RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국 회사법의 변천과 발전과제-M&A법제의 최근 동향을 중심으로- = The Changes and Development Issues in the Korean Corporate Law -Focusing on the Recent Regulatory Trends in M&A Activities-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100046079

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Due to political and economic uncertainties since 2012, the total value of global M&A deals in 2013 decreased about 6 percent compared with the previous year. However, the number and scope of deals increased 15 percent in the U.S. and emerging markets and, especially, 28 percent of cross-border transactions were accomplished in Asian markets. Moreover, analysts and dealmakers argue that 2014 has all the fundamental ingredients to be a heyday in M&A activities due to low interest rates, macroeconomic stability, high levels of cash on corporate balance sheets and a banking sector eager to lend. Considering the above trend and the fact that South Korea ranked second in M&A attractiveness in global M&A market, we need to refine our regulations regarding M&A activities in order to reflect intra and international economic reality. In this context, this articles starts with briefly introducing 52-years of legislative history of the Korean Commercial Code, broadly views M&A-related regulations under the Korean corporate law and explores the regulatory environment in the U.S. which is one of the major M&A regulatory schemes in the world in order to draw implications and improvement issues under our system. As a result, despite general similarity to the U.S. system, there are comparatively many limitations in making defensive tactics in response to hostile bids under the Korean law. In addition, it seems that research and legal consideration about deal protection measures are need to be more developed. Therefore, this article suggests and recommends some ideas to reform our regulatory system in hostile and friendly takeover contexts as a conclusion.
    번역하기

    Due to political and economic uncertainties since 2012, the total value of global M&A deals in 2013 decreased about 6 percent compared with the previous year. However, the number and scope of deals increased 15 percent in the U.S. and emerging markets...

    Due to political and economic uncertainties since 2012, the total value of global M&A deals in 2013 decreased about 6 percent compared with the previous year. However, the number and scope of deals increased 15 percent in the U.S. and emerging markets and, especially, 28 percent of cross-border transactions were accomplished in Asian markets. Moreover, analysts and dealmakers argue that 2014 has all the fundamental ingredients to be a heyday in M&A activities due to low interest rates, macroeconomic stability, high levels of cash on corporate balance sheets and a banking sector eager to lend. Considering the above trend and the fact that South Korea ranked second in M&A attractiveness in global M&A market, we need to refine our regulations regarding M&A activities in order to reflect intra and international economic reality. In this context, this articles starts with briefly introducing 52-years of legislative history of the Korean Commercial Code, broadly views M&A-related regulations under the Korean corporate law and explores the regulatory environment in the U.S. which is one of the major M&A regulatory schemes in the world in order to draw implications and improvement issues under our system. As a result, despite general similarity to the U.S. system, there are comparatively many limitations in making defensive tactics in response to hostile bids under the Korean law. In addition, it seems that research and legal consideration about deal protection measures are need to be more developed. Therefore, this article suggests and recommends some ideas to reform our regulatory system in hostile and friendly takeover contexts as a conclusion.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 임홍근, "한국 상법전 50년사" 법문사 2013

    2 권종호, "적대적 M&A와 회사법개정" 한국기업법학회 20 (20): 67-94, 2006

    3 권종호, "적대적 M&A방어수단의 도입 필요성 - 2008년 경영권방어법제 개선위원회의 입법초안을 중심으로 -" 한국상사판례학회 22 (22): 257-288, 2009

    4 노혁준, "소수주주 축출제도의 도입에 관한 연구 - 도입형태와 가격산정을 중심으로-" 한국상사법학회 26 (26): 231-271, 2008

    5 서울중앙지방법원, "서울중앙지방법원 2008.6.2. 선고 2008카합1167"

    6 서완석, "상법상의 소수주주 축출제도 -소수주식 강제매수제도와 교부금 합병제도를 중심으로-" 한국상사법학회 30 (30): 385-443, 2011

    7 정찬형, "상법강의(상)" 박영사 2014

    8 김태진, "미국 법제하에서의 적대적 M&A 방어방법의 한국 법제하에서의 활용가능성" 한국증권법학회 8 (8): 309-341, 2007

    9 대법원, "대법원 2005.7.22. 선고 2005다602"

    10 "Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co., 493 A.2d 946"

    1 임홍근, "한국 상법전 50년사" 법문사 2013

    2 권종호, "적대적 M&A와 회사법개정" 한국기업법학회 20 (20): 67-94, 2006

    3 권종호, "적대적 M&A방어수단의 도입 필요성 - 2008년 경영권방어법제 개선위원회의 입법초안을 중심으로 -" 한국상사판례학회 22 (22): 257-288, 2009

    4 노혁준, "소수주주 축출제도의 도입에 관한 연구 - 도입형태와 가격산정을 중심으로-" 한국상사법학회 26 (26): 231-271, 2008

    5 서울중앙지방법원, "서울중앙지방법원 2008.6.2. 선고 2008카합1167"

    6 서완석, "상법상의 소수주주 축출제도 -소수주식 강제매수제도와 교부금 합병제도를 중심으로-" 한국상사법학회 30 (30): 385-443, 2011

    7 정찬형, "상법강의(상)" 박영사 2014

    8 김태진, "미국 법제하에서의 적대적 M&A 방어방법의 한국 법제하에서의 활용가능성" 한국증권법학회 8 (8): 309-341, 2007

    9 대법원, "대법원 2005.7.22. 선고 2005다602"

    10 "Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co., 493 A.2d 946"

    11 "Unitrin, Inc. v. American General Corp., 651 A.2d 1361"

    12 Afra Afsharipour, "Transforming the Allocation of Deal Risk Through Reverse Termination Fee" 63 : 1161-, 2010

    13 Lucian Arye Bebchuk, "The Powerful Anti-takeover Force of Staggered Boards: Theory, Evidence, and Policy" 54 : 887-, 2002

    14 Bradley R. Aronstam, "The Interplay of Blasius and Unocal—A Compelling Problem Justifying the Call for Substantial Change" 81 : 429-, 2002

    15 John Armour, "The Evloution of Hostile Takeover Regimes in the Developed and Emering Markets: An Analytical Framework" 52 : 219-, 2011

    16 Sean J. Griffith, "The Costs and Beneifts of Precommitment: An Appraisal of Omnicare v. NCS Healthcare" 29 : 569-, 2004

    17 Albert O. Saulsbury, "The Availability of Takeover Defenses and Deal Protection Devices for Anglo-American Target Companies" 37 : 115-, 2012

    18 "Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173"

    19 Christina M. Sautter, "Rethinking Contractual Limits on Fiduciary Duties" 38 : 55-, 2010

    20 Dennis J. Block, "Public Company M&A: Recent Developments in Corporate Control, Protective Mechanisms and Other Deal Protection Techniques" PLI Corp. Law & Practice 2008

    21 "Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co., 1999 WL 1054255"

    22 "Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network Inc., 637 A.2d 34"

    23 "Paramount Communication, Inc. v. Time, Inc., 571 A.2d 1140"

    24 "Omnicare, Inc. v. NCS Healthcare, Inc., 818 A.2d 914"

    25 정윤모, "M&A제도의 정합성제고" 지식경제부ㆍ대한상공회의소 2008

    26 송종준, "M&A법제의 현황과 보완과제" 2005

    27 김화진, "M&A 법제의 현황과 과제" 한국법학원 (101) : 5-18, 2007

    28 "Lyondell Chem. Co. v. Ryan, 970 A.2d 235"

    29 "In re Topps Co. Shareholders Litigation, 926 A.2d 58"

    30 "In re Lear Corp. Shareholder Litigation, 926 A.2d 94"

    31 "In re IXC Communications, Inc. Shareholders Litigation, C.A. Nos. 17324, 17334, 1999 Del. Ch. LEXIS 210, 11-14"

    32 Alexandros Seretakis, "Hostile Takeovers and Defensive Mechanisms in the United Kingdom and the United States: A Case against the United States Regime" 8 : 245-, 2013

    33 William B. Chandler III, "Hostile M&A and the Poison Pill in Japan: A Judicial Perspective" 2004 : 45-, 2004

    34 Harry G. Hutchison, "Director Primacy and Corporate Governance: Shareholder Voting Rights Captured by the Accountability/Authority Paradigm" 36 : 1111-, 2005

    35 Sean J. Griffith, "Deal Protection Provisions in the Last Period of Play" 71 : 1899-, 2003

    36 Andreas M. Fleckner, "Comparative Corporate Governance: A Functional and International Analysis" 2013

    37 Samuel C. Thompson, Jr., "Business Planning for Mergers and Acquisitions—Corporate, Securities, Tax, Antitrust, International and Related Aspects" 2008

    38 "Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805"

    39 "Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. Airgas Inc., 16 A.3d 48"

    40 "Ace Ltd. v. Capital Re Corp., 747 A.2d 95"

    41 이철송, "2011 개정상법 축조해설" 박영사 2011

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2015-02-05 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Dankook Law Riview KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.71 0.71 0.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.56 0.53 0.68 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼