연구 논문 : 『대한협회회보』의 국가관과 복종 -어휘사와 개념사적 관점에서- = The Perspective of Daehanhyeophoe-Hoebo on State and Bokjong (복종, Servitude) ―Based on Lexical and Conceptual History―

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper examines the view of the state as presented by Daehan- hyeophoe-Hoebo (Korean Association Journal, 1908-1909) which was built on a particular interpretation of Deutschen Offentliches Recht(German Public Law) and Western politics. The use of the term “ Bokjong (복종, servitude)” is employed as a means to investigate this perspective. After the formation of the Korean Empire (大韓帝國), most reformist officials were sent into exile in Japan, where many of them studied public law as articulated by such German-speaking jurists as J.C. Bluntschli and Georg Jellinek. Following the establishment of a Japanese Protectorate on the Korean Peninsula, in 1905, these exiles returned to Korea and translated or retranslated various books about public law； Daehanhyeophoe-Hoebo was the forum in which they expressed their ideas. Ironically, it was just at the time when the Korean Empire had hardly any possibility of surviving as an independent nation that such discussions on the modern nation-state system were at their most vigorous. Articles in Daehanhyeophoe-Hoebo which dealt with the nature of the state make frequent reference to Bluntschli and Rousseau, from which it is clear that the Korean writers accepted this foreign discourse, and also adapted it. They proposed the incorporation of nation, monarch and people into a constitutional monarchy, which they justified in legal terms. The contributors to Daehanhyeophoe wanted to create institutional legal structures to restrict the power of the King, and to secure the rights and freedoms of the people, which they hoped would facilitate the creation of a system based on party politics. Actually, they were struggling to obtain power at a time when the political situation was rapidly changing. In these discussions on the relationship between the nation and the society, and between the law and the people, an interesting term was often used which sheds some light on these struggles：“ Bokjong (복종, servitude),” can be translated as “servitude” but in fact this expression has a complex field of meaning, with the context implied by the Chinese characters suggesting more than mere compulsory submission.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이태훈, "한말 대한협회 주도층의 국가인식과 자본주의 근대화론" 21 : 89-122, 2000

2 박찬승, "한국근대정치사상사연구" 역사비평사 1992

3 전봉덕, "한국 근대 법사상사" 박영사 1984

4 우남숙, "한국 근대 국가론의 이론적 원형에 관한 연구：블룬칠리(J. K. Bluntschli)와 양계초의 유기체론을 중심으로" 22 (22): 113-145, 2000

5 에티엔느 드 라보에티, "자발적 복종" 울력 2004

6 김종준, "일진회의 문명화론과 친일활동" 신구문화사 2010

7 카미야 노리오, "일본근대법의 기저" 44 (44): 425-440, 2003

8 김중현, "인간 불평등 기원론" 웅진씽크빅 2010

9 장 자크 루소, "사회계약론" 서울대학교 출판부 2007

10 "민족문화대백과사전"

11 오근창, "루소의 일반의지 개념에 관한 연구 : '자유롭도록 강제됨'의 의미를 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2012

12 김성옥, "루소의 일반 의지" 민음사 1993

13 최혜경, "대한협회와 우천 조완구" 한국동학학회 (20) : 137-157, 2006

14 전성규, "대한민보(大韓民報)의 언어정리사업과 소설연구" 성균관대학교 2012

15 김효전, "근대 한국의 국가사상：국권회복과 민권수호" 철학과현실사 2000

16 스즈키 마사유키, "근대 일본의 천황제" 이산 1998

17 진관타오, "관념사란 무엇인가 2" 푸른역사 2010

18 조형렬, "개신 유학자 설태희(1875-1940)를 통해 본 문화운동의 이념적변화" 고려대학교 2004

19 표정욱, "강유위와 양계초의 '국가' 사상에 관한 연구 : 체제구상을 중심으로" 성균관대학교 대학원 2006

20 이기동, "孟子" 성균관대학교 출판부 1993

21 "大韓協會會報"

22 김항구, "大韓協會(1907-1910) 硏究" 檀國大學校 大學院 1993

23 崔美淑, "大垣丈夫 硏究 : 大韓自强會와 大韓協會의 活動을 中心으로" 淑明女子大學校 大學院 1996