RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    A Head-Driven and Constraint-Based Analysis of Korean Relative Clause Constructions

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19563938

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Relative clause constructions have been notorious for their complexity in terms of syntax and semantics. This paper develops a treatment of the syntactic and semantic properties of Korean relative clause constructions, differing in several key respects from those of English. This treatment, developed within the tradition of a constraint-based framework. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar theory, adapts Sag's (1997) approach to grammatical constructions in English relatives. As in Sag's analysis, our analysis is 'head-driven' and 'constraint-based' in the sense that the head of a lexical (relative-clause) head and declarative constraints on well-defined constructions play a crucial role in the formation of relative clauses. This system enables us to eliminate the invisible element (e.g., trace or empty operator) from the analysis of Korean relative clauses and futher to express cross-cutting generalizations among grammatical constructions thru the mechanism of hierarchical inheritance of type constraints. One of the main consequences of this analysis is to provide a straightforward account for local as well as non local relative clause constructions which have been known as violating the firm syntactic island constraints such as the Complex Noun Phrase Constraints (CNPC) but for which no plausible and comprehensive analysis has been provided yet.
    번역하기

    Relative clause constructions have been notorious for their complexity in terms of syntax and semantics. This paper develops a treatment of the syntactic and semantic properties of Korean relative clause constructions, differing in several key respect...

    Relative clause constructions have been notorious for their complexity in terms of syntax and semantics. This paper develops a treatment of the syntactic and semantic properties of Korean relative clause constructions, differing in several key respects from those of English. This treatment, developed within the tradition of a constraint-based framework. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar theory, adapts Sag's (1997) approach to grammatical constructions in English relatives. As in Sag's analysis, our analysis is 'head-driven' and 'constraint-based' in the sense that the head of a lexical (relative-clause) head and declarative constraints on well-defined constructions play a crucial role in the formation of relative clauses. This system enables us to eliminate the invisible element (e.g., trace or empty operator) from the analysis of Korean relative clauses and futher to express cross-cutting generalizations among grammatical constructions thru the mechanism of hierarchical inheritance of type constraints. One of the main consequences of this analysis is to provide a straightforward account for local as well as non local relative clause constructions which have been known as violating the firm syntactic island constraints such as the Complex Noun Phrase Constraints (CNPC) but for which no plausible and comprehensive analysis has been provided yet.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Theoretical Foundations of HPSG
    • 2.1. Structures and (Universal) Constraints
    • 3. Basics of a Head-Driven, Traceless Theory
    • 3.1. Trace-Based vs. Traceless-Based Analyses
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Theoretical Foundations of HPSG
    • 2.1. Structures and (Universal) Constraints
    • 3. Basics of a Head-Driven, Traceless Theory
    • 3.1. Trace-Based vs. Traceless-Based Analyses
    • 3.2. General Constraints for Extraction
    • 3.3. General Constraints on Prenominal Suffixed Word
    • 4. Korean Relative Clauses
    • 4.1. Locally Gapped Relative Clauses
    • 4.1.1. Relativization of an Argument
    • 4.1.2. Relativization of an Adjunct Element
    • 4.1.3. Interface with Semantics of RCs
    • 4.1.4. One Additional Type of Local Relative: Genitive Relatives
    • 4.1.5. Summary
    • 4.2. Non-Local Relativization
    • 4.2.1. Relativization from an Embedded Sentential Complement Clause
    • 4.2.2 Relativization from a Relative Clause
    • 4.2.3. Relativization from an Adverbial Clause:
    • 4.2.4. Summary
    • 5. Conclusions
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼