RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    복합적 군사위협에 대응하기 위한 군사력 건설의 방향 = Perspective on Military Build-up to Cope with Hybrid Military Threat

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82503231

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    After the Cold War, main reason of international conflicts has changed from ``regular warfare between sovereign states`` to ``instability in the so-called failed states`` and ``military intervention of major powers to disputed regions``. Especially, small states and insurgency groups are pursuing untraditional and asymmetric tactics and weapons to neutralize major powers` military superiority. As a result, the concept of ``hybrid military threat``, which includes diverse tactics and weapons as well as conventional military forces for regular warfare, is coming to realize nowadays. This phenomenon leads to debates on future of war, military strategy, and perspective on military build-up to cope with more diverse military threats. These perspectives can be categorized as 1) Traditional Vision, 2) Untraditional Vision, 3) Complex Vision, and 4) Division of labor Vision. Korea is also facing hybrid military threat. Firstly, threat from North Korea is becoming more and more diversified to irregular warfare, local infiltration & provocation such as ``Cheon An`` incident, and Weapons of Mass Destruction, not only massive conventional forces for full-scale invasion. And secondly, Korea can no longer neglect military threats from neighboring major powers` naval and aerospace build-up, and uncertain powers such as terrorist group. Therefore, in order to cope with hybrid military threat more effectively, Korea needs to pursue a military build-up based on the ``Division of labor Vision``, which develops specialized military capabilities according to diverse threats within each armed branches.
    번역하기

    After the Cold War, main reason of international conflicts has changed from ``regular warfare between sovereign states`` to ``instability in the so-called failed states`` and ``military intervention of major powers to disputed regions``. Especially, s...

    After the Cold War, main reason of international conflicts has changed from ``regular warfare between sovereign states`` to ``instability in the so-called failed states`` and ``military intervention of major powers to disputed regions``. Especially, small states and insurgency groups are pursuing untraditional and asymmetric tactics and weapons to neutralize major powers` military superiority. As a result, the concept of ``hybrid military threat``, which includes diverse tactics and weapons as well as conventional military forces for regular warfare, is coming to realize nowadays. This phenomenon leads to debates on future of war, military strategy, and perspective on military build-up to cope with more diverse military threats. These perspectives can be categorized as 1) Traditional Vision, 2) Untraditional Vision, 3) Complex Vision, and 4) Division of labor Vision. Korea is also facing hybrid military threat. Firstly, threat from North Korea is becoming more and more diversified to irregular warfare, local infiltration & provocation such as ``Cheon An`` incident, and Weapons of Mass Destruction, not only massive conventional forces for full-scale invasion. And secondly, Korea can no longer neglect military threats from neighboring major powers` naval and aerospace build-up, and uncertain powers such as terrorist group. Therefore, in order to cope with hybrid military threat more effectively, Korea needs to pursue a military build-up based on the ``Division of labor Vision``, which develops specialized military capabilities according to diverse threats within each armed branches.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 윤석준, "천안함 사태와 한국 해군력 발전" (146) : 2010

    2 윤형노, "주변국 대함유도탄 개발 추세 및 시사점" (1279) : 2009

    3 추승호, "전작권 2015년 12월 전환...3년 7개월 연기"

    4 김민석, "이지스함 2척 + 독도함 + 잠수함…해군 첫 기동전단 떴다"

    5 박경일, "세계안보의 관점과 전략" 창조문화 2009

    6 김귀근, "북한의 사이버전 능력은"

    7 이민룡, "김정일 시대의 북한군대 해부" 황금알 2004

    8 국방부, "국방백서 2008" 국방부 2009

    9 김귀근, "北 해안포, 서해5도. 함정 사격권"

    10 황일도, "北 장사정포 알려지지 않은 다섯 가지 진실"

    1 윤석준, "천안함 사태와 한국 해군력 발전" (146) : 2010

    2 윤형노, "주변국 대함유도탄 개발 추세 및 시사점" (1279) : 2009

    3 추승호, "전작권 2015년 12월 전환...3년 7개월 연기"

    4 김민석, "이지스함 2척 + 독도함 + 잠수함…해군 첫 기동전단 떴다"

    5 박경일, "세계안보의 관점과 전략" 창조문화 2009

    6 김귀근, "북한의 사이버전 능력은"

    7 이민룡, "김정일 시대의 북한군대 해부" 황금알 2004

    8 국방부, "국방백서 2008" 국방부 2009

    9 김귀근, "北 해안포, 서해5도. 함정 사격권"

    10 황일도, "北 장사정포 알려지지 않은 다섯 가지 진실"

    11 Dunlap, Charles A., "We Still Need the Big Guns" 9 : 2008

    12 U.S Department of Defense, "The National Defense Strategy of the United States of America" U.S Department of Defense 2005

    13 Horowitz, Michael C., "The Future of War and American Military Strategy" 53 (53): 2009

    14 Duplessis, Brian P., "The Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea: Conventional or Hybrid Military Threat?"

    15 O'Hanlon, Michael, "Stopping a North Korean Invasion: Why Defending South Korea is Easier Than the Pentagon Thinks" 22 (22): 1998

    16 Jung Sung-Ki, "Seoul Backs UAV Efforts for Command Transfer" 17 : 2010

    17 Jung Sung-Ki, "S. Korea Refocuses Planning on Threat From North" 31 : 2010

    18 U.S Department of Defense, "Quadrennial Defense Review Report" U.S Department of Defense 2010

    19 McMaster, H.R., "On War: Lessons to be Learned" 50 (50): 2008

    20 Bermudez, Joseph S., "Moving Missiles" 3 : 2005

    21 Conway, James T., "Marine Corps Vision and Strategy 2025" Quantico 2008

    22 Peters, Ralph, "Lessons from Lebanon: The New Model Terrorist Army" 2006

    23 Hughes, Christopher W., "Japan's Remilitarisation" Routledge 2009

    24 Saunders, Stephen, "Jane's Fighting Ships. 2008-2009 Surrey" Jane's Information Group 2009

    25 Hammes, Thomas X., "Insurgency: Modern Warfare Evolves into a Fourth Generation" (214) : 2005

    26 Hoffman, Frank G., "Hybrid Warfare and Challenges" 52 (52): 2009

    27 Fisher Jr., Richard D., "China's Military Modernization: Building for Regional and Global Reach" Praeger Security International 2008

    28 Krepinevich, Andrew F., "An Army at the Crossroads: Strategy for the Long Haul" Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment 2008

    29 Gray, Colin S., "After Iraq: The Search for a Sustainable National Security Strategy" U.S Amy War College 2009

    30 Hoehn, Andrew R., "A New Division of Labor Meeting America's Security Challenges Beyond Iraq" Santa Monica 2007

    31 권태영, "21세기 군사혁신의 명암과 우리 군의 선택" 도서출판 전광 2009

    32 진성훈, "2020년 우리 전투기로 하늘 지킨다"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-08-22 학회명변경 영문명 : Research Institute On National Security Affairs -> Research Institute for National Security Affairs KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.69 0.61 0.972 0.29
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼