RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    보호책임의 국제정치: 인권, 국가주권, 유엔과 미국패권 = The International Politics of Responsibility to Protect: Human Rights, State Sovereignty, UN and American Hegemony

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104854258

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    이 글은 보호책임 개념의 고안과 명문화를 둘러싼 국제정치에 대한 검토이다. 르완다와 코소보의 비극을 배경으로 유엔 사무총장 아난은 효과적인 인도적 개입에 대한 국제사회의 합의를 촉구했고, 이를 위해 캐나다정부가 구성한 개입과 국가주권에 관한 국제위원회는 2001년 인권보호에 국가와 국제사회가 공동으로 책임이 있다는 보호책임 개념을 고안했다. 9/11 테러 이후 미국은 보호책임의 논리를 ‘도용’하여 대테러전쟁에 대한 협력을 주권의 책임으로 규정하고, 유엔 안보리의 승인 없이 이라크를 침공하였다. 아난은 안보 위협 전반에 대한 국제사회의 합의에 바탕을 둔 유엔 개혁을 통해 유엔의 적실성 위기를 타개하고자 하였고, 그 노력의 일환으로 보호책임의 명문화를 제안했다. 미국패권 대 국가주권의 대립을 축으로 하는 국제사회의 분열 속에서 2005년 유엔총회 세계정상회담은 안보 위협에 대한 합의와 유엔 개혁에 실패했고, 회담의 결과문건에 명문화된 보호책임은 효과적 인 인도적 개입은 무력화되고 대량학살, 인종청소, 전쟁범죄와 반인륜적 범죄에 국한된 것이었다.
    번역하기

    이 글은 보호책임 개념의 고안과 명문화를 둘러싼 국제정치에 대한 검토이다. 르완다와 코소보의 비극을 배경으로 유엔 사무총장 아난은 효과적인 인도적 개입에 대한 국제사회의 합의를 ...

    이 글은 보호책임 개념의 고안과 명문화를 둘러싼 국제정치에 대한 검토이다. 르완다와 코소보의 비극을 배경으로 유엔 사무총장 아난은 효과적인 인도적 개입에 대한 국제사회의 합의를 촉구했고, 이를 위해 캐나다정부가 구성한 개입과 국가주권에 관한 국제위원회는 2001년 인권보호에 국가와 국제사회가 공동으로 책임이 있다는 보호책임 개념을 고안했다. 9/11 테러 이후 미국은 보호책임의 논리를 ‘도용’하여 대테러전쟁에 대한 협력을 주권의 책임으로 규정하고, 유엔 안보리의 승인 없이 이라크를 침공하였다. 아난은 안보 위협 전반에 대한 국제사회의 합의에 바탕을 둔 유엔 개혁을 통해 유엔의 적실성 위기를 타개하고자 하였고, 그 노력의 일환으로 보호책임의 명문화를 제안했다. 미국패권 대 국가주권의 대립을 축으로 하는 국제사회의 분열 속에서 2005년 유엔총회 세계정상회담은 안보 위협에 대한 합의와 유엔 개혁에 실패했고, 회담의 결과문건에 명문화된 보호책임은 효과적 인 인도적 개입은 무력화되고 대량학살, 인종청소, 전쟁범죄와 반인륜적 범죄에 국한된 것이었다.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    R2P (Responsibility to Protect) is a concept to condition state sovereignty upon state's protection of human rights. This article traces how the agencies of UN, the United States, and international humanitarian researchers/activists have struggled and cooperated with each other in the inventing and codifying of R2P.
    Intervention in civil wars became UN's post-Cold War “growth industry” of new
    peace operations. In the wake of the humanitarian crises of Rwanda and Kosovo, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan called for the international society's consensus on effective humanitarian intervention to be administered by UN. Responding to Annan's call and aligned with international humanitarian NGOs, Canada organized the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty whose December 2001 report invented R2P in order to overcome the hitherto confrontations between non-intervention and right to intervene.
    R2P as an effective humanitarian intervention was stillborn by 9/11. The United
    States abused R2P by imposing the world the responsibility to cooperate with its war on terror. It also invaded Iraq without UN Security Council's endorsement. Annan tried to recoup UN by forging international consensus on both all the security threats― hard and soft ― and UN reform measures including expanded Security Council and codified commitment to R2P. The divisions of international society, of which main fault line was between American hegemony and state sovereignty of the rest, forestalled international consensus on security threats and UN reform. Confined to genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and deprived of
    effective intervention measures, R2P was codified in the Outcome Document of
    UN's 2005 World Summit.
    번역하기

    R2P (Responsibility to Protect) is a concept to condition state sovereignty upon state's protection of human rights. This article traces how the agencies of UN, the United States, and international humanitarian researchers/activists have struggled and...

    R2P (Responsibility to Protect) is a concept to condition state sovereignty upon state's protection of human rights. This article traces how the agencies of UN, the United States, and international humanitarian researchers/activists have struggled and cooperated with each other in the inventing and codifying of R2P.
    Intervention in civil wars became UN's post-Cold War “growth industry” of new
    peace operations. In the wake of the humanitarian crises of Rwanda and Kosovo, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan called for the international society's consensus on effective humanitarian intervention to be administered by UN. Responding to Annan's call and aligned with international humanitarian NGOs, Canada organized the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty whose December 2001 report invented R2P in order to overcome the hitherto confrontations between non-intervention and right to intervene.
    R2P as an effective humanitarian intervention was stillborn by 9/11. The United
    States abused R2P by imposing the world the responsibility to cooperate with its war on terror. It also invaded Iraq without UN Security Council's endorsement. Annan tried to recoup UN by forging international consensus on both all the security threats― hard and soft ― and UN reform measures including expanded Security Council and codified commitment to R2P. The divisions of international society, of which main fault line was between American hegemony and state sovereignty of the rest, forestalled international consensus on security threats and UN reform. Confined to genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and deprived of
    effective intervention measures, R2P was codified in the Outcome Document of
    UN's 2005 World Summit.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정은숙, "제2세대 유엔 PKO: 특징, 현황, 정치" 4 (4): 213-250, 2008

    2 이혜정, "변환외교의 논리: 또는 미국적 현실주의의 변명" 한국정치외교사학회 31 (31): 265-298, 2009

    3 이혜정, "민주평화론의 패러독스: 칸트 평화사상의 왜곡과 오용" 한국정치외교사학회 29 (29): 129-154, 2008

    4 전재성, "미-이라크전의 전후 처리 과정 분석: 반테러 전쟁과 민주정권 수립을 위한 개입적 패권 사업" 세종연구소 9 (9): 5-29, 2003

    5 Bellamy,Alex J, "Wither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and the 2005 World Summit" 20 (20): 143-169, 2006

    6 Evans,Gareth, "When is it Right to Fight?" 46 (46): 59-82, 2004

    7 Annan,Kofi, "We, the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the Twenty-First Century" 2000

    8 Heinbecker,Paul, "Washington's Exceptionalism and the United Nations" 10 : 273-279, 2004

    9 Ruggie,John Gerald, "Wandering in the Void: Charting the U.N.'s New Strategic Role" 72 (72): 26-31, 1993

    10 Evans, Gareth, "Uneasy Bedfellows: ‘The Responsibility to Protect’ and Feinstein-Slaughter's ‘Duty to Prevent’"

    1 정은숙, "제2세대 유엔 PKO: 특징, 현황, 정치" 4 (4): 213-250, 2008

    2 이혜정, "변환외교의 논리: 또는 미국적 현실주의의 변명" 한국정치외교사학회 31 (31): 265-298, 2009

    3 이혜정, "민주평화론의 패러독스: 칸트 평화사상의 왜곡과 오용" 한국정치외교사학회 29 (29): 129-154, 2008

    4 전재성, "미-이라크전의 전후 처리 과정 분석: 반테러 전쟁과 민주정권 수립을 위한 개입적 패권 사업" 세종연구소 9 (9): 5-29, 2003

    5 Bellamy,Alex J, "Wither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and the 2005 World Summit" 20 (20): 143-169, 2006

    6 Evans,Gareth, "When is it Right to Fight?" 46 (46): 59-82, 2004

    7 Annan,Kofi, "We, the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the Twenty-First Century" 2000

    8 Heinbecker,Paul, "Washington's Exceptionalism and the United Nations" 10 : 273-279, 2004

    9 Ruggie,John Gerald, "Wandering in the Void: Charting the U.N.'s New Strategic Role" 72 (72): 26-31, 1993

    10 Evans, Gareth, "Uneasy Bedfellows: ‘The Responsibility to Protect’ and Feinstein-Slaughter's ‘Duty to Prevent’"

    11 Feinstein, Lee, "UN-Divided" 82 : 82-86, 2006

    12 김열수, "UN 평화유지 활동의 부침: 구조적 원인과 행태적 원인" 39 (39): 435-454, 1999

    13 Stedman,Stephen John, "UN Transformation in an era of soft balancing" 83 (83): 933-944, 2007

    14 Walt,Stephen M, "Two Cheers for Clinton's Foreign Policy" 79 (79): 63-79, 2000

    15 Booth,Ken, "Theory of World Security" Cambridge University Press 2007

    16 Thakur, Ramesh, "The United Nations, Peace and Security: From Collective Security to the Responsibility to Protect" Cambridge University 2006

    17 Berdal,Mats, "The UN's Unnecessary Crisis" 47 (47): 7-31, 2005

    18 Carr, E. H, "The Twenty Years' Crisis" Macmillan 1939

    19 Weiss,Thomas G, "The Sunset of Humanitarian Intervention? The Responsibility Protect in a Unipolar Era" 35 (35): 135-153, 2004

    20 Gong,Gerrit W, "The Standard of 'Civilization' in International Society" Clarendon Press 1984

    21 Annan,Kofi, "The Secretary-General Address to the General Assembly"

    22 The International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, "The Responsibility to Protect: Supplementary Volume"

    23 Evans,Gareth, "The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and Far All. Washington" Brookings Institution Press 2008

    24 Focarelli,Carlo, "The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine and Humanitarian Intervention: Too Many Ambiguities for a Working Doctrine" 13 (13): 191-213, 2008

    25 Evans, Gareth, "The Responsibility to Protect" 81 (81): 99-110, 2002

    26 The International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, "The Responsibility to Protect" International Development Research Centre 2001

    27 UN Panel on Peace Operations, "The Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations" UN 2000

    28 Malaby,Sebastian, "The Reluctant Imperialist: Terrorism, Failed States and the Case for American Empire" 81 (81): 2-7, 2002

    29 Annan,Kofi, "The Question of Intervention"

    30 Chandler,David, "The Problems of 'Nation-Building': Imposing Bureaucratic Rule From Above" 17 (17): 577-91, 2004

    31 Roberts,Adam, "The Price of Protection" 44 (44): 157-161, 2002

    32 Barnett,Michael, "The New United Nations Politics of Peace: From Juridical Sovereignty to Empirical Sovereignty" 1 (1): 79-97, 1995

    33 Spiro,Peter F, "The New Sovereigntists: American Exceptionalism and Its False Prophets" 79 (79): 9-15, 2000

    34 Rotberg, "The New Nature of Nation-State Failure" 25 (25): 85-96, 2002

    35 The White House, "The National Security Strategy of the United States of America"

    36 Deng,Francis M, "The International Challenge of State Failure and Internal Displacement.In A Dialogue of the Deaf:Essays on Africa and the United Naitons" Jacana Media 2006

    37 Sachs,Jeffrey D, "The Development Challenge" 84 (84): 78-90, 2005

    38 Krasner, Stephen D, "The Danger of Failed States" 84 (84): 153-163, 2005

    39 Soderberg,Nancy, "The Crisis of Global Trust and the Failure of the (2005) World Summit" 20 (20): 235-240, 2005

    40 Traub,James, "The Best Intentions:Kofi Annan and the UN in the Era of American World Power" Picador 2007

    41 Perle,Richard, "Thank God for the Death of the UN. March 21"

    42 Bolton,John, "Surrender Is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Naitons" Threshold 2007

    43 Krasner,Stephen D, "Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy" Princeton University Press 1999

    44 Haass, Richard, "Sovereignty: Existing Rights, Evolving Responsibilities. Jan 14. http://www.iwar.org.uk/news-archive/2003/01-15.htm(검색일: 2009년 12월 21일)"

    45 Luck,Edward C, "Sovereignty, Choice and the Responsibility to Protect" 1 (1): 10-21, 2009

    46 Deng, Francis M., "Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa" Brookings Institute Press 1996

    47 Bellamy,Alex J, "Responsibility to Protect: The Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities" Polity 2009

    48 Stahn,Carsten, "Responsibility to Protect: Political Rhetoric or Emerging Legal Norm?" 101 (101): 99-120, 2007

    49 Thakur, Ramesh, "R2P: From Idea to Norm - and Action?" 1 (1): 22-53, 2009

    50 Jackson,Robert H, "Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World" Cambridge University Press 1990

    51 Rice,Condoleezza, "Promoting the National Interest" 79 (79): 45-62, 2000

    52 Cooper,Andrew F., "Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers After the Cold War" Palgrave 1997

    53 Fearon, James D, "Neotrusteeship and the Problem of Weak States" 28 (28): 5-43, 2004

    54 Axworthy,Lloyd, "Navigating a New World: Canada's Global Future" Knoft 2003

    55 Luck,Edward C.1999.Mixed Messages:American Politics and International Organization 1919-, "Mixed Messages: American Politics and International Organization 1919-1999" Brookings Institution Press 1999

    56 Cohen, Robert, "Masses in Flight: The Global Crisis of Internal Displacement" Brookings Institute 1998

    57 Doyle, Michael W, "Making War and Building Peace:United Nations Peace Operations" Princeton University Press 2006

    58 Crawford,Neta C, "Just War Theory and the U.S. Counterterror War" 1 (1): 5-25, 2003

    59 Clark,David, "Iraq Has Wrecked Out Case for Humanitarian Wars"

    60 Roberts,Adam, "Intervention: One Step Forward in the Search of the Impossible" 7 (7): 142-153, 2003

    61 Evans, Gareth, "Intervention and State Sovereignty: Breaking New Ground" 7 : 119-125, 2001

    62 Thakur, Ramesh, "International Commissions and the Power of Ideas" United Nations University Press 2005

    63 Annan, Kofi, "In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights" UN 2005

    64 Annan,Kofi, "In Larger Freedom: Decision Time at the UN" 84 (84): 63-74, 2005

    65 Thakur,Ramesh, "In Defense of the Responsibility to Protect" 7 (7): 160-178, 2003

    66 Ban,Ki-Moon, "Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: Report of the Secretary-General" UN 2009

    67 Ayoob,Mohammed, "Humanitarian Intervention and State Sovereignty" 6 (6): 81-102, 2002

    68 MacFarlane, S. Neil, "Human Security and the UN: A Critical History" Indiana University Press 2006

    69 McRae, Rob, "Human Security and New Diplomacy:Protecting People, Promoting Peace" McGill-Queen's University Press 2001

    70 Luck,Edward C, "How Not to Reform the United Nations" 11 (11): 407-414, 2005

    71 Deng,Francis M, "Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement" 33 (33): 484-493, 1999

    72 Deng,Francis M, "Frontiers of Sovereignty" 8 (8): 249-286, 1995

    73 Mandelbaum,Michael, "Foreign Policy as Social Work" 75 (75): 16-32, 1996

    74 Sylvester,Christine, "Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey" Cambridge University Press 2002

    75 Cooper, Andrew F., "Enhancing Global Governance: Towards a New Diplomacy?" United Nations University Press 2002

    76 Bourtros-Ghali,Boutros, "Empowering the United Nations" 71 : 89-102, 1992

    77 Deng,Francis M, "Dealing with the Displaced: A Challenge to the International Community" 1 (1): 45-57, 1995

    78 Flint, Julie, "Darfur: A New History of a Long War" Zed Books 2008

    79 Welsh,Jennifer M, "Conclusion: Humanitarian Intervention after 11 September. In Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations" Oxford University Press 2004

    80 Crossette,Barbara, "Canada Tries to Define Line Between Human and National Rights"

    81 Brown,Mark Malloch, "Can the UN Be Reformed?" 14 (14): 1-12, 2008

    82 Lyons, Gene M, "Beyond Westphalia?" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1995

    83 Krasner,Stephen D, "Autobiographical Reflections on the Policy-Academy Divide" 22 (22): 111-116, 2009

    84 Paris,Roland, "At War's End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict" Cambridge University Press 2004

    85 Haass, Richard, "Armed Intervention: When Nations Forfeit Their Sovereign Privileges. February 7"

    86 Bourtros-Ghali, Boutros, "An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy,Peacemaking and Peace-Keeping"

    87 Task Force on UN, "American Interests and UN Reform"

    88 Ban, Ki-Moon, "Address to Berlin Event on ‘Responsible Sovereignty" UN 1701

    89 Wheeler,Nicholas J, "A Victory for Common Humanity? The Responsibility to Protect after the (2005) World Summit" 2 (2): 95-105, 2005

    90 Allen, Tim, "A Right to Interfere? Bernard Kouchner and the New Humanitarianism" 12 (12): 825-842, 2000

    91 Patrick,Stewart, "A Return to Realism? The United States and Global Peace Operations since 9/11" 15 (15): 133-148, 2008

    92 UN High Level Panel on Threats,Challenges and Change, "A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility" UN 2004

    93 Feinstein, Lee, "A Duty to Prevent" 83 (83): 136-150, 2004

    94 이유진, "9/11 테러 이후 미국의 대외정책과 미-유엔 관계 변화" 9 : 39-62, 2004

    95 UN General Assembly, "2005 World Summit Outcome" UN 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.5 0.5 0.39
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.4 0.37 0.67 0.08
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼