RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    표준중국어 음절구조와 활음의 위치 = The Syllabic Structure of Mandarin and the Status of Glides

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104460787

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article points out some problems of various theories on the syllabic structure of Modern Mandarin. They include the conventional view presented in (1), Duanmu’s (2007) revised structure shown in (5-7), and Lin’s (2007) illustrated in (8, 11). The author rejects Lin’s structure because it can have two vowels as nuclei. He disputes Duanmu’s distinction between the full and weak syllables. According to Duanmu, a full syllable must have a coda while a weak syllable should not. Under his theory, the nucleus of a heavy syllable with zero coda must to be changed to a long vowel, compared to the same one with a coda. Since vowel length plays no role in semantic distinction in Mandarin, Duanmu’s two tracks of structure are not so plausible. In addition, unlike the pre-nucleus glide, his syllabic structure treats post-nucleus glide as a vowel that occupies the node of coda. This is not only an inconsistent treatment of glides but violates the definition of glide. The author disputes also the ideas which consider the post-nuclear glide as a part of nucleus as is illustrated in (18bd) because there are no sufficient reasons to combine the nucleus and the post-nucleus glide. To conclude, the author proposes a new structure Mandarin in (20), which can be illustrated as (21) in short.
    번역하기

    This article points out some problems of various theories on the syllabic structure of Modern Mandarin. They include the conventional view presented in (1), Duanmu’s (2007) revised structure shown in (5-7), and Lin’s (2007) illustrated in (8, 11)....

    This article points out some problems of various theories on the syllabic structure of Modern Mandarin. They include the conventional view presented in (1), Duanmu’s (2007) revised structure shown in (5-7), and Lin’s (2007) illustrated in (8, 11). The author rejects Lin’s structure because it can have two vowels as nuclei. He disputes Duanmu’s distinction between the full and weak syllables. According to Duanmu, a full syllable must have a coda while a weak syllable should not. Under his theory, the nucleus of a heavy syllable with zero coda must to be changed to a long vowel, compared to the same one with a coda. Since vowel length plays no role in semantic distinction in Mandarin, Duanmu’s two tracks of structure are not so plausible. In addition, unlike the pre-nucleus glide, his syllabic structure treats post-nucleus glide as a vowel that occupies the node of coda. This is not only an inconsistent treatment of glides but violates the definition of glide. The author disputes also the ideas which consider the post-nuclear glide as a part of nucleus as is illustrated in (18bd) because there are no sufficient reasons to combine the nucleus and the post-nucleus glide. To conclude, the author proposes a new structure Mandarin in (20), which can be illustrated as (21) in short.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정 진취앤, "현대중국어 생성음운론" 학고방 2002

    2 엄익상, "표준중국어음운론" 한국문화사 2003

    3 박종한, "중국어의 비밀" 궁리 2012

    4 이재돈, "중국어음운학" 학고방 2007

    5 최영애, "중국어란 무엇인가" 통나무 1998

    6 엄익상, "중국어 음운론과 응용" 한국문화사 2012

    7 린 얜후이, "중국어 말소리" 역락 2010

    8 엄익상, "중국어 교육론" 한국문화사 2011

    9 林涛, "音韵学概要" 商务印书馆 2004

    10 林燾, "語音學敎程" 北京大學出版社 1992

    1 정 진취앤, "현대중국어 생성음운론" 학고방 2002

    2 엄익상, "표준중국어음운론" 한국문화사 2003

    3 박종한, "중국어의 비밀" 궁리 2012

    4 이재돈, "중국어음운학" 학고방 2007

    5 최영애, "중국어란 무엇인가" 통나무 1998

    6 엄익상, "중국어 음운론과 응용" 한국문화사 2012

    7 린 얜후이, "중국어 말소리" 역락 2010

    8 엄익상, "중국어 교육론" 한국문화사 2011

    9 林涛, "音韵学概要" 商务印书馆 2004

    10 林燾, "語音學敎程" 北京大學出版社 1992

    11 北京大學中文系, "現代漢語專題敎程" 北京大學出版社 2003

    12 胡裕树, "現代漢語" 三聯書店 1992

    13 严翼相, "现代汉语音节结构重考" 四川师大文学院 2012

    14 严翼相, "现代汉语的儿化韵和音节结構" 26 : 36-42, 2006

    15 崔姝絃, "核后滑音的性质和标记法研究" 四川师大文学院 2012

    16 薛凤生, "北京音系解析" 北京語言大學出版社 1986

    17 孙景涛, "介音在音f节中的地位" 21 : 44-52, 2006

    18 黄伯荣, "『现代汉语』增訂版 上下冊" 高等敎育出版社 1991

    19 Lin, Yen-Hwei, "The Sounds of Chinese" Cambridge University Press 2007

    20 Duanmu, Sa, "The Phonology of Standard Chinese" Oxford University Press 2000

    21 Duanmu, San, "Syllabic Structure" Oxford University Press 2009

    22 Cheng, Robert L., "Mandarin Phonological Structure" 2 (2): 135-262, 1966

    23 Bright, William, "International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Volume 4" Oxford University Press 1992

    24 Duanmu, San, "Chinese Syllable Stucture, In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Volume V: Phonology across Languages" Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011

    25 Cheng, Chin-chuan, "A Synchronic Phonology of Mandarin Chinese" Mouton 1973

    26 Duanmu, San, "A Formal Study of Syllable, Tone, Stress and Domain in Chinese Languages" Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1990

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-02-26 학회명변경 영문명 : The Chinese Linguistic Society Of Korea -> Korea Association of Chinese Linguistics KCI등재
    2015-02-26 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Chinese Linguistics in Korea -> Korea Journal of Chinese Linguistics KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.26 0.26 0.25
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.24 0.24 0.45 0.12
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼