RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      EFL Learners’ Beliefs and Learning Style Preferences:Links to Proficiency

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103538224

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study explored EFL learners’ beliefs and perceptual learning style preferences. It also examined the relationship between these beliefs and preferences and their actual proficiency. The participants consisted of 78 college students, aged 21 to...

      This study explored EFL learners’ beliefs and perceptual learning style preferences. It also examined the relationship between these beliefs and preferences and their actual proficiency. The participants consisted of 78
      college students, aged 21 to 27, from different majors. According to the scores achieved on an English proficiency test, they were placed into two groups (proficient and less-proficient) and asked to respond to a self-report questionnaire in class. The results showed that: (1) the great majority of participants under-rated their own proficiency level; (2) proficient learners were much more likely to believe that anyone can learn to speak English and that if they heard someone speaking English, they would approach them to practice; (3) a few of the less-proficient learners were still not aware of the structural differences between Korean and English; (4) less-proficient learners were much more likely to believe that the most important part of EFL learning is learning a lot of grammar rules; (5) the participants of both groups marked all six learning styles (i.e. visual, tactile, auditory, kinesthetic, group, and individual) as major preferences; but (6) the proficient learners demonstrated a significantly greater preference for tactile and kinesthetic learning styles than the less-proficient learners did.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. INTRODUCTION
      • II. LITERATURE REVIEW
      • III. METHOD
      • IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
      • V. CONCLUSION
      • I. INTRODUCTION
      • II. LITERATURE REVIEW
      • III. METHOD
      • IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
      • V. CONCLUSION
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼