판결서의 구조와 양식에 관한 비교법적 고찰 = A Comparative Study on the Structure and Style of Judicial Opinions

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A civil procedure proceeds to a final judgment. As a general rule, judgments come into existence through addressing of judicial opinions. It is needless to say that judgments come into existence orally without written judicial opinions. But, oral judgments should be filed by law clerks in order to come into effect. So, a judicial opinion occupies an very important position in civil procedure irrespective of judgment's form.
The minimal requirements of judicial opinion is prescribed by statutes, and supplemented by practice of the courts in the Civil Law Tradition. In contrast, practice of the courts have developed almost all forms and contents of judicial opinions in the Common Law Tradition. The legal tradition and culture of a nation have filtered into the structure & style of its own judicial opinions.
In addition, judicial opinions are the documents that judges make their own thoughts and beliefs clear about cases. Judicial opinions are the ways and means that judges communicate with society. So, the structure & style of judicial opinion is a mirror of the judge's individual character and personality.
In short, a study on the structure & style of judicial opinions furnishes the method of evaluating judges' capacity as well as understanding legal tradition and culture. This article analyzes and estimates the structure & style of judicial opinions from a comparative perspective.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 판결서의 구조와 양식에 관한 일반론
• Ⅲ. 우리나라 판결서에 대한 분석
• Ⅳ. 비교법적 고찰
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박 철, "판결서 글쓰기에 관한 몇 가지 생각들" 14 : 2005

2 박시현, "판결문의 특성" 원광대 8 : 2007

3 윤정옥, "판결문의 시기별 문제 연구" 경북대 1997

4 이재홍, "우리나라와 외국의 판결서 작성방식과 그 개선과정" 46 (46): 1997

5 김광해, "우리나라 판결문의 텍스트성에 대한 연구" 8 : 2000

6 "새로운 판결서 작성방식" 사법연수원 2009

7 조규창, "비교법(상)/(하)" 소화 2005

8 "법원사" 법원행정처 1995

9 김상영, "민사판결서의 간이화, in: 21세기 민사소송법의 전망 (하촌정동윤선생화갑기념논문집)" 법문사 1999

10 이원범, "민사판결서 작성방식의 현황과 개선방향"

11 "민사재판실무" 사법연수원 2003

12 양창수, "민법입문, 제4판" 박영사 2004

13 김성진, "미국연방대법원 판결문에 대한 이해" 14 : 2003

14 안경환, "미국 연방대법원판결문에 나타난 서양고전작품" 27 (27): 1994

15 정재오, "독일의 구술변론과 판결서, in: 사법개혁과 세계의 사법제도" 사법연구지원재단 2006

16 김영철, "독ㆍ불ㆍ미ㆍ영ㆍ일의 판결문 작성방식" 1992

17 박우동, "대법원전원합의체재판에 있어서의 의견의 표시, in: 민사법과 환경법의제문제 (송헌안이준박사 화갑기념논문집)" 1986

18 박우동, "대법원ㆍ대법원판결, in: 민사판례연구(Ⅰ)" 박영사 1979

19 조규창, "논리와 직관 - 대법원민사판례를 중심으로 -" 대한변호사협회 1984

20 D. Klinck, "“Criticising the Judges”: Some Preliminary Reflections on Style" 31 : 1986

21 L. Rosenberg, "Zivilprozessrecht, 16.Aufl." C.H. Beck 2004

22 J. Mance, "The common law and Europe: differences of style or substance and do they matter?(The Holdsworth Address 2007)" Holdsworth Club 2007

23 J. Gillis Wetter, "The Styles of Appellate Judicial Opinions" Sythoff 1960

24 P. Wald, "The Rhetoric of Results and the Results of Rhetoric: Judicial Writings" 62 : 1995

25 R. Ferguson, "The Judicial Opinion as Literary Genre" 2 : 1990

26 A. Rodger, "The Form and Language of Judicial Opinion" 118 : 2002

27 R. Dworkin, "Taking Rights Seriously" Harvard UP 1977

28 R. Leflar, "Some Observations concerning Judicial Opinions" 61 : 1961

29 R. Mendegris, "Le commentaire d'arrêt en droit privé. Méthodes et exemples, 7.éd." Dalloz 2004

30 P. Mimin, "Le Style des Jugements, 4e éd." Libraries techniques 1962

31 R. Posner, "Law and Literature" Harvard UP 1988

32 B. Markesinis, "Judicial Style and Judicial Reasoning in England and Germany" 59 : 2000

33 L. Ray, "Judicial Personality: Rhetoric and Emotion in Supreme Court Opinions" 59 : 2002

34 J. George, "Judicial Opinion Writing Handbook, 5th ed." Hein 2007

35 R. Posner, "Judge’s Writing Styles(And Do They Matter?)" 62 : 1995

36 D. MacCormick, "Interpreting Statutes" Ashgate 1991

37 D. MacCormick, "Interpreting Precedents" Ashgate 1997

38 W. Domnarski, "In the Opinion of the Court" University of Illinois Press 1996

39 V. Palmer, "From Embrace to Banishment: A Study of Judicial Equity in France" 47 : 1999

40 M. Wells, "French and American Judicial Opinions" 19 : 1994

41 P.S. Atiyah, "Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law" Clarendon 1987

42 W. Popkin, "Evolution of the Judicial Opinion: Institutional and Individual Styles" NYU Press 2007

43 C. Jungman, "Ein neuer “horror pleni” in den Zivilsenaten des Bundesgerichtshofs?" 64 : 2009

44 J. Dawson, "Dawson,The Oracles of the Law" University of Michigan Press 1968

45 R. Martin, "Criticising the Judges" 28 : 1982

46 B. Rudden, "Courts and Codes in England, France and Soviet Russia" 48 : 1974

47 F. Lawson, "Comparative Judicial Style" 25 : 1977

48 J. L. Goutal, "Characteristics of Judicial Style in France, Bratain and the U.S.A." 24 : 1976

49 P. Sattelmacher, "Bericht, Gutachten und Urteil, 34 Aufl." F. Vahlen 2008

50 P. Wald, "A Reply to Judge Posner" 62 : 1995

51 B. Markesinis, "A Matter of Style" 110 : 1994