RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    금산분리 법제의 역사적 및 철학적 기초에 대한 검토

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper inquires into the historical and Philosophical Underpinnings of the separation of banking and commerce, and discusses the meaning and scope of the separation. The separation principle began in Venice where bank was born, which means that the separation principle is one of the oldest principles that has lasted the most in banking regulation. In the early history of banks in the U.K. and U.S., the separation was adopted as a foundational principle. In Korea also, the separation has stood long since it was adopted in the Interim Measure Act for Financial Institutions of 1961 and Banking Act of 1982. Why the separation of banking and commerce? First, it concerns the bank soundness, systemic safety and depositor protection. Second, the regulatory scope in which the separation rule applies has been expanded from ‘banking in nature’ to ‘financial in nature’under the GLB Act in the U.S. Fourth, financial safety net such as deposit insurance includes securities firms, insurance, saving institution as well as banks. According to Mark Roe(1994), the separation principle has contributed to the competitiveness of firms and development of nation economy.
    번역하기

    This paper inquires into the historical and Philosophical Underpinnings of the separation of banking and commerce, and discusses the meaning and scope of the separation. The separation principle began in Venice where bank was born, which means that th...

    This paper inquires into the historical and Philosophical Underpinnings of the separation of banking and commerce, and discusses the meaning and scope of the separation. The separation principle began in Venice where bank was born, which means that the separation principle is one of the oldest principles that has lasted the most in banking regulation. In the early history of banks in the U.K. and U.S., the separation was adopted as a foundational principle. In Korea also, the separation has stood long since it was adopted in the Interim Measure Act for Financial Institutions of 1961 and Banking Act of 1982. Why the separation of banking and commerce? First, it concerns the bank soundness, systemic safety and depositor protection. Second, the regulatory scope in which the separation rule applies has been expanded from ‘banking in nature’ to ‘financial in nature’under the GLB Act in the U.S. Fourth, financial safety net such as deposit insurance includes securities firms, insurance, saving institution as well as banks. According to Mark Roe(1994), the separation principle has contributed to the competitiveness of firms and development of nation economy.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이규성, "한국의 외환위기: 발생, 극복, 그 이후" 박영사 2006

    2 김자봉, "인터넷전문은행은 은산분리규제의 예외인가? -소유와 지배의 분리원칙에 대한 논의를 중심으로-" 한국금융법학회 15 (15): 175-208, 2018

    3 박경서, "은행의 소유 지배구조에 관한 연구" 한국금융연구원 1997

    4 김용재, "은행법원론" 박영사 2019

    5 김자봉, "은산분리의 실증분석: 은행과 산업의 결합에 따른 비용-편익의 추정을 중심으로" 한국금융학회 35 (35): 113-145, 2021

    6 이우관, "금융자율화의 효율적 추진방향" 한국경제연구원 1988

    7 이동걸, "금융기관을 이용한 경제력 집중: 문제점 및 개선방안" 한국금융연구원 14 (14): 2005

    8 고동원, "금융규제법 개론" 박영사 2019

    9 전성인, "금융과 산업의 분리 : 이론과 정책과제" 금융학회 2008

    10 금융개혁위원회, "금융개혁 종합보고서" 1999

    1 이규성, "한국의 외환위기: 발생, 극복, 그 이후" 박영사 2006

    2 김자봉, "인터넷전문은행은 은산분리규제의 예외인가? -소유와 지배의 분리원칙에 대한 논의를 중심으로-" 한국금융법학회 15 (15): 175-208, 2018

    3 박경서, "은행의 소유 지배구조에 관한 연구" 한국금융연구원 1997

    4 김용재, "은행법원론" 박영사 2019

    5 김자봉, "은산분리의 실증분석: 은행과 산업의 결합에 따른 비용-편익의 추정을 중심으로" 한국금융학회 35 (35): 113-145, 2021

    6 이우관, "금융자율화의 효율적 추진방향" 한국경제연구원 1988

    7 이동걸, "금융기관을 이용한 경제력 집중: 문제점 및 개선방안" 한국금융연구원 14 (14): 2005

    8 고동원, "금융규제법 개론" 박영사 2019

    9 전성인, "금융과 산업의 분리 : 이론과 정책과제" 금융학회 2008

    10 금융개혁위원회, "금융개혁 종합보고서" 1999

    11 김자봉, "금산분리의 법리 - 법적 권리 간 이해상충의 경제적 인센티브와 충돌의 사회적 비용을 중심으로" 은행법학회 13 (13): 91-117, 2020

    12 김자봉, "금산분리의 경제 이론" (98) : 2019

    13 "https://www.thompsoncoburn.com/docs/default-source/default-document-library/the-future-of-b anking-in-america73df2a26dda26f05acb8ff0000ba5cc9.pdf?sfvrsn=197d45ea_0"

    14 Arthur E. Wilmarth, Jr., "Wal-Mart and the Separation of Banking and Commerce" 39 (39): 2007-, 2007

    15 Joshua Cutler, "Wal-Mart and Banking"

    16 Cantwell F. Muckenfuss III, "The separation of banking and commerce revisited, in The Mixing of Banking and Commerce"

    17 Bair, Sheila C, "The future of banking in America" 16 (16): 2004

    18 Bair, Sheila C., "The fourth wave – the mixing of banking and commerce" 2007

    19 Shull, Bernard, "The Separation of Banking and Commerce in the United States: an Examination of Principal Issues" OCC 1999

    20 Bernard Shull, "The Separation of Banking and Commerce in the United States" FDIC 1999

    21 Muckenfuss III, "The Separation of Banking and Commerce Revisited, in The Mixing of Banking and Commerce"

    22 Krainer, John, "The Separation of Banking and Commerce" 16 : 2000

    23 Berger, Allen N, "The Roles of Corporate Governance in Bank Failures during the Recent Financial Crisis" 48 (48): 2016

    24 Omarova, Saule T., "The Merchants of Wall Street: Banking, Commerce and Commodities" 98 : 265-, 2013

    25 FDIC, "The Future of Banking: The Structure and Role of Commercial Affiliations"

    26 FDIC Office of Inspector General, "The Division of Supervision and Consumer Protection’s Approach for Supervising Limited-Charter Depository Institutions"

    27 FDIC, "Supervisory Insights - The FDIC's Supervision of Industrial Loan Companies: A Historical Perspective"

    28 Roe, Mark J., "Strong Managers Weak Owners:The Political Roots of American Finance" Princeton University 1994

    29 U.S. Department of Treasury, "STATEMENT BY PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON AT THE SIGNING OF THE FINANCIAL MODERNIZATION BILL"

    30 GAO, "Recent Asset Growth and Commercial Interest Highlight Differences in Regulatory Authority"

    31 Kolari, James, "Predicting large US Commercial Bank Failures" 54 : 2002

    32 Neel, Michelle Clark, "Industrial loan companies come out of the shadows"

    33 Campbell, John Y, "In Search of Distressed Risk" LXIII (LXIII): 2008

    34 김자봉, "ILC는 은산분리규제의 예외인가? -은산분리원칙에 대한 미국 감독당국의 정책수단과 “ILC 예외제도”의 시사점" 은행법학회 11 (11): 203-237, 2018

    35 "H.R. 4173 (111th): Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act"

    36 Barr, Michael S, "Financial Regulation: Law and Policy" Foundation Press 184-, 2016

    37 Park, Sangkyunk, "Effects of the affiliation of banking and commerce on the firm’s investment and the bank’s risk" 24 : 2000

    38 Martin, Daniel, "Early Warning of Bank Failures" 1 : 1977

    39 "Dodd Frank Act Section 603. MORATORIUM AND STUDY ON TREATMENT OF CREDIT CARD BANKS, INDUSTRIAL LOAN COMPANIES, AND CERTAIN OTHER COMPANIES UNDER THE BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1956"

    40 "Directive 2006/48/EC of the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions"

    41 Seidman, L. William, "Comments at the FDIC Symposium, The Future of Banking: The Structure and Role of Commercial Affiliations"

    42 GAO, "Characteristics and Regulation of Exempt Institutions and the Implications of Removing the Exemptions"

    43 Erkki K. Laitine, "Bankruptcy prediction: Application of the Taylor’s expansion in logistic regression" 9 : 2000

    44 Tenhundfeld, Mark J., "Banking and Commerce: 1+1=0, The mixing of banking and Commerce"

    45 Macey, Jonathan R., "Banking Law and Regulation" Aspen Law & Business 2001

    46 Mark Olson, "Are banks still special?, remarks at the Annual Washington Conference of the Institute of International Bankers" BIS Review 20 : 2006

    47 The U.S. House of Representatives 101st Congress, "An international comparison of banking regulatory structures, A staff study for the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs" 1990

    48 Comizio, V. Gerard, "After the Dodd-Frank Indusrial Loan Company Moratorium: What's Next" 17 : 2013

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2008-05-07 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Banking Law Association -> Korea Banking and Financial Law Association
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.48 0.48 0.47
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.41 0.35 0.787 0.21
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼