일제강점기의 유교의례 변화양상

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Japanese rulers found that Confucianism had a double meaning in Korea. One was the importance of traditional values reflecting morals and customs in Korea; while the other aspect was the reputation of Korean Confucians as Chinese flunkeys abusing Confucianism values. However, the Japanese government worried that social disorder would emerge if they abolished Korean Confucian customs. To maintain control, the Japanese decided to keep the traditional Confucian values of royalty, filial piety and chastity. The topknot symbolized that one was a gentleman and was a visual symbol of cultural pride. In the 『Ritual Criterion』do not mention on the ageing ceremony. But this time already disappear topknot and old costumes, they suggest renewal costumes with cerebration for ageing. Underage marriage customs and the reluctance of widow remarriage was still common until the 1930s. According to the 『Ritual Criterion』, legal permission for a widow to remarry did not influence the popular repugnance to this practice. The Japanese insisted on simplifying the traditional mourning system and its five pieces of attire. In the 『Ritual Criterion』 proposition, mourning was reduced to a 14 day period and wearing mourning dress was decreased to one year from the traditional mourning of 3 years. Even though the memorial service ask simplification, Japanese rulers respected Korean traditions and wrote laws based on Korean customs. They proposed simplification of memorial services from offering from 4 generations at the memorial service to offering from 2 generations. They also proposed simplification of Myojae (墓祭;a memorial service held before the grave) and Jaesoo (祭需;foods of sacrificial service).

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 일제의 유교전통에 대한 두 가지 시각
• Ⅲ. 유교 가정의례의 변용
• Ⅳ. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 朝鮮總督府, (7) : 1939

2 나혜석, "理想的 婦人" (3) : 1914

3 윤상덕, "호주제도 폐지의 당위성과 개선방안에 대한 고찰" 2005

4 최길성, "한국인의 조상숭배와 효" 민속원 2010

5 이승일, "조선총독부 법제정책" 역사비평사 2008

6 강병식, "일제하 한국에서의 결혼과 이혼 및 출산 실태연구" 단국대 사학회 28 : 1995

7 김도형, "일제하 한국사회의 전통과 근대인식" 혜안 2009

8 김원열, "일제강점기 황도 유림의 사회 윤리에 대한 계보학적 연구" 한국철학사상연구회 21 (21): 87-116, 2010

9 허영섭, "일본 조선총독부를 세우다" 채륜

10 류미나, "식민지기 조선의 명륜학원" 교육사학회 17 (17): 53-77, 2007

11 양현아, "식민지 시기 한국 가족법의 관습문제 I" 58 : 2000

12 박선미, "근대여성, 제국을 거쳐 조선으로 회유하다" 창비 2007

13 福田量作, "韓國倂合記念史" 大日本實業協會藏版 1914

14 高橋 亨, "王道儒道より皇道儒道へ" 朝鮮總督府 (295) : 1930

15 本間九介, "朝鮮雜錄" 김영사 2008

16 藤田東三, "朝鮮親族法相續法" 大阪屋號書店 1933

17 野村調太郞, "朝鮮慣習法上の家と其の相續制" 6 (6): 1940

18 朝鮮總督府中樞院, "慣習調査報告書" 1913

19 辛東植, "家禮輯解"

20 尹德榮, "全鮮儒林大會における經學院大提學訓示要旨" (45) :

21 忠淸南道, "儀禮軌範"

22 洪承日, "儀禮要覽" 1929

23 安東郡邑面 農村振興委員會, "儀禮準則"

24 金鎭孝, "儀禮備要" 儀禮備要社 1939

25 羅濬, "二禮略解"

26 장미경, "<修身書>로 본 조선총독부의 ‘식민지 여성’ 교육" 한국일본어문학회 1 (1): 377-396, 2009