RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    The Effect of KONEX Market Experience on IPO Performance

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108062758

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    [Purpose] On July 1, 2013, Korea Exchange (KRX) established Korea New Exchange (KONEX), a new stock exchange for start-up SMEs and venture companies. The KONEX market is aimed to help young SMEs with financing and development through the capital market. I investigate the impact of experience of Korea’s alternative exchange market, the Korea New Exchange (KONEX), on IPO performance when firms move their listing status from KONEX to the primary exchange market, Korean Securities Dealers Automated Quotation (KOSDAQ). As KONEX requires firms to provide public information through Nominated Advisors, investors can acquire firms’ reliable financial information more easily. Also, Korea Exchange enables KONEX firms to transfer their listing status from KONEX market to KOSDAQ market with eased requirements. It indicates that investors could have more prevailed information of the KONEX firms more easily before IPOs.
    [Methodology] Using 341 IPO firms (37 firms through KONEX) in KOSDAQ from 2014 to 2020, I investigate whether KONEX experience enhances IPO peroformance. More specifically, I investigate how KONEX experience affects the firms’ short-term and long-term IPO performance.
    [Findings] I find that KONEX Market experience has no effect on short-run performance of IPO.
    Rather, in 20 days and 30 days window, firms through KONEX market suffer more negative returns compared to firms directly listed on KOSDAQ. Expanding windows from short-run to long-run, I find that the firms with KONEX Market experience outperform to firms without that experience.
    [Implications] Therefore, this study provides the evidence that the firms with KONEX experience have better IPO performance in the long-run periods. In the short-run, KONEX firms are likely to be underperformed. It indicates that KONEX Market exposures reduce information asymmetry between investors. Also, it could be ‘Fast Track’ programs are well structured to provide opportunities to start-up or small-sized companies.
    번역하기

    [Purpose] On July 1, 2013, Korea Exchange (KRX) established Korea New Exchange (KONEX), a new stock exchange for start-up SMEs and venture companies. The KONEX market is aimed to help young SMEs with financing and development through the capital mar...

    [Purpose] On July 1, 2013, Korea Exchange (KRX) established Korea New Exchange (KONEX), a new stock exchange for start-up SMEs and venture companies. The KONEX market is aimed to help young SMEs with financing and development through the capital market. I investigate the impact of experience of Korea’s alternative exchange market, the Korea New Exchange (KONEX), on IPO performance when firms move their listing status from KONEX to the primary exchange market, Korean Securities Dealers Automated Quotation (KOSDAQ). As KONEX requires firms to provide public information through Nominated Advisors, investors can acquire firms’ reliable financial information more easily. Also, Korea Exchange enables KONEX firms to transfer their listing status from KONEX market to KOSDAQ market with eased requirements. It indicates that investors could have more prevailed information of the KONEX firms more easily before IPOs.
    [Methodology] Using 341 IPO firms (37 firms through KONEX) in KOSDAQ from 2014 to 2020, I investigate whether KONEX experience enhances IPO peroformance. More specifically, I investigate how KONEX experience affects the firms’ short-term and long-term IPO performance.
    [Findings] I find that KONEX Market experience has no effect on short-run performance of IPO.
    Rather, in 20 days and 30 days window, firms through KONEX market suffer more negative returns compared to firms directly listed on KOSDAQ. Expanding windows from short-run to long-run, I find that the firms with KONEX Market experience outperform to firms without that experience.
    [Implications] Therefore, this study provides the evidence that the firms with KONEX experience have better IPO performance in the long-run periods. In the short-run, KONEX firms are likely to be underperformed. It indicates that KONEX Market exposures reduce information asymmetry between investors. Also, it could be ‘Fast Track’ programs are well structured to provide opportunities to start-up or small-sized companies.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Rock, K, "Why new issues are underpriced" 15 (15): 187-212, 1986

    2 Kim, M., "Valuing IPOs" 53 : 409-438, 1999

    3 Carter, R., "Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and long-run performance of IPO stocks" 53 (53): 285-311, 1998

    4 Habib, M. A., "Underpricing and entrepreneurial wealth losses in IPOs: theory and evidence" 14 : 433-458, 2001

    5 Cho, J., "The venture capital certification role in R&D: Evidence from IPO underpricing in Korea" 23 : 83-108, 2013

    6 Muscarella, C. J., "The underpricing of “second” initial public offerings" 12 (12): 183-192, 1989

    7 Kim, K., "The puzzling increase in underpricing of seasoned equity offerings" 39 : 343-365, 2004

    8 Loughran, T., "The new issue puzzle" 50 (50): 23-51, 1995

    9 Ritter, J. R, "The long-run performance of initial public offerings" 46 (46): 3-27, 1991

    10 Hong, H. A., "The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on IPOs in global capital markets" 89 (89): 1365-1397, 2014

    1 Rock, K, "Why new issues are underpriced" 15 (15): 187-212, 1986

    2 Kim, M., "Valuing IPOs" 53 : 409-438, 1999

    3 Carter, R., "Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and long-run performance of IPO stocks" 53 (53): 285-311, 1998

    4 Habib, M. A., "Underpricing and entrepreneurial wealth losses in IPOs: theory and evidence" 14 : 433-458, 2001

    5 Cho, J., "The venture capital certification role in R&D: Evidence from IPO underpricing in Korea" 23 : 83-108, 2013

    6 Muscarella, C. J., "The underpricing of “second” initial public offerings" 12 (12): 183-192, 1989

    7 Kim, K., "The puzzling increase in underpricing of seasoned equity offerings" 39 : 343-365, 2004

    8 Loughran, T., "The new issue puzzle" 50 (50): 23-51, 1995

    9 Ritter, J. R, "The long-run performance of initial public offerings" 46 (46): 3-27, 1991

    10 Hong, H. A., "The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on IPOs in global capital markets" 89 (89): 1365-1397, 2014

    11 Ritter, J. R, "The hot issue market of 1980" 57 (57): 215-240, 1984

    12 Ross, S. A., "The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signalling approach" 23-40, 1977

    13 Corwin, S, "The determinants of underpricing for seasoned equity offers" 58 (58): 2249-2279, 2003

    14 Ritter, J. R, "The costs of going public" 19 (19): 269-281, 1987

    15 Certo T. S., "Signaling firm value through board structure: An investigation of initial public offerings" 26 : 33-50, 2001

    16 Downes, D. H., "Signaling and the valuation of unseasoned new issues" 37 (37): 1-10, 1982

    17 Ibbotson, R. G, "Price performance of common stock new issues" 3 : 235-272, 1975

    18 Venkataraman, R., "Litigation risk, audit quality, and audit fees: Evidence from initial public offerings" 83 (83): 1315-1345, 2008

    19 "KRX"

    20 Beatty, R., "Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings" 15 : 213-232, 1986

    21 Carter, R., "Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation" 45 (45): 1045-1068, 1990

    22 Leland, H. E., "Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation" 32 : 371-387, 1977

    23 Spence, M, "Informational aspects of market structure: an introduction" 90 (90): 591-597, 1976

    24 Ljungqvist, A. P, "IPO underpricing. In Handbook of Corporate Finance, Volume 1:Empirical Corporate Finance" Elsevier/North Holland 375-422, 2007

    25 Boulton, T., "Earnings quality and international IPO underpricing" 86 : 483-505, 2011

    26 Mola, S., "Discounting and clustering in seasoned equity offering prices" 39 (39): 1-24, 2004

    27 Dechow, P., "Detecting earnings management" 70 (70): 193-225, 1995

    28 Filatotchev, I., "Board composition, share ownership, and underpricing of U.K. IPO firms" 23 : 941-955, 2002

    29 Beatty, R. P, "Auditor reputation and the pricing of initial public offerings" 64 (64): 693-709, 1989

    30 Bédard, J., "Audit committee, underpricing of IPOs, and accuracy of management earnings forecasts" 16 (16): 519-535, 2008

    31 Bowen, R., "Analyst coverage and the cost of raising equity capital: Evidence from underpricing of seasoned equity offerings" 25 (25): 657-699, 2008

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-02-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea International Accounting Review KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.76 0.76 0.85
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.88 0.85 1.497 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼