RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      Prognostic Tools for Early Mortality in Hemorrhagic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101598535

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background and Purpose Several risk scores have been developed to predict mortality in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We aimed to systematically determine the performance of published prognostic tools.
      Methods We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for prognostic models (published between 2004 and April 2014) used in predicting early mortality (<6 months) afer ICH. We evaluated the discrimination performance of the tools through a random-efects meta-analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) or c-statistic. We evaluated the following components of the study validity: study design, collection of prognostic variables, treatment pathways, and missing data.
      Results We identifed 11 articles (involving 41,555 patients) reporting on the accuracy of 12 diferent tools for predicting mortality in ICH. Most studies were either retrospective or posthoc analyses of prospectively collected data; all but one produced validation data. Te Hemphill-ICH score had the largest number of validation cohorts (9 studies involving 3,819 patients) within our systematic review and showed good performance in 4 countries, with a pooled AUC of 0.80 [95% confdence interval (CI)=0.77–0.85]. We identifed several modifed versions of the Hemphill-ICH score, with the ICH-Grading Scale (GS) score appearing to be the most promising variant, with a pooled AUC across four studies of 0.87 (95% CI=0.84– 0.90). Subgroup testing found statistically signifcant diferences between the AUCs obtained in studies involving Hemphill-ICH and ICH-GS scores (p=0.01).
      Conclusions Our meta-analysis evaluated the performance of 12 ICH prognostic tools and found greater supporting evidence for 2 models (Hemphill-ICH and ICH-GS), with generally good performance overall.
      번역하기

      Background and Purpose Several risk scores have been developed to predict mortality in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We aimed to systematically determine the performance of published prognostic tools. Methods We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for progn...

      Background and Purpose Several risk scores have been developed to predict mortality in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We aimed to systematically determine the performance of published prognostic tools.
      Methods We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for prognostic models (published between 2004 and April 2014) used in predicting early mortality (<6 months) afer ICH. We evaluated the discrimination performance of the tools through a random-efects meta-analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) or c-statistic. We evaluated the following components of the study validity: study design, collection of prognostic variables, treatment pathways, and missing data.
      Results We identifed 11 articles (involving 41,555 patients) reporting on the accuracy of 12 diferent tools for predicting mortality in ICH. Most studies were either retrospective or posthoc analyses of prospectively collected data; all but one produced validation data. Te Hemphill-ICH score had the largest number of validation cohorts (9 studies involving 3,819 patients) within our systematic review and showed good performance in 4 countries, with a pooled AUC of 0.80 [95% confdence interval (CI)=0.77–0.85]. We identifed several modifed versions of the Hemphill-ICH score, with the ICH-Grading Scale (GS) score appearing to be the most promising variant, with a pooled AUC across four studies of 0.87 (95% CI=0.84– 0.90). Subgroup testing found statistically signifcant diferences between the AUCs obtained in studies involving Hemphill-ICH and ICH-GS scores (p=0.01).
      Conclusions Our meta-analysis evaluated the performance of 12 ICH prognostic tools and found greater supporting evidence for 2 models (Hemphill-ICH and ICH-GS), with generally good performance overall.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Garrett JS, "Validation of clinical prediction scores in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage" 19 : 329-335, 2013

      2 Hanley JA, "The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve" 143 : 29-36, 1982

      3 Hemphill JC 3rd, "The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage" 32 : 891-897, 2001

      4 Counsell C, "Systematic review of prognostic models in patients with acute stroke" 12 : 159-170, 2001

      5 Chuang YC, "Risk stratification for predicting 30-day mortality of intracerebral hemorrhage" 21 : 441-447, 2009

      6 Takahashi O, "Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: a Classification and Regression Tree analysis" 99 : 743-750, 2006

      7 Bushnell CD, "Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity: comparison of the NIH Stroke Scale and the Canadian Neurological Scale" 32 : 656-660, 2001

      8 Peng SY, "Random forest can predict 30-day mortality of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage with remarkable discrimination" 17 : 945-950, 2010

      9 Romano LM, "Predicting mortality and externally validation of the original intracerebral haemorrhage score after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage" 32 : 94-99, 2007

      10 Matchett SC, "Predicting mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage: comparison of scoring systems and influence of withdrawal of care" 15 : 144-150, 2006

      1 Garrett JS, "Validation of clinical prediction scores in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage" 19 : 329-335, 2013

      2 Hanley JA, "The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve" 143 : 29-36, 1982

      3 Hemphill JC 3rd, "The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage" 32 : 891-897, 2001

      4 Counsell C, "Systematic review of prognostic models in patients with acute stroke" 12 : 159-170, 2001

      5 Chuang YC, "Risk stratification for predicting 30-day mortality of intracerebral hemorrhage" 21 : 441-447, 2009

      6 Takahashi O, "Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: a Classification and Regression Tree analysis" 99 : 743-750, 2006

      7 Bushnell CD, "Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity: comparison of the NIH Stroke Scale and the Canadian Neurological Scale" 32 : 656-660, 2001

      8 Peng SY, "Random forest can predict 30-day mortality of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage with remarkable discrimination" 17 : 945-950, 2010

      9 Romano LM, "Predicting mortality and externally validation of the original intracerebral haemorrhage score after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage" 32 : 94-99, 2007

      10 Matchett SC, "Predicting mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage: comparison of scoring systems and influence of withdrawal of care" 15 : 144-150, 2006

      11 Agarwal D, "P-152. Prognostic accuracy of the iCh score on initial evaluation of patients presenting with non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage; a systematic review and meta-analysis" 37 (37): S83-S84, 2010

      12 Austin PC, "Interpreting the concordance statistic of a logistic regression model: relation to the variance and odds ratio of a continuous explanatory variable" 12 : 82-, 2012

      13 Thrift AG, "Incidence of the major stroke subtypes: initial findings from the North East Melbourne stroke incidence study (NEMESIS)" 32 : 1732-1738, 2001

      14 Clarke JL, "Hemphill JC 3rd. External validation of the ICH score" 1 : 53-60, 2004

      15 Vellutino FR, "Handbook of response to intervention: the science and practice of assessment and intervention" Springer 194-, 2007

      16 Ruiz-Sandoval JL, "Grading scale for prediction of outcome in primary intracerebral hemorrhages" 38 : 1641-1644, 2007

      17 Krishnamurthi RV, "Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010" 1 : e259-e281, 2013

      18 Perry JJ, "Emergency physicians’ management of transient ischemic attack and desired sensitivity of a clinical decision rule for stroke in three countries" 13 : 19-27, 2011

      19 Weimar C, "Development and validation of the Essen Intracerebral Haemorrhage Score" German Stroke Study Collaboration 77 : 601-605, 2006

      20 Mackay J, "Atlas of heart disease and stroke. 15 Global burden of stroke" World Health Organization

      21 Ariesen MJ, "Applicability and relevance of models that predict short term outcome after intracerebral haemorrhage" 76 : 839-844, 2005

      22 Parry-Jones AR, "Accuracy and clinical usefulness of intracerebral hemorrhage grading scores: a direct comparison in a UK population" 44 : 1840-1845, 2013

      23 Smith EE, "A risk score for in-hospital death in patients admitted with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke" 2 : e005207-, 2013

      24 Li YF, "A new simple model for prediction of hospital mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage" 18 : 482-486, 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 SCIE 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.07 0.25 1.55
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.25 1.08 0.497 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼