단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB) 개발 및 타당화 = A Concise Measure of Subjective Well-Being(COMOSWB): Scale Development and Validation

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구의 목적은 간략하여 사용이 간편하면서 동시에 문화적 공정성을 지닌 행복 척도를 개발 및 타당화하는 것이었다. 이를 위해서 주관적 안녕감의 핵심요소인 삶의 만족, 긍정적 정서, 부정적 정서를 측정하는 단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB: Concise Measure of Subjective Well-Being) 9문항을 개발했다. 삶의 만족은 자신의 개인적 측면에 대한 만족 외에 대인관계와 소속집단에 대한 만족도를 측정하는 문항을 포함했고, 정서적 행복은 2회의 경험적 연구를 통해 행복과 밀접한 관계가 있는 각성수준 고, 중, 저의 긍/부정적 정서 경험으로 문항을 구성했다. 이렇게 개발된 단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB)는 문항수가 적음에도 불구하고 높은 신뢰도와 타당도를 보였다. 구체적으로 새로운 행복 척도는 적절한 수준의 내적 일치도와 검사-재검사 신뢰도, 구인타당도, 수렴 및 변별 타당도가 있었고, 친구들의 행복 평가와도 일치하는 양상을 나타냈다. 끝으로 새롭게 개발된 단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB)가 갖는 의의에 대해 논의했다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A concise, culturally nuanced 9-item subjective well-being scale is introduced. The measure includes 3 positive and negative emotion items, respectively, representing high, medium, and low levels of arousal. Satisfaction is measured in three separate domains of life—personal, relational, and collective. This Concise Measure of Subjective Well-Being (COMOSWB) shows strong levels of reliability (internal, test-retest) and clear patterns of convergent and discriminant validity. Compared to existing measures of happiness, the COMOSWB adds interdependent aspects in measuring satisfaction and includes emotion items that are more balanced in terms of arousal level.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이현희, "한국판 정적 정서 및 부적 정서 척도 (Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule; PANAS)의 타당화 연구" 한국임상심리학회 22 (22): 2003

2 임낭연, "한국에서의 Diener의 삶의 만족 척도 (Satisfaction With Life Scale: SWLS) 사용 연구 개관" 한국심리학회 29 (29): 21-47, 2010

3 김명수, "한국 성인의 행복한 삶의 구성요인 탐색 및 척도개발" 한국건강심리학회 8 (8): 415-442, 2003

4 김완석, "주관적 안녕 척도:공동생활 및행동과의 연관" 3 : 61-81, 1997

5 박윤창, "자극추구동기가 청소년 비행에 미치는 영향" 2 : 53-64, 1995

6 구재선, "심리적 특성, 생활 경험, 행복의 통합적 관계" 한국사회및성격심리학회 20 (20): 1-18, 2006

7 Lee, D., "What makes you happy? A comparisonof self-reported criteria of happiness betweentwo cultures" 50 : 351-362, 1999

8 Russell,J.A, "Two pan-cultural dimensionsof emotion words" 45 : 1281-1288, 1983

9 Bradburn,N.M, "The structure of psychological well-being" Aldine 1969

10 Triandis,H.C, "The self and social behaviorin differing cultural context" 3 : 506-520, 1989

11 Diener, E., "The satisfaction with life scale" 49 : 71-75, 1985

12 Kitayama, S., "The pursuitof happiness and the realization of sympathy:Cultural Patterns of self, social relations, andwell-being, In Culture and subjective well-being" The MIT Press 63-86, 2000

13 Diener, E., "The personality structure of affect" 50 : 130-141, 1995

14 Cantril,H, "The pattern of human concerns.New Brunswick" Rutgers University Press 1965

15 Shigehiro Oishi, "The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life" 53 (53): 80-93, 200601

16 Kim, U, "The challenge of cross-cultural psychology: The roleof the indigenous psychology" 31 : 63-75, 2000

17 Diener, E., "Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress" 125 : 276-302, 1999

18 Diener,E, "Subjective well-being" 95 : 542-575, 1984

19 Andrews, F. M., "SocialIndicators of well-being: America's perception of life quality" Plenum Press 1976

20 Kemper,T, "Power, status, and emotions: Asociological contribution to a psychophysio logical domain, In v" Erlbaum 369-383, 1984

21 Emmons, R. A, "Personality correlates of subjective well-being" 11 : 89-97, 1985

22 Morey,L.C, "Personality AssessmentInventory:Professional Manual" Psychological Assessment Resources Inc. 1991

23 Kwan, V. S. Y., "Pancultural explanations for lifesatis faction adding relationship harmony toself-esteem" 73 : 1038-1051, 1997

24 Diener, E., "New measures of well-being: Flourishing and positive and negative feelings" 39 : 247-266, 2009

25 Lucas, R. E., "Measuring positive emotions, In Positive psychologicalassessment: A handbook of models andmeasures" American Psychological Association 201-218, 2003

26 Costa, P. T, "Influence ofextraversion and neuroticism on subjectivewell-being: Happy and unhappy people" 54 : 296-308, 1980

27 Sedikides, C., "Individual self, relational self, collective self" Taylor & Francis 2001

28 Berry,J.W, "Imposed etics-emics-derivedetics: The operationalization of a compelling idea" 24 : 721-735, 1989

29 Diener, E., "Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity ofpositive versus negative affect. In Subjectivewell-being: An interdisciplinary perspective" Pergamon Press 119-139, 1991

30 서은국, "Events and Subjective Well-Being: Only Recent Events Matter" 70 (70): 1091-1102, 199605

31 Scollon, C. N., "Emotions acrosscultures and methods" 35 : 304-326, 2004

32 Lucas, R. E., "Discriminant validity of subjective well-beingmeasures" 71 : 616-628, 1996

33 Watson, D., "Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales" 54 : 1063-1070, 1988

34 Kitayama, S., "Culture, emotion, and well-being: Goodfeeling in Japan and the Unitied States" 14 : 93-124, 2000

35 Markus, H. R., "Culture andthe self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation" 98 : 224-253, 1991

36 Diener, E., "Culture and subjective well-being" MITPress 2000

37 Lu, L, "Culture and concept ofhappiness: Individual oriented and social oriented SWB" 5 : 269-291, 2004

38 Tsai, J. L., "Cultural variation in affect valuation" 90 : 288-307, 2006

39 Gosling, S. D., "A very brief measure of the Big-Fivepersonality domains" 37 : 504-528, 2003

40 Fordyce,M W, "A review of research on thehappiness measures: A sixty second index of happiness and mental health" 20 : 355-381, 1988

41 Lybomirsky, S., "A measureof subjective happiness: Preliminary reliabilityand construct validation" 46 : 137-155, 1999

42 Chiasson, N., "A lookinto the folk psychology for four cultural groups" 27 : 673-691, 1996

43 Russell,J.A, "A circumplex mode of affect" 39 : 1161-1178, 1980