한국판 초등아동용 피암시성 척도 = Suggestibility Scale for Primary School Children in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to develop a Suggestibility Scale for Primary School Children in Korea(SS-PSCK) by modifying the procedure and the content of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale(Gudjonsson, 1984, 1987), and to test the convergent validity of the scale. The modification of the measurement procedure included a new procedure implemented to minimize the effect of the strength of memory trace on the suggestibility score. The modification of the scale content involved replacing the Shift subscale, which has been known to be unreliable, with misinformation questions to measure misinformation effect which is one of the most important phenomena suggestive of suggestibility. 57 primary school children were measured with the new scale. And those who obtained high suggestibility scores and low suggestibility scores participated in the experiment designed to test the convergent validity of the scale. The internal consistency reliability(KR20) of the SS-PSCK was 0.76. In the validity experiment, the high suggestibility group made more errors in answering suggestive questions than did the low suggestibility group. The results were discussed for theoretical implications for the construct of suggestibility and practical implications for the investigations of crimes either committed against or witnessed by children.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 성인의 심문 피암시성(interrogative suggestibility)을 측정하기 위한 GSS(Gudjonsson, 1984, 1987)의 측정 절차와 척도내용을 수정하여, 한국판 초등아동용 피암시성 척도를 개발하고, 그 척도의 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증한것이다. GSS의 측정절차에서 수정이 이루어진 것은 피암시성 측정에 오염을 초래하는 기억 강도의 효과를 최소화하는 절차가 추가된 것이고, 척도내용에서 수정이 이루어진 것은 신뢰롭지 못한 것으로 알려진 심문 피암시성의 하위요인 ‘번복(Shift)’을 제거하고, 그 대신 피암시성의 중요한 측정국면인 오정보 효과를 측정하기 위한 오정보 질문이 추가된 것이다. 57명의 초등학생이 한국판 초등 아동용 피암시성 척도로 측정되었는데, 이들 중 피암시성이 높은 아동들과 낮은 아동들이 타당도 검증을 위해 비디오를 이용한 실험에 참여하였다. 한국판 초등 아동용 피암시성 척도의 내적 일관성 신뢰도(KR20)는 .76 이었고, 타당도 검증을 위한 실험에서 고피암시성 집단이 저피암시성 집단보다 유의하게 더 많은 오류를 보임으로써 타당도가 지지되었다. 피암시성의 이론적 함의와 아동 피해자 및 목격자를 대상으로 이루어지는 범죄 조사 과정에 대한 실질적 함의가 논의되었다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 교육과학기술부, "초등학교교육과정해설2" 한솔사 2007

2 대검찰청, "범죄분석" 대검찰청 2009

3 Scullin, M. H., "suggestibilityscale for children" 30 : 843-856, 2001

4 Clifford,B.R, "Witnessing: a comparison ofadults and children. In Children Evidence andProcedure, In Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology" British Psychological Society 1993

5 Cohen, R. L., "Thesusceptibility of child witnesses to suggestion" 4 : 201-210, 1980

6 Singh, K. K., "Theinternal consistency of the "Shift" factor on theGudjonsson Suggestibility Scale" 8 : 265-266, 1987

7 Gudjonsson,G.H, "The relationship ofintelligence and memory to interrogativesuggestibility: The importance of range effects" 27 : 185-187, 1988

8 Hornby,P.A, "Surface structure andpresupposition" 13 : 530-538, 1974

9 Gudjonsson,G.H, "Suggestibility, intelligence,memory recall and personality: An experimentalstudy" 142 : 35-37, 1983

10 Ceci, S. J, "Suggestibility of thechild witness: A historical review and Synthesis" 113 : 403-439, 1993

11 Gudjonsson, G. H., "Suggestibility in police interrogation: A socialpsychological model" 1 : 83-104, 1986

12 White, R., "Suggestibility andsalience in people with intellectual disabilities:An experimental critique of the GudjonssonSuggestibility Scale" 16 : 638-650, 2005

13 King, M., "Suggestibility and thechild witness, In Children's Eyewitness Memory" Springer-Verlag 1987

14 Bereiter,C, "Some persisting dilemmas in themeasurement of change, In Problems in measuring change" University of WisconsinPress 3-20, 1963

15 Loftus, E. F., "Semantics integration of verbal information intoa visual memory" 4 : 19-31, 1978

16 Faigman, D. L., "Science in the law: social andbehavioral issues" West Group 2002

17 Endres, J., "Repetitions, warnings, and video: Cognitive andmotivational components in preschool children'ssuggestibility" 4 : 129-146, 1999

18 Piaget,J, "Play, Dreams, and Imitation inChildhood. (C. Cattegno & F. M. Hodgsen.Trans.)" W.W.Norton.(Originalwork published 1945). 1962

19 Nurmoja, M., "On the role oftrait-related characteristics in interrogativesuggestibility: An example form Estonia" 12 : 371-381, 2008

20 Harris, P., "Monsters, ghosts and witches:Testing the limits of the fantasy-realitydistinction in young children" 9 : 105-123, 1991

21 McCloskey, M., "Misleadingpostevent information and memory for events:Arguments and evidence against memoryimpairment hypotheses" 114 : 1-16, 1985

22 Zaragoza,M.S, "Memory, suggestibility, andeyewitness testimony in children and adults, In Children's Eyewitness Memory" Springer-Verlag 1987

23 Ackil, J. K., "Memorialconsequences of forced confabulation: Agedifferences in susceptibility to false memories" 34 : 1358-1372, 1998

24 Gudjonsson,G.H, "Interrogative suggestibility:factor analysis of the Gudjonsson SuggestibilityScale(GSS2)" 13 : 479-481, 1992

25 Gudjonsson, G. H., "Interrogative suggestibility in adult diagnosedwith attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder(ADHD). A potential vulnerability during policequestioning" 43 : 737-745, 2007

26 Belli,R.F, "Influences of misleading posteventinformation: Misinformation interference andacceptance" 118 : 72-85, 1989

27 Singh, K. K., "Ineterrogative suggestibility among adolescentboys and its relationship with intelligence,memory, and cognitive set" 15 : 155-161, 1992

28 Quas, J. A., "Individual differences in children's andadults' suggestibility and false event memory" 9 : 359-390, 1997

29 Eisen, M. L., "Individual differences in adults' suggestibility and memory performance. In Memory &suggestibility in the forensic interview" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 205-233, 2002

30 Deffenbacher,K.A, "Forensic facial memory:Time is of the essence, In Handbook of Research on FaceProcessing" Elsevier SciencePublishers 1989

31 Lindsay, D. S., "Falsememories and the source monitoring framework: Reply to Reyna and Lloyd (1997)" 12 : 145-161, 1997

32 Bruck, M., "Externaland internal sources of variation in the creationof false reports in children" 9 : 289-316, 1997

33 Ackil, J. K., "Developmental differences in eyewitnesssuggestibility and memory for source" 60 : 57-83, 1995

34 Cunningham,J.L, "Contributions to thehistory of psychology: XLVL. The Pioneer workof Alfred Binet on children as eyewitnesses" Psychological Reports 271-277, 1988

35 Liebman, J. I., "Cognitive andpsychosocial correlate of adults' eyewitnessaccuracy and suggestibility" 33 : 49-66, 2002

36 Cronbach,L.J, "Coefficient alpha and theinternal structure of tests" 16 : 297-334, 1951

37 Ornstein, P. A., "Children's memory for a personally experiencedevent: Implications for testimony" 6 : 49-60, 1992

38 Lindsay, D. S., "Aware and unaware uses of memories ofpost-event suggestions, In Memory and Testimonyin the Child Witness" Sage 86-108, 1995

39 Gignac, G. E., "Apsychometric evaluation of the GudjonssonSuggestibility Scale: Problems associated withmeasuring suggestibility as a difference scorecomposite" 46 : 88-93, 2009

40 Gudjonsson,G.H, "A parallel from of theGudjonsson Suggestibility Scale" 26 : 215-221, 1987

41 Gudjonsson,G.H, "A new scale ofinterrogative suggestibility" 5 : 303-314, 1984