10 Minowa, Kenryō, "Nihon Bukkyō no kyōri keisei 日本仏教の教理形成" Hōzōkan 2009

      11 Tendai shū ten hensansho, "Gika rodan 義科廬談" Shunjūsha 1994

      12 Ōkura seishin bbunka kenkyūjo, "Dōka kokoro no sugatami 道歌心の姿見" Fuyō shobō 1998

      13 Yoshida, Kazuhiko, "Bunkashi no kōsō 文化史の構想" Yoshikawa kōbunkan 2003

      14 Makoto, Hayashi, "Buddhist Studies and Religious Studies in Modern Japan" 76 (76): 2002

      15 Nōjima, Satoru, "Bibliotheca Codicologica Nipponica 日本古写経善本叢刊 IV" Kokusai Bukkyōgaku daigakuin daigaku gakujutsu puronttia iinkai 2010

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.07 0.07 0.11
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.08 0.06 0.384 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼