地域發展을 위한 田園住宅地 開發 方案에 관한 硏究 : 경기도 양평군 서종면의 사례를 중심으로 = (A) study on Development for Region Economic of the Second House Area

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

1990's can be divided from 1980's by various aspects. Especially, the advent of the Second House is the most specific point in residential part. Because the Second House symbolizes not only simply the changes of residential style as a social, cultural side and an alternation from city oriented resident area to rural oriented as a spatial one. Increase of national income and concern about life quality of residential style, more than physical side. Moreover, we have a tendency to get interest about the quality of house itself and residential area which has natural and social circumstances. A house which is placed in urban area has a approachability and a lot of facilities. But the quality of environment factors are very poor. the desire for better life with pleasant circumstances is a men's basic instinct. So, the advent of the Second House should be understood as like this view.
From late 1980's, new residential style has been appeared in Korea. An expression aspect of the Second House has a meaning of society, time and space. That is to say, the social phenomenon means a special people's escape from city life, the changes of residential zone condition and a development of suburban area to live. There are economic and institutional elements and the changes of life style in a backgrounds of the phenomenon.
Even though the metropolitan area is a good place to develop for the Second House, the masterplan is so insufficient. So, nowadays, an efficient application of the Second House area has a lot of environmental pollution matters. Because all the areas are located in the grounds sites of a development restricted area and a waterworks protective zone. To solve these problems, we should develop the surroundings of rivers and reservoir, and also change mountain district centered developing patters of the second house and endeavor to make various ground sites and facilities. But still, not like common real properties, development and ownership of rural residents ground sites is very restricted.
Based upon the analysis of location of the Second Houses which are able to develop in metropolitan area, we should understand various restrictions, many terms that influence the development of ground sites and the problem of environment and restriction, to grasp the improvement plans and correct those problems.
Nowadays in Korea, according to the changes in social circumstances and increase of national income, desires of leisure rose and the preference of good habitats changed. Due to these facts, demand and interest of the Second House have risen. But compare to the high demand, the supply is insufficient and because of the high price of rural residents, social status that satisfies those demands is restricted.
In prevention of speculating real property, the government is being negative in activating ground site of the Second House by strictly applying real property related laws. But to solve the housing shortage in Seoul and other large cities, the government should deal flexibly with policies of related laws, such as supporting taxes in rural residents, and try to disperse the city population and effectively develop the country.
This research is made for the problems and improvements of legal administration and utilization of developing the Second House.
This is especially researched for the problems in administration and utilization by analyzing the selection of the Second House ground site, acquisition, and the possibilities of developing and also examined improving plans to make up pleasant habitat by activating the Second House.
This research, by presenting development and improvement plans for the Second House, is trying to contribute to making good use of land and effective administration of the Second House. In the future, there should be some related specific example and method of research. And the central government, the local self-government and institutions related in this field should have more interest in policy.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제 1장. 서론 = 1
• 제1절. 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
• 제2절. 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 4
• 1. 연구의 범위 = 4
• 2. 연구의 방법 = 5
• 제 2장. 전원주택의 이론적 배경과 기능 = 6
• 제1절. 전원주택의 일반적 정의 = 6
• 1. 전원주택의 개념 = 6
• 2. 전원주택의 특징 = 8
• 3. 전원주택의 입지 요건 = 8
• 제2절. 전원주택의 기능과 종류 = 11
• 1. 전원주택의 기능과 역할 = 12
• (1) 전원주택의 기능 = 12
• (2) 전원주택의 역할 = 14
• 2. 전원주택의 분류 방법 = 17
• (1) 개발방식에 따른 분류 = 17
• (2) 규모에 따른 분류 = 18
• (3) 입지에 따른 분류 = 20
• (4) 건축자재에 따른 분류 = 22
• 제3절. 전원주택 형성의 사회 경제적 배경 = 25
• 1. 거주지의 광역적 확산 = 27
• 2. 소비주체의 생활양식 변화 = 28
• 3. 과밀도시화에 따른 주택상품의 다양화 = 30
• 제4절. 국내 외의 전원주택 개발 사례 = 32
• 1. 영국의 전원주택에 관한 연구 = 33
• 2. 프랑스의 전원주택에 관한 연구 = 34
• 3. 미국의 전원주택에 관한 연구 = 34
• 4. 일본의 전원주택에 관한 연구 = 36
• 5. 우리 나라의 전원주택에 관한 연구 = 37
• 제 3 장. 전원주택 부지의 취득방법과 현황 = 40
• 제1절. 전원주택의 수급현황 = 40
• 1. 전원주택의 필요성 = 41
• (1) 주거환경의 질에 대한 관심 = 42
• (2) 여가 선용 = 44
• (3) 부동산 소유의식 증가 = 46
• (4) 서울시 주택공급의 한계 = 47
• (5) 인구이동 = 48
• 2. 새로운 주거유형의 개발 필요성 = 51
• 제2절. 전원주택 부지구입 방법 = 54
• 1. 부지 선정에 있어서 일반적인 고려 사항 = 54
• 2. 단지화된 부지의 선택 = 56
• 제3절. 부지 획득에 따른 관계 법규 분석 = 57
• 1. 농지전용 허가 절차 = 57
• 2. 대체농지 조성비와 농지전용 부담금 = 60
• 3. 삼림 형질변경 절차 = 62
• 4. 각종 세제상 절차 분석 = 65
• 제 4장. 경기도 양평군 서종면의 사례 분석 = 68
• 제1절. 일반현황 = 68
• 1. 위치 및 행정구역 = 68
• 2. 지형 및 기후 = 71
• 제2절. 전원주택지 조성현황 = 77
• 1. 수도권 전원주택단지 현황 = 77
• 2. 양평군 서종면 지역 전원주택단지 현황 = 79
• 제3절. 전원주택으로 지역경제 활성화 = 81
• 1. 수도권 전원주택지 경제성 = 81
• 2. 양평군 서종면 지역 전원주택지 경제성 = 82
• 제 5장. 전원주택 부지 개발에 관한 문제점 및 개선방안 = 83
• 제1절. 전원주택 부지 개발에 관한 문제점 = 83
• 1. 법제상의 문제점 = 83
• (1) 개발 관련법제 = 83
• (2) 소유권 관련법제 = 88
• 2. 환경적 측면에서의 문제점 = 90
• 제2절. 전원주택 개발에 관한 개선방안 = 91
• 1. 법제의 정비 = 92
• (1) 개발관련법제의 정비 = 92
• (2) 소유권 관련법제의 정비 = 93
• 2. 환경적 측면에서 개선 방안 = 94
• 제 6장. 결론 = 97
• 참고문헌 = 100
• Abstract = 103