RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    인지적 정서조절 전략과 우울 및 불안과의 관계에 대한 메타분석 = A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Depression and Anxiety

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109907333

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study conducted a meta-analysis to examine the correlations between cognitive emotion regulation strategies (CERS) and symptoms of depression and anxiety, focusing on the CERS proposed by Garnefski et al. (2001), and to identify moderating variables that affect these relationships. A total of 65 domestic studies published between 2007 and March 2024 were analyzed. As a result, catastrophizing showed the largest effect size for both depression and anxiety. Rumination, self-blame, positive reappraisal, refocusing on planning, positive refocusing, putting into perspective, and other-blame showed moderate effects, while acceptance showed a small or non-significant effect. A significant moderating effect was found only between refocusing on planning and anxiety depending on the study population. Based on these findings, the potential for application in counseling interventions and directions for future research are discussed.
    번역하기

    This study conducted a meta-analysis to examine the correlations between cognitive emotion regulation strategies (CERS) and symptoms of depression and anxiety, focusing on the CERS proposed by Garnefski et al. (2001), and to identify moderating variab...

    This study conducted a meta-analysis to examine the correlations between cognitive emotion regulation strategies (CERS) and symptoms of depression and anxiety, focusing on the CERS proposed by Garnefski et al. (2001), and to identify moderating variables that affect these relationships. A total of 65 domestic studies published between 2007 and March 2024 were analyzed. As a result, catastrophizing showed the largest effect size for both depression and anxiety. Rumination, self-blame, positive reappraisal, refocusing on planning, positive refocusing, putting into perspective, and other-blame showed moderate effects, while acceptance showed a small or non-significant effect. A significant moderating effect was found only between refocusing on planning and anxiety depending on the study population. Based on these findings, the potential for application in counseling interventions and directions for future research are discussed.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼