RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Heuristic Search Strategies for Solving Combinatorial Optimization Problems

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2027005

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In combinatorial optimization problems, there is a discrete set of alternative solution values from which a maximum or minimum value is sought. Applications occur in many areas of computer science. as well as such diverse fields as engineering and operations research. Commonly occurring models involve routing and scheduling, allocation, assignments of tasks and agents, and transshipment patterns. It is typically the case that algorithms that yield a guaranteed optimal solution to a combinatorial optimization problem require CPU time that is an exponential function of a problem size measure. Thus, at least for problems of realistic size, it is common to apply an algorithms that runs in polynomial time and yields a solution which is not guaranteed to be optimal, but yields acceptable results. Such algorithms are known as heuristic search algorithms or approximation algorithms
      In recent years, artificial intelligent methods such as neural network, genetic algorithms, tabu search and rule-based search have emerged as major heuristic strategies for solving combinatorial optimization problems. This paper presents overviews and establises of these methods. The methods are viewed as metastrategies, in the sense that they impart properties of intelligent control to search processes. From an artificial intelligence view, the strategies are symbolic methods that at least partially
      capture two major characteristics of human intelligence : learning and adaptation. The methods operate from a hig level of abstraction that can be applied to entire categories of problems.
      번역하기

      In combinatorial optimization problems, there is a discrete set of alternative solution values from which a maximum or minimum value is sought. Applications occur in many areas of computer science. as well as such diverse fields as engineering and ope...

      In combinatorial optimization problems, there is a discrete set of alternative solution values from which a maximum or minimum value is sought. Applications occur in many areas of computer science. as well as such diverse fields as engineering and operations research. Commonly occurring models involve routing and scheduling, allocation, assignments of tasks and agents, and transshipment patterns. It is typically the case that algorithms that yield a guaranteed optimal solution to a combinatorial optimization problem require CPU time that is an exponential function of a problem size measure. Thus, at least for problems of realistic size, it is common to apply an algorithms that runs in polynomial time and yields a solution which is not guaranteed to be optimal, but yields acceptable results. Such algorithms are known as heuristic search algorithms or approximation algorithms
      In recent years, artificial intelligent methods such as neural network, genetic algorithms, tabu search and rule-based search have emerged as major heuristic strategies for solving combinatorial optimization problems. This paper presents overviews and establises of these methods. The methods are viewed as metastrategies, in the sense that they impart properties of intelligent control to search processes. From an artificial intelligence view, the strategies are symbolic methods that at least partially
      capture two major characteristics of human intelligence : learning and adaptation. The methods operate from a hig level of abstraction that can be applied to entire categories of problems.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼