RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Effects of Corrective Feedback on College Students’ English Writing Accuracy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104201124

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study aims at investigating the overall effects of corrective feedback provided by the teacher on the development of EFL students’ writing accuracy and the relationship between error types and revision outcomes in accordance with writing genre and the frequency of draft.
      For the present study, 12 college students’ writing samples were collected according to the three genres of descriptive, explorative, and argumentative essays. Corrective feedback was given by the instructor two times on the 1st and 2nd drafts of the essays, and the students were asked to revise the drafts based on the feedback provided by the instructor. They had to produce three drafts for each genre. The grammatical errors they committed in writing were analyzed in the categories of genre, the frequency of draft, students’ revision behaviors (six types), and error types (13 types). The findings from the study were that corrective feedback was fairly conducive to the development of the EFL students’ writing accuracy, and that the students showed differing levels of progress through different error revision behaviors in their essay writing in terms of error types depending upon genre and the frequency of draft.
      번역하기

      This study aims at investigating the overall effects of corrective feedback provided by the teacher on the development of EFL students’ writing accuracy and the relationship between error types and revision outcomes in accordance with writing genre ...

      This study aims at investigating the overall effects of corrective feedback provided by the teacher on the development of EFL students’ writing accuracy and the relationship between error types and revision outcomes in accordance with writing genre and the frequency of draft.
      For the present study, 12 college students’ writing samples were collected according to the three genres of descriptive, explorative, and argumentative essays. Corrective feedback was given by the instructor two times on the 1st and 2nd drafts of the essays, and the students were asked to revise the drafts based on the feedback provided by the instructor. They had to produce three drafts for each genre. The grammatical errors they committed in writing were analyzed in the categories of genre, the frequency of draft, students’ revision behaviors (six types), and error types (13 types). The findings from the study were that corrective feedback was fairly conducive to the development of the EFL students’ writing accuracy, and that the students showed differing levels of progress through different error revision behaviors in their essay writing in terms of error types depending upon genre and the frequency of draft.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Krashen, S. D., "Writing: Research, theory, and application" Pergamon Press 1984

      2 Celce-Murcia, M., "Why it makes sense to teach grammar in context and through discourse, In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 119-133, 2002

      3 Sheppard, K., "Two feedback types: Do they make a difference?" 23 : 103-110, 1992

      4 Silva, T., "Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing : The ESL research and its implications" 27 : 657-675, 1993

      5 Ferris, D., "The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here?" 13 : 49-62, 2004

      6 Bitchener, J., "The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback" 12 : 409-431, 2008

      7 Hendrickson, J. M., "The treatment of error in written work" 64 : 216-221, 1980

      8 Long, M. H., "The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition, In Handbook of research on second language acquisition" Academic 413-468, 1996

      9 Reid, J. M., "The process of paragraph writing" Prentice Hall Regents 1994

      10 Leki, I., "The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes" 24 : 203-218, 1991

      1 Krashen, S. D., "Writing: Research, theory, and application" Pergamon Press 1984

      2 Celce-Murcia, M., "Why it makes sense to teach grammar in context and through discourse, In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 119-133, 2002

      3 Sheppard, K., "Two feedback types: Do they make a difference?" 23 : 103-110, 1992

      4 Silva, T., "Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing : The ESL research and its implications" 27 : 657-675, 1993

      5 Ferris, D., "The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here?" 13 : 49-62, 2004

      6 Bitchener, J., "The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback" 12 : 409-431, 2008

      7 Hendrickson, J. M., "The treatment of error in written work" 64 : 216-221, 1980

      8 Long, M. H., "The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition, In Handbook of research on second language acquisition" Academic 413-468, 1996

      9 Reid, J. M., "The process of paragraph writing" Prentice Hall Regents 1994

      10 Leki, I., "The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes" 24 : 203-218, 1991

      11 Krashen, S. D., "The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom" Pergamon Press 1983

      12 Krashen, S. D., "The input hypothesis: Issues and implications" Longman 1985

      13 Peyton, J. K., "The influence of writing task on ESL students’ written production, In Dialogue journals in the multilingual classroom: Building language fluency and writing skills through written interaction" Ablex Publishing 196-229, 1993

      14 Gu, S., "The impact of negative feedback, noticing, and modified output on EFL question development" 40 : 270-278, 2008

      15 Pawlak, M., "The feasibility of integrating form and meaning in the language classroom: A qualitative study of classroom discourse" 30-31 : 283-294, 2005

      16 Chandler, J., "The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing" 12 : 267-296, 2003

      17 Frantzen, D., "The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course" 79 : 329-344, 1995

      18 Chaney, S., "The effect of error types on error correction and revision" California State University 1999

      19 Truscott, J., "The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately" 16 : 292-305, 2007

      20 DeKeyser, R. M., "The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency" 77 : 501-514, 1993

      21 Bitchener, J., "The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing" 14 : 191-205, 2005

      22 Truscott, J., "The case for"the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes" : A response to Ferris" 8 : 111-122, 1999

      23 Ferris, D., "The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes : A response to Truscott" 8 : 1-10, 1999

      24 Truscott, J., "The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes" 46 : 327-369, 1996

      25 Hinkel, E., "Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar" Lawrence Erlbaum 2004

      26 Hedgcock, J., "Taking stock of research and pedagogy in L2 writing, In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 597-613, 2005

      27 Hinkel, E., "Second language writers’ text: Linguistic and rhetorical features" Lawrence Erlbaum 2002

      28 Gass, S., "Second language acquisition: An introductory course" Erlbaum 1994

      29 Robb, T., "Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality" 20 : 83-95, 1986

      30 Lalande, J. F. II., "Reducing composition errors: An experiment" 66 : 140-149, 1982

      31 Selinker, L., "Rediscovering interlanguage" Longman 1992

      32 Mukattash, L., "Persistence of fossilization" 24 : 187-203, 1986

      33 Panova, I., "Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom" 36 (36): 573-595, 2002

      34 Lin, Y-H., "Negative feedback incorporation among high-proficiency and low-proficiency Chinese-speaking learners of Spanish" 46 (46): 567-611, 1996

      35 Hino, J., "Linguistic information supplied by negative feedback: A study of its contribution to the process of second language acquisition" University of Pennsylvania 2006

      36 Dulay, H. C., "Language two" Oxford University Press 1982

      37 Brown, H. D., "Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices" Longman 2007

      38 Guenette, D., "Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing" 16 : 40-53, 2007

      39 Gass, S., "Input, interaction, and the second language learner" Erlbaum 1997

      40 McDonough, K., "Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development" 27 : 79-103, 2005

      41 Rutherford, W., "Grammar and second language teaching" Newbury House 1988

      42 Doughty, C., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 1998

      43 Hedgcock, J., "Feedback on feedback : Assessing learner receptivity in second language writing" 3 : 141-163, 1994

      44 Cohen, A. D., "Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports, In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom" Cambridge University Press 155-177, 1990

      45 Bitchener, J., "Evidence in support of written corrective feedback" 17 : 102-118, 2008

      46 Ferris, D., "Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?" 10 : 161-184, 2001

      47 Truscott, J., "Error correction, revision, and learning" 17 : 292-305, 2008

      48 Hendrickson, J. M., "Error correction in foreign language teaching : Recent theory, research, and practice" 62 : 387-398, 1978

      49 Semke, H. D., "Effects of the red pen" 17 : 195-202, 1984

      50 Hartshorn, K. J., "Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy" 44 (44): 84-109, 2010

      51 Ferris, D., "Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction, In Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues" Cambridge University Press 81-104, 2006

      52 Truscott, J., "Dialogue : Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction : A response to Chandler" 13 : 337-343, 2004

      53 Rutherford, W., "Consciousness-raising and universal grammar" 6 (6): 274-282, 1985

      54 Folse, K. S., "Blueprints 1: Composition skills for academic writing" Houghton Mifflin 2003

      55 Weigle, S. C., "Assessing writing" Cambridge University Press 2002

      56 Goring Kepner, C., "An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language skills" 75 : 305-313, 1991

      57 White, L., "Against comprehensible input" 8 (8): 95-110, 1987

      58 Ellis, R., "A typology of written corrective feedback types" 63 (63): 97-107, 2009

      59 Ellis, R., "A theory of instructed second language acquisition, In Implicit and explicit language learning" Academic Press 79-114, 1994

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.75 0.75 0.77
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.7 0.68 1.275 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼