인적자원체계 특성이 지식집중도에 미치는 영향에 관한 다층분석

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As the industrial society moves to the post industrial society, and then to the knowledge society, people pay attention to organizations with intangible assets. Therefore, in order to explicate a management system of organizations based on intangible assets, we pursue to HR system of knowledge intensive organizations, which is measured by empirically developed knowledge intensiveness of work in organizations. Empirical results are as follows: First, the HLM analysis shows that there was statistically significant variation in the mean of knowledge intensiveness, and in the slopes of collaboration of work across organizations when regressed on gender, age, education and career in each organization. Second, the next step in the HLM analysis shows that the impact of human resource system characteristics on the levels of work collaboration was stronger in organizations with flexible work system, organic compensation system and activity based development sytem. These results imply, first, it is necessary to focus on work collaboration in knowledge intensive work, in order to more parsimonious scale of knowledge intensity. Second, it must be supported by compensation strategy based Burns & Stalker(1961)’s organic theory, and organic compensation system must be supported by culture, HRM systems included on employee selection system, career development, and so on, in order to elevate knowledge intensiveness in organization. Therefore further research will be necessary to multi-level analysis of relationship among knowledge intensiveness, employee attitudes at individual focus and HR systems at organizational focus.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이동진·이영면, "지식집중도와 인적자원체계 특성 사이의 관계에 대한 실증연구" 성균관대학교 대학원 2008

2 이동진, "지식집중도 구성요인의 구조적 관계에 관한 실증연구" 한국인사·조직학회 18 (18): 31-66, 2010

3 이동진, "지식집중도 개발에 관한 실증연구" 한국인적자원관리학회 16 : 247-266, 2009

4 Sveiby, K, "지식시대의 조직 이렇게 키워라" 미래경영개발연구원 2005

5 이동진, "조직특성과 구성원 개인특성 변수가 지식집중도에 미치는 영향에 관한 다층분석 : 조직구조와 문화를 중심으로" 한국인사·조직학회 18 (18): 103-139, 2010

6 이동진, "인적자원체계 특성과 개인특성이 지식집중도에 미치는 영향에 관한 다층분석" 2009

7 이순묵, "사회과학을 위한 측정의 원리" 학지사 2002

8 박원우, "레벨이슈(Level Issue)의 의미, 현상 및 해결방안" 한국인사·조직학회 11 (11): 199-233, 2003

9 황규대, "경쟁우위 달성을 위한 전략적 인적자원관리" 박영사 2007

10 Carnevale,D.G, "Trustworthy Government: Leadership and ManagementStrategies for Building Trust and High Performance" Jossey-Bass 1995

11 Turner, K.L, "The Role of Organizational Controls inManaging Knowledge" 31 (31): 197-217, 2006

12 Appelbaum, E, "The New American Workplace: TransformingWork Systems in the United States" ILR Press 1994

13 Burns, T, "The Management of Innovation" Tavistock 1961

14 Allee,V, "The Knowledge Evolution: Expanding Organizational Intelligence" Butterworth-Heinemann 1999

15 Felin, T, "The Knowledge Based View, Nested Heterogeneity,and New Value Creation: Philosophical Considerations on The Locus of Knowledge" 32 (32): 195-218, 2007

16 Lepak, D.P, "The Human Resource Architecture: Toward ATheory of Human Capital Allocation and Development" 24 (24): 31-48, 1999

17 Becker, B.E, "The Differentiated Workforce:Transforming Talent into Strategic Impact" Harvard Business Press 2009

18 Drucker,P, "The Coming of The New Organization" 66 (66): 45-53, 1988

19 Alvesson, M, "The Best and The Brightest: TheConstruction, Significance and Effects of Elite Identities in Consulting Firms" 13 (13): 195-224, 2006

20 Alvesson,M, "Talking in Organizations: Managing Identity and Impressionsin an Advertising Agency" 15 (15): 535-563, 1994

21 Willmott,H, "Strength is Ignorance; Slavery is Freedom: Managing Culturein Modern Organization" 30 (30): 515-552, 1993

22 Alvesson,M, "Social Identity and The Problem of Loyalty in KnowledgeIntensive Companies" 37 (37): 1101-1123, 2000

23 Swart, J, "Sharing Knowledge in Knowledge Intensive Firms" 13 (13): 60-75, 2003

24 Zack,M, "Rethinking the Knowledge Based Organization" 44 (44): 67-71, 2003

25 Nunnally, J.C, "Psychometric Theory" McGraw-Hill 1994

26 Heneman III, H, "Personnel/HumanResource Management" Irwin 1989

27 Alvesson,M, "Organizations as Rhetoric: Knowledge Intensive Firms andthe Struggle with Ambiguity" 30 (30): 997-1015, 1993

28 Lawrence, P.R, "Organization and Environment" Irwin 1969

29 Daft,R.L, "Organization Theory and Design"

30 Grimshaw, D, "New Human Resource Management Practicesin Knowledge Intensive Business Services Firms: The Case of Outsourcingwith Staff Transfer" 62 (62): 1521-1550, 2009

31 Gerhart, B, "Measurement Errorin Research on Human Resources and Firm Performance: How Much Error isThere and How Does It Influence Effect Size Estimates" 53 (53): 803-834, 2000

32 Appelbaum, E, "Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off" CornellUniversity Press 2000

33 Winch, G, "Managing The Knowledge-Based Organization:The Case of Architectural Practice" 30 (30): 923-937, 1993

34 Sveiby, K, "Managing Knowhow: Add Value by Valuing Creativity" Bloomsbury 1987

35 Jackson, S, "Managing Human Resource: Through Strategic Partnerships"

36 Schuler, R, "Linking Competitive Strategy with HumanResource Management Practices" 9 (9): 207-219, 1987

37 Klein, K.J, "Level Issues in Theory Development,Data Collection, and Analysis" 19 (19): 195-229, 1994

38 Starbuck,W, "Learning by Knowledge Intensive Firms" 29 (29): 713-740, 1992

39 Blackler,F, "Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overviewand Interpretation" 16 (16): 1021-1046, 1995

40 Blackler,F, "Knowledge and The Theory of Organizations: Organizations asActivity System and The Reframing of Management" 30 (30): 863-884, 1993

41 Alvesson,M, "Knowledge Work: Ambiguity, Images and Identity" 54 (54): 863-886, 2001

42 Alvesson,M, "Knowledge Work and Knowledge Intensive Firms" Oxford University Press 2004

43 Swart, J, "Knowledge Intensive Firms: The Influence of theClient on HR Systems" 13 (13): 37-55, 2003

44 Zuboff,S, "In the Age of the Smart Machine: the Future of Work and Power" Basic Books 1988

45 Lengnick-Hall, M.L, "Human Resource Managementin the Knowledge Economy: New Challenges"

46 Raudenbush, S, "Hierarchical Linear Model: Application and Data Analysis" Sage 2002

47 Raudenbush, S, "HLM 5:Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modelling"

48 Robertson, M, "Going Public: The Emergence and Effects of SoftBureaucracy Within a Knowledge Intensive Firm" 11 (11): 123-148, 2004

49 Nemetz, P, "Flexible Manufacturing Organizations: Implications forStrategy Formulation and Organization Design" 13 (13): 627-638, 1988

50 Bennett, R.J, "Development of a Measure of Workplace Deviance" 85 (85): 349-360, 2000

51 Robertson, M, "Control-What Control? Culture and AmbiguityWithin a Knowledge Intensive Firm" 40 (40): 831-858, 2003

52 Gomez-Mejia, L.R, "Compensation Strategy: AnOverview and Future Steps, In HumanResource Management: Perspectives, Context, Function and Outcome" Prentice-Hall 291-306, 1996

53 Huselid, M.A, "Comment On "Measurement Error in Researchon Human Resources and Firm Performance: How Much Error is There and How Does It Influence Effect Size Estimates?" by Gerhart, Wright,McMahan, and Snell" 53 (53): 835-854, 2000

54 Duncan,R, "Characteristics of Organizational Environment and PercievedEnvironmental Uncertainty" 17 (17): 313-327, 1972

55 Perrow,C, "A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations" 32 : 194-208, 1967