중국의 법원조정에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Court Mediation of China

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

By reviewing the present conditions and tasks of the court mediation after examining the change process of the court mediation according to China`s judicial reform, this paper provides basic data for our companies and individuals to correctly understand the Chinese court mediation system and make better use it in solving civil disputes in China China is considered to get closer to so called modern legal judicial system because its system is changed from the lawsuit structure where People`s Court and the party are opposed around the authority detection of existing judges to consumerism with an emphasis on the attack and defense among parties in addition to the expansion of judicial personnel including judges, establishment of trial norms through judicial reform. However, the traditional dispute resolution method combining mediation and trial that has been conducted for a long time is still emphasized. Rather than being introduced to complement the lawsuit system as part of the lawsuit system, the court mediation procedures of China remained as the lawsuit system itself in the early stage and its operation was completely entrusted to the discretion of the judge, the presiding officer of the court mediation. Although laws or institutions are maintained and roles or functions of the court mediation are changed significantly and the court mediation by laws is emphasized due to judicial reform, `political intention` to promote the stability of the society may bring about the result of sacrificing the rights of the parties. In this situation, the court mediation of China has at least the following tasks. First, since in the case of the court mediation combining mediation and trial, judicial personnel is likely to abuse power, the relationship between the mediation and trial should be established reasonably and medication should be made by law. Second, an attempt to increase the medication rate too artificially for reasons of political intention or limits of judicial resources is likely to violate the party`s right for trial and therefore, it should be institutionalized to allow the party to randomly select either trial or mediation. Third, the problem of judicial corruption should be solved by improving the professional ethics of judicial resources as well as qualifications of judges continuously.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 章武生, "｢訴訟法論叢 第5卷" 法律出版社 2000

2 江 澕, "｢江華司法文潗" 人民法院出版社 1989

3 장송청, "중국의 인민조정제도 개관" 법학연구소 23 (23): 143-185, 2011

4 최송자, "중국 민사소송법의 제2차 개정 내용 및 평가" 한국민사소송법학회 17 (17): 241-283, 2013

5 양영희, "외국사법연수논집(26상)" 법원도서관 11 : 2005

6 함영주, "분쟁해결방법론" 진원사 2010

7 송상현, "민사소송법" 박영사 2011

8 肖周錄, "陜甘寧辺區民事立法及基特徵" 2010

9 肖周錄, "陜甘寧辺區民事法律的機個問題" 2009

10 蘇力, "關於能動司法与大調解" 中國法學會 2010

11 曾憲義, "關於中國傳統調停制度的若干問題硏究" 中國法學會 2004

12 中國法官協會調硏組, "關于基層法院調解工作的調査報告" 中國人民大學書報資料センター 2004

13 賀衛方, "走向權利的時代--中國公民權利發展硏究" 中國政法大學出版社 2000

14 李方民, "調判關係的司法正位及其完善" 2008

15 範愉, "訴訟調解 : 審判經驗与法學原理" 中國法學會 2009

16 兼子一, "裁判法" 有婓閣 1999

17 趙艶花, "行政訴訟重的調解 : 西方的經驗与中國的選擇" 2009

18 江必新, "社會主義司法基本價値初探" 國家法官學院 2009

19 夏錦文, "當代中國的司法改革 : 成就,問題与出路--以人民法院爲中心的分析" 中國法學會 2010

20 王亞新, "現代民事司法の諸相(谷口安平先生古稀祝賀)" 成文堂 2005

21 小口彦太, "現代中國法" 成文堂 2004

22 譚兵主, "民事訴訟法" 法律出版社 2001

23 三ケ月章, "民事訴訟法" 弘文堂 1992

24 陣桂明, "民事訴訟法" 中國政法大學出版社 2007

25 李浩, "民事訴訟中的審前程序硏究" 中國政法大學 2004

26 李浩, "民事審判中的調審分離" 中國社會科學院法學硏究所 1996

27 强世功, "權力的組織網絡与法律的治理化" 法律出版社 3 (3): 2000

28 謝海定, "改革司法--中國司法改革的回顧与前瞻" 社會科學文獻出版社 2005

29 趙明, "從歷史的深處走来--漫議轉型時期的當代中國政治与司法改革" 山束政法學院 2008

30 宋凱楚, "對訴訟調解制度規範化的思考" 2005

31 陣桂明, "審前準備程序設計中的几對關係問題" 2004

32 耿宝建, "定紛止爭莫忘定分--對調解熱的冷思考" 2005

33 張衛平, "回歸‘馬錫五’的思考" 西南政法大學 2009

34 劉建軍, "回望我國六十年民事審判方式的演進与變遷" 2009

35 胡光輝, "充分發揮司法調停在構建社會主義和諧社會中的積極作用" 最高人民法院 2006

36 佟季, "人民法院訴訟調解情況分析--馬錫五審判方式在中國的當代司法價値" 2010

37 渡辺千原, "交涉と紛爭處理" 日本評論社 2004

38 이종길, "中國의 調解制度와 離婚法規에 대한 一 檢討" 법학연구소 (47) : 361-401, 2010

39 김호, "中國의 法院調停에 관한 硏究" 한중법학회 12 : 179-200, 2010

40 李衛東, "中國的裁判の構圖" 有斐閣 2004

41 朱景文, "中國法治道路的探索--以糾紛解決的正規化和非正規化爲視覺" 華東政法大學 2009

42 曾憲義, "中國法制史" 北京大學出版社․高等敎育出版社 2000

43 韓寧, "中國の調停制度 : 日本․米國との比較" 信山出版社 2008

44 胡光輝, "中國における法院調停" 早稻田大學校比較法硏究所 44 (44): 2010

45 宇田用幸則, "中國における司法制度改革-裁判官制度改革と‘裁判官の獨立’を中心に-" (2) : 2001

46 Qiu, Xingmei, "中国司法调解六十年变迁与思考" 한국민사소송법학회 18 (18): 469-523, 2014

47 김상찬, "ADR" 도서출판 온누리 2012