1. Word 1_ NS vs. NF 2. Word 1_ RS vs. RF 3. Word 3_NS vs. RS 4. Word1_NF vs. RF

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=G3618673
-
-
Korean
전제실패 ; null ; 배경 ; null ; 전경 ; null ; 전제 ; null ; 단언 ; null ; 주제 ; null ; 초점 ; null ; 다중초점 ; null ; 복합초점 ; null ; 통제문장 ; null ; 반구우세성 ; null ; E-Prime ; null ; EOG ; null ; 신호구간 필터링 ; null ; N400효과 ; null ; 정보 구조 ; null ; P600 효과 ; null ; 신경생리학 ; null ; 문장자극 ; null ; 뇌신경반응 ; null ; Brain Products Vision Recorder 32 채널 ; null ; 정상어순 ; null ; 도치어순 ; null ; AL(anterior left) ; null ; AM(anterior medial) ; null ; AR(anterior right) ; null ; PL(posterior left) ; null ; PM(posterior medial) ; null ; PR(posterior right) ; null ; CM(central medial) ; null ; presupposition failure ; null ; background ; null ; foreground ; null ; presupposition ; null ; assertion ; null ; topic ; null ; focus ; null ; multiple focus ; null ; complex focus ; null ; control sentences ; null ; hemispheric dominance ; null ; Psychology Software Tools ; null ; electrooculogram ; null ; band-pass filtering ; null ; Intervention Effect ; null ; ERP ; null ; grammaticality amelioration ; null ; focus particle only
한국연구재단(NRF)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
1. Word 1_ NS vs. NF 2. Word 1_ RS vs. RF 3. Word 3_NS vs. RS 4. Word1_NF vs. RF
1. Word 1_ NS vs. NF
2. Word 1_ RS vs. RF
3. Word 3_NS vs. RS
4. Word1_NF vs. RF
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
It is generally known that the grammaticality judgements vary among the native speakers of Korean concerning the so-called Intervention Effect constructions in the language, where a focused element, say NP-man (only-NP), intervenes between the wh-phra...
It is generally known that the grammaticality judgements vary among the native speakers of Korean concerning the so-called Intervention Effect constructions in the language, where a focused element, say NP-man (only-NP), intervenes between the wh-phrase and its licensing Q. Also, if the wh-phrase is fronted over the intervening focus element via scrambling, the grammaticality is improved. In this study, the reason for this variability of the grammaticality judgments about this type of construction and its scrambled counterpart is explored from a neurophysiological perspective by conducting an EEG experiment, which provides detailed information about sentence comprehension processes by being reflected in both the time-course and the scalp distribution of brain activity. In the experiment the subjects are instructed to answer wh-questions that are regarded to show the Intervention Effect in two different contexts; one where the only-phrase is presupposed and the other where it is not. The ERP data collected from the brain waves of the subjects performing this activity lead to two significant conclusions. One is that a larger amplitude of N400 component is measured in the normal order when the proper presuppositional information is not provided, which suggests that the intervention is strongly related with the ill-formed information structure due to the presupposition failure and thus shows a semantic/pragmatic nature. The other conclusion is that the grammaticality of a scrambled version with the reversed order is not affected by the presence/absence of the relevant presupposition, which seems to indicate that the proper presupposition has been inherently satisfied by the information structure suggested by the surface structure formed via scrambling. This implies that the information structure that reflects the discourse context of an utterance plays a significant role in judging its grammaticality.