첸중수(錢鍾書)의 번역가 인식의 의의와 한계 = The significance and limitations of Qian Zhongshu's perceptions of translators

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study set out to investigate Qian Zhongshu's perceptions of translators in his Lin Shu's Translations and shed light on their significance and limitations. Qian Zhongshu was one of the greatest translation theorists during the period of the Republic of China along with Fu Lei. Before him, Lin Shu was considered as the figure of authority on novel translation, but he also received negative evaluations. When Lin Shu's translation was assessed in the style of writing, method, content, and mistranslation, some were positive about his translation, saying that his style of writing was superior and that his method was inevitable. Many others were negative, pointing out that his style of writing was anachronistic, that his method was wrong, that the content was immoral, and that he had many cases of mistranslation. In his Lin Shu's Translations, Qian Zhongshu depicted him as one of the translators with superior force in the style of writing among his contemporary translators. He admitted that there were some cases of mistranslation in Lin Shu's translation, but he argued that they were derived from Lin Shu's intention to overcome the shortcomings of original works. He even maintained that Lin Shu used a desirable method of translation to supplement and overcome the shortcomings of original works. Qian Zhongshu showed limitations in his attempt at making Lin Shu, who was a translator with little regard to original authors and strong consciousness for "Chinese culture as Ti and Western culture as Yong" in Qing Dynasty, a modern model. Qian Zhongshu, however, holds significance in raising the status of translators by showing that translators could be superior to original authors.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 聂友军, "｢林纾的翻译｣与钱锺书的翻译观" 2 : 92-97, 2015

2 손지봉, "林語堂 번역론 연구" 한국중국학회 (62) : 173-189, 2010

3 楊麗華, "林紓飜譯硏究" 湖南師範大學 2012

4 劉宏照., "林紓小說飜譯硏究" 華東師範大學 2010

5 鄭振鐸, "林琴南先生" 商務印書館 1981

6 이성규, "태사공서의법연구" 21 : 425-453, 1997

7 손지봉, "중국의 번역론에 대한 전통문학론의 영향 고찰 -嚴復, 郭沫若, 林語堂, 錢鍾書-" 한국통번역교육학회 8 (8): 133-149, 2010

8 손지봉, "린수(林紓)의 소설번역에 대한 평가" 한국통역번역학회 15 (15): 101-129, 2013

9 손지봉, "량치차오의 번역론에 나타난 국가번역사업 고찰" 한국통역번역학회 14 (14): 79-102, 2012

10 楊全紅, "钱锺书飜譯思想硏究" 上海外國語大學 2007

11 손지봉, "郭沫若의 번역론 연구" 중국어문학회 (28) : 183-204, 2008

12 陳福康, "譯學理論史稿" 上海外語敎育出版社 2000

13 姜海佳, "論傅雷的飜譯觀" 20 (20): 81-85, 2004

14 林元彪, "视译者与 “林纾的翻译” -基于口译精力负荷模型的考察" 2 : 23-30, 2018

15 胡適, "胡適全集" 安徽敎育出版社 2003

16 黄元军, "翻译视域下的林纾现象-兼论林纾的翻译" 22 (22): 72-77, 2010

17 劉麗華, "王佐良的译者观" 23 (23): 172-175, 2002

18 林語堂, "民國叢書第一編51-語言學論叢"

19 梁啓超, "梁啓超論淸學史二種" 复旦大學出版社 1985

20 錢鍾書, "林纾的翻译" 商務印書館 1981

21 薛綏之, "林紓研究資料" 福建人民出版社 1982

22 吳俊, "林琴南書話" 浙江人民出版社 1999

23 北京大學, "文學運動史料選1" 上海敎育出版社 1979

24 徐敬修, "文學常識" 大東書局 1925

25 關詩珮, "從林紓看文學翻譯規範由晚清中國到五四的轉變： 西化、現代化和以原著為中的觀念" 17 : 343-371, 2008

26 孫德謙, "太史公書義法" 中華書局 1983

27 鍾叔河, "周作人文類編" 湖南文藝出版社 1998

28 손지봉, "傅雷의 번역관 고찰" 중국학연구회 (52) : 163-183, 2010

29 夏曉虹, "二十世紀中國小說理論資料" 北京大學出版社 1997

30 孟昭毅, "中國飜譯文學史" 北京大學出版社 2005

31 王秉欽, "20世紀中國飜譯思想史" 南開大學出版社 2005

32 方華文, "20世紀中國飜譯史" 西北大學出版社 2005