RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Flexible strategy adaptation of multiple supply- demand side management with integrated energy system sizing and distribution network

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16960485

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Flexible strategy adaptation of multiple supply-demand side management with integrated energy system sizing and distribution network. By Nguyen Hoang Hai Tra Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering Graduate School of Kyung Hee University Advised by Prof. ChangKyoo Yoo The boundless energy revolution is gradually maturing with the endless efforts of driving sustainable development goals, insights attaining the strategical solution in energy system management (ESM) for human civilization and sustainability. To satisfy long-term energy sustainability, mitigating the distance between supply and demand in power generation is not terminated at activated propaganda but by trying various collaborative stakeholders to maximize sociotechnical and socioeconomic profits by national and global standards. On the other hand, global energy-related CO2 emission obtains the attention of relevant environmental protection, thus encouraging cleaner technologies as the net-negative emission instruments. Among all participating countries, whether opt-out of the reliance on energy sources with negative environmental impact is an initiative whilst ensuring sufficient supply to consistently develop either a domestic or global beneficial energy-sharing strategy is a challenge. Despite significant achievements, several inquiries could commence investigating to date: ▪ Whether the integrated energy system sizing design underscored the multi-perspective metric of socio-techno-economic-environmental and reliable criteria decision-making is restricted. ▪ Whether tailoring supply-demand response in operating the deep- wide energy distribution network (EDN) satisfies the complexion of social desires with cost-effectiveness. ▪ Whether the ultimate objective of energy sustainability is marked by endless efforts to expand the integration of renewables. ▪ Whether strategic energy policymaking is sufficient toward multiple aspects consideration of spatial and temporal features to adapt to climate change at each local area. Underscoring the points of endeavors and inadequacies in the path of valuable energy effectiveness, this study aims to nominate a roadmap of flexible energy system design, operational management, and effective strategical policymaking, all while striving for high self-sustainable flexibility (SSF) and net-negative emission (N-NE) targets. The comprehensive flow map of economic energy-effectiveness maturity from local to national standard is investigated by solving (1) the optimal design of standalone hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) sizing enhancement while considering multiple socio-techno-econo- environmental and reliable aspects, (2) the multi-response operation of EDN with novel demand-response management and conservation strategy deployment, (3) the SSF conceptualization toward N-NE technology applicability for intending maximal resources recovery, (4) the adaptive risk of climate change insights the deep decentralization network for long-term energy system resilience and (5) the global assessment of energy policy effectiveness in surmounting shortcoming points. The introduction and literature review were introduced in the first chapter of the thesis which recapitulates the intention background of main points in detail with motivative deployment for this research. Following, Chapter 3 leads an integrated design of HRES sizing which targets minimizing the outsources by organizing the energy from the storage system in long-term advance. The various sizing of reasonable stand-alone RES systems was demonstrated by using extended Power Pinch Analysis (EPoPA) with planning integrated storage system to deploy a year manageable operation progress in case of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) demand, Vietnam. Alongside Chapter 4, the multi-criteria decision-making based on the techno-socio-econo- environmental and reliability metric is constructed to tailor the decisive HRES sizing with the maximum benefits for finance and society. Initiating integrative schemes of feasible HRES sizing with high techno- socio-econo-environmental and reliability advancement attempts to construct several potential energy operation and management cornerstones in saving and useable energy reasonability, satisfying the unmet demand. This was translated into an integrated qualitative- quantitative assessment, comprising the significant alternatives that accelerated the algorithm's accuracy. Chapter 5 provides an optimal energy system operation of combined energy source generation for multiple demand responses. By integrating optimal scheduling and strategic energy decentralization, our dependable distribution network enhances energy efficiency. Our study introduces a comprehensive bidirectional network with optimal scheduling-based demand-side management (DSM), promoting superior power sharing and overall performance. The DSM ensures equitable power distribution among diverse energy sources, offering a sub-level residential demand response program. In various scenarios, the DSM-based network achieves optimal and balanced power load distribution for residential needs. Moreover, adopting self-generated renewable energy sources (RES) helps address power distribution imbalances. Energy deficits and surpluses are managed through user-installed photovoltaic panels as part of a conservation strategy. CO2 emission was also estimated to assess the environmental impact across different energy source categories. Considering appliance energy consumption satisfaction analysis, EDN efficiently reduces end-user costs, maintains a clean energy profile, and maximizes cost benefits. In chapter 6, a strategic platform for sustainable distribution networks is proposed with minimal energy waste and negative net emissions. Our approach includes multi-stage programming for efficient energy performance, flexible demand response, and equitable sharing of mixed- energy sources to optimize storage and generation. Sustainable transaction governance is prioritized to prevent deficits, supply overload, and excessive CO2 emissions. DSM-based scheduling with bidirectional regulation led to an efficient distribution network with a high economic energy rate and CO2 emission-related energy burden of 0.05 and 0.1, respectively. This approach achieved flexible emission-to-energy generation, recycling, and reliable distribution with an ESM, all rated at 0.05. User satisfaction was also high at 0.7. A promising path is offered to bridge the gap in net emission reduction goals, credit trading, and innovative greenhouse gas mitigation by leveraging CO2 emission
      번역하기

      Flexible strategy adaptation of multiple supply-demand side management with integrated energy system sizing and distribution network. By Nguyen Hoang Hai Tra Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering Graduate School of Kyung Hee University Advised by Prof. ...

      Flexible strategy adaptation of multiple supply-demand side management with integrated energy system sizing and distribution network. By Nguyen Hoang Hai Tra Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering Graduate School of Kyung Hee University Advised by Prof. ChangKyoo Yoo The boundless energy revolution is gradually maturing with the endless efforts of driving sustainable development goals, insights attaining the strategical solution in energy system management (ESM) for human civilization and sustainability. To satisfy long-term energy sustainability, mitigating the distance between supply and demand in power generation is not terminated at activated propaganda but by trying various collaborative stakeholders to maximize sociotechnical and socioeconomic profits by national and global standards. On the other hand, global energy-related CO2 emission obtains the attention of relevant environmental protection, thus encouraging cleaner technologies as the net-negative emission instruments. Among all participating countries, whether opt-out of the reliance on energy sources with negative environmental impact is an initiative whilst ensuring sufficient supply to consistently develop either a domestic or global beneficial energy-sharing strategy is a challenge. Despite significant achievements, several inquiries could commence investigating to date: ▪ Whether the integrated energy system sizing design underscored the multi-perspective metric of socio-techno-economic-environmental and reliable criteria decision-making is restricted. ▪ Whether tailoring supply-demand response in operating the deep- wide energy distribution network (EDN) satisfies the complexion of social desires with cost-effectiveness. ▪ Whether the ultimate objective of energy sustainability is marked by endless efforts to expand the integration of renewables. ▪ Whether strategic energy policymaking is sufficient toward multiple aspects consideration of spatial and temporal features to adapt to climate change at each local area. Underscoring the points of endeavors and inadequacies in the path of valuable energy effectiveness, this study aims to nominate a roadmap of flexible energy system design, operational management, and effective strategical policymaking, all while striving for high self-sustainable flexibility (SSF) and net-negative emission (N-NE) targets. The comprehensive flow map of economic energy-effectiveness maturity from local to national standard is investigated by solving (1) the optimal design of standalone hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) sizing enhancement while considering multiple socio-techno-econo- environmental and reliable aspects, (2) the multi-response operation of EDN with novel demand-response management and conservation strategy deployment, (3) the SSF conceptualization toward N-NE technology applicability for intending maximal resources recovery, (4) the adaptive risk of climate change insights the deep decentralization network for long-term energy system resilience and (5) the global assessment of energy policy effectiveness in surmounting shortcoming points. The introduction and literature review were introduced in the first chapter of the thesis which recapitulates the intention background of main points in detail with motivative deployment for this research. Following, Chapter 3 leads an integrated design of HRES sizing which targets minimizing the outsources by organizing the energy from the storage system in long-term advance. The various sizing of reasonable stand-alone RES systems was demonstrated by using extended Power Pinch Analysis (EPoPA) with planning integrated storage system to deploy a year manageable operation progress in case of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) demand, Vietnam. Alongside Chapter 4, the multi-criteria decision-making based on the techno-socio-econo- environmental and reliability metric is constructed to tailor the decisive HRES sizing with the maximum benefits for finance and society. Initiating integrative schemes of feasible HRES sizing with high techno- socio-econo-environmental and reliability advancement attempts to construct several potential energy operation and management cornerstones in saving and useable energy reasonability, satisfying the unmet demand. This was translated into an integrated qualitative- quantitative assessment, comprising the significant alternatives that accelerated the algorithm's accuracy. Chapter 5 provides an optimal energy system operation of combined energy source generation for multiple demand responses. By integrating optimal scheduling and strategic energy decentralization, our dependable distribution network enhances energy efficiency. Our study introduces a comprehensive bidirectional network with optimal scheduling-based demand-side management (DSM), promoting superior power sharing and overall performance. The DSM ensures equitable power distribution among diverse energy sources, offering a sub-level residential demand response program. In various scenarios, the DSM-based network achieves optimal and balanced power load distribution for residential needs. Moreover, adopting self-generated renewable energy sources (RES) helps address power distribution imbalances. Energy deficits and surpluses are managed through user-installed photovoltaic panels as part of a conservation strategy. CO2 emission was also estimated to assess the environmental impact across different energy source categories. Considering appliance energy consumption satisfaction analysis, EDN efficiently reduces end-user costs, maintains a clean energy profile, and maximizes cost benefits. In chapter 6, a strategic platform for sustainable distribution networks is proposed with minimal energy waste and negative net emissions. Our approach includes multi-stage programming for efficient energy performance, flexible demand response, and equitable sharing of mixed- energy sources to optimize storage and generation. Sustainable transaction governance is prioritized to prevent deficits, supply overload, and excessive CO2 emissions. DSM-based scheduling with bidirectional regulation led to an efficient distribution network with a high economic energy rate and CO2 emission-related energy burden of 0.05 and 0.1, respectively. This approach achieved flexible emission-to-energy generation, recycling, and reliable distribution with an ESM, all rated at 0.05. User satisfaction was also high at 0.7. A promising path is offered to bridge the gap in net emission reduction goals, credit trading, and innovative greenhouse gas mitigation by leveraging CO2 emission

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Chapter 1. Introduction .1
      • Chapter 2. Literature review 10
      • PART I .22
      • Chapter 3. Integrated configuration of sizing hybrid RESs with a battery-hydrogen storage system for dynamic demand .23
      • Chapter 4. Optimal design and management using multiple reliability and techno-economic-environmental criteria .44
      • Chapter 1. Introduction .1
      • Chapter 2. Literature review 10
      • PART I .22
      • Chapter 3. Integrated configuration of sizing hybrid RESs with a battery-hydrogen storage system for dynamic demand .23
      • Chapter 4. Optimal design and management using multiple reliability and techno-economic-environmental criteria .44
      • PART II .74
      • Chapter 5. Novel DSM scheduling-based bidirectional regulation of EDN with multiple self-produced renewables. .75
      • Chapter 6. Strategic framework for net-negative emissions through flexible energy decentralization with smart planning .113
      • Chapter 7. Sub-regional extension in expanding resilient net-negative water-energy-emission decentralization networks .154
      • PART III. 194
      • Chapter 8. Preventive planning anticipation of climate change risks adaption in multi-decentralization network .195
      • Chapter 9. Potential impacts assessment in policy management for enhancing energy efficiency and security based on ML application .235
      • Chapter 10. Conclusion 274
      • References 280
      • Curriculum Vitae . 292
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1. Global Energy Review 2021, International Energy Agency, 2020 1–36, , 2021

      2. Energy hubs for the future, Geidl, M., Koeppel, G., Castelli, A. F., Klockl, B., 5, 24–30. https://doi. org/10.1109/MPAE.2007.264850, , 2007

      3. Global Energy Outlook 2021, Geden, O., Cowie, A., Seth Villanueva, B. P., Richard Newell, Reisinger, A., Pathways from Paris, , 2021

      4. The Carbon impact of Water, Dycian, Y., 1–6, , 2020

      5. Renewables 2017WWW Document, IEA, URL https://www. iea. org/publications/renewables2017/, , 2017

      6. Hydropower Status Report 2022, IHA, 1–83, , 2022

      7. Electricity Market Report 2023, IEA, Paris, , 2023

      8. Time to rethink energy research, Shove, E., 6, 118–120. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560-020-00739-9, , 2021

      9. Electricity generation and health, Markandya, A., Wilkinson, P., Galeazzi, C., Anadon, L. D., 370, 979–990. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61253-7, , 2007

      10. Classification And Regression Trees, Breiman, L. Friedman, J. H. Olshen, R. A. Stone, C. J., https://doi. org/10.1201/9781315139470, , 2017

      1. Global Energy Review 2021, International Energy Agency, 2020 1–36, , 2021

      2. Energy hubs for the future, Geidl, M., Koeppel, G., Castelli, A. F., Klockl, B., 5, 24–30. https://doi. org/10.1109/MPAE.2007.264850, , 2007

      3. Global Energy Outlook 2021, Geden, O., Cowie, A., Seth Villanueva, B. P., Richard Newell, Reisinger, A., Pathways from Paris, , 2021

      4. The Carbon impact of Water, Dycian, Y., 1–6, , 2020

      5. Renewables 2017WWW Document, IEA, URL https://www. iea. org/publications/renewables2017/, , 2017

      6. Hydropower Status Report 2022, IHA, 1–83, , 2022

      7. Electricity Market Report 2023, IEA, Paris, , 2023

      8. Time to rethink energy research, Shove, E., 6, 118–120. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560-020-00739-9, , 2021

      9. Electricity generation and health, Markandya, A., Wilkinson, P., Galeazzi, C., Anadon, L. D., 370, 979–990. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61253-7, , 2007

      10. Classification And Regression Trees, Breiman, L. Friedman, J. H. Olshen, R. A. Stone, C. J., https://doi. org/10.1201/9781315139470, , 2017

      11. The renaissance of energy innovation, Skea, J., 7, 21–24. https://doi. org/10.1039/C3EE43034K, , 2014

      12. Harvesting Energy from CO 2 Emissions, Paz-García, J. M., Hamelers, H. V. M., Schaetzle, O., 1, 31–35. https://doi. org/10.1021/ez4000059, , 2014

      13. Smart energy and smart energy systems, Østergaard, P. A., Javed, M. S., Lund, H., Mathiesen, B. V., Energy 137, 556–565. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2017.05.123, , 2017

      14. Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Adams, B. M., Roberts, DC, Poloczanska, ES, O., Buscheck, T. A., Bielicki, J. M., Tignor, M., Nelson, E. S., Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Pötner, H IPCC Climate. https://doi. org/10.1017/9781009325844. Front, , 2022

      15. Fire risk in MTBF evaluation for UPS system, Elia, S., Santantonio, A., Adv. Electr. Electron. Eng. 14, 189–195. https://doi. org/10.15598/aeee. v14i2.1662, , 2016

      16. Wind Energy and Role of Effecting Parameters, R. K. Tyagi, 1 3, 73–83, , 2012

      17. Summary of the Global Climate Action High-Level, Unfccc, Event at COP 26 1–16, , 2022

      18. When are negative emissions negative emissions?, Lala, H., Sawle, Y., Tanzer, S. E., 12, 1210–1218. https://doi. org/10.1039/C8EE03338B, , 2019

      19. 2022 Electricity ATB Technologies and Data Overview, NREL, WWW Document URL https://atb. nrel. gov/electricity/2022/index (accessed 11.23.23, , 2022

      20. Net Zero Energy Model for Wastewater Treatment Plants, Qandil, M. D., Abbas, A. I., Salem, A. R., Abdelhadi, A. I., Hasan, A., Nourin, F. N., Abousabae, M., Selim, O. M., Espindola, J., Amano, R. S., 143. https://doi. org/10.1115/1.4050082, , 2021

      21. World Energy Transitions Outlook 2023: 1.5°C Pathway, IRENA, 2023, Abu Dhabi, , 2023

      22. Net-zero emissions targets are vague: three ways to fix, Rogelj, J., Duveiller, E., 591, 365–368. https://doi. org/10.1038/d41586-021-00662-3, , 2021

      23. Green Growth and Developing Countries Consultation Draft, OECD, 145, , 2012

      24. Failure mode and effect analysis for photovoltaic systems, Colli, A., 50, 804–809. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. rser.2015.05.056, , 2015

      25. Fostering Effective Energy Transition 2021 insight report, WEF, W. E. F., 50, , 2021

      26. Net-Zero-Energy Model for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment, Lin, M., Kim, K. N., Tehrani, F., Yan, P., Lv, J., Moon, J.-M., Ma, J., Lin, Z., Wang, J., Yu, Q., Xu, S., 51, 1017–1023. https://doi. org/10.1021/acs. est.6b04735, , 2017

      27. Quasi-oracle estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects, Hossain, M. J., Fernandez, E., Wager, S., Nie, X., Amin, B. M. R., Biometrika 108, 299–319. https://doi. org/10.1093/biomet/asaa076, , 2021

      28. Analyzing operational flexibility of electric power systems, Kasaeian, A., Ulbig, A., Niu, X., Mahian, O., 72, 155–164. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. ijepes.2015.02.028, , 2015

      29. The importance of social relations in shaping energy demand, Hashim, H., Middlemiss, L., Hargreaves, T., 5, 195–201. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560-020-0553-5, , 2020

      30. Energy innovation funding and institutions in major economies, Banerjee, S., Meckling, J., Xu, T., Shears, E., 7, 876–885. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560-022- 01117-3, , 2022

      31. The levelized cost of electricity from perovskite photovoltaics, Montecucco, R., Larini, V., De Bastiani, M., Grancini, G., https://doi. org/10.1039/D2EE03136A, , 2023

      32. A novel SMART energy system for using biomass energy effectively, Heo, S., Nakagawa, T., Notoji, Y., Kim, J., 116, 492–499. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. renene.2017.09.049, , 2018

      33. Demand Side Management in Smart Grid Using Heuristic Optimization, Shun, T. Z., Srinivasan, D., Li, Q., Logenthiran, T., IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 3 1244–1252. https://doi. org/10.1109/TSG.2012.2195686, , 2012

      34. Dynamical cognitive network - an extension of fuzzy cognitive map, Bhattacharyya, D., Zhi-Qiang Liu, Yuan Miao, Gandhi, A., Wang, Y., Vudata, S. P., Hasan, M. M. F., IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 9, 760–770. https://doi. org/10.1109/91.963762, , 2001

      35. Modelling lifestyle effects on energy demand and related emissions, Shi, J., Weber, C., Lim, G. J., Molavi, A., Fan, L., 28, 549–566. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00040-9, , 2000

      36. A review of the state-of-the-art in wind-energy reliability analysis, Alhmoud, L., Wang, B., 81, 1643–1651. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. rser.2017.05.252, , 2018

      37. Energy and enjoyment: The value of household electricity consumption, Grunewald, P., Anable, J., in Energy and Behaviour. Elsevier, pp. 263–281. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0- 12-818567-4.00011-9, , 2020

      38. Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained energy sector planning, Ramírez, A., Tan, R. R., Energy 32, 1422–1429. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2006.09.018, , 2007

      39. A dynamic fuzzy cognitive map applied to chemical process supervision, Mendonça, M., Neves, F., 26, 1199–1210. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. engappai.2012.11.007, , 2013

      40. A quantitative assessment of energy strategy evolution in China and US, Li, J., Zhou, D., Zhang, H., 15, 886–890. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. rser.2010.09.021, , 2011

      41. Fault tree analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell system safety, Collong, S., Kouta, R., Breyer, C., 40, 8248–8260. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. ijhydene.2015.04.101, , 2015

      42. r cess Integration techniques for optimal design of hybrid power systems, anan, ., assan, K emeš, J. J., ammad a i, . E. an i, Lee, J.-W., 61, 26– 35. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. applthermaleng.2012.12.038, , 2013

      43. Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies, Evans, T. J., Evans, A., Strezov, V., Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Water4601M Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water Distribution System Issue Paper Nitrification Background and Disclaimer, 13, 1082–1088. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. rser.2008.03.008, , 2002

      44. Economic analysis of PV/diesel hybrid system with flywheel energy storage, Daniel Raimi, Ramli, M. A. M., Twaha, S., 78, 398–405. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. renene.2015.01.026, , 2015

      45. Reliability Assessment of Electric Power Systems Using Monte Carlo Methods, a ise, Billinton, R., d’ ccadia,, Li, W., icid mini, Reliability Assessment of Electric Power Systems Using Monte Carlo Methods. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1346-3, , 2013

      46. The mutual dependence of negative emission technologies and energy systems, Peters, G. P., Minx, J., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., Socolow, R., 12, 1805–1817. https://doi. org/10.1039/C8EE03682A, , 2019

      47. Big-data-driven low-carbon management in Big Data Mining for Climate Change, Wang, C., Zhang, X., Xue, M., Li, P., Zhang, Z., Wang, K., Elsevier, pp. 287–299. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818703-6.00015-5, , 2020

      48. Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation Benchmark Simulation Model, Alex, J., Benedetti, L., Copp, J., Gernaey, K. V, Jeppsson, U., Nopens, I., Pons, M., Rieger, L., Rosen, C., Steyer, J. P., Vanrolleghem, P., Winkler, S., no . 1 ( BSM1 ) 1., , 2008

      49. Microalgae as Sustainable Renewable Energy Feedstock for Biofuel Production, Angelico, B., Yusoff, F. M., Shariff, M., Arruda, L. V. R., Medipally, S. R., 1–13. https://doi. org/10.1155/2015/519513, , 2015

      50. Levelized Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2022, EIA, US Energy Inf. Adm. 1–5, , 2022

      51. Optimization and Reliability Evaluation of an Offshore Wind Farm Architecture, Biswas, A., Machmoum, M., Guerin, P., Josse, L., Rhein, P., Dahmani, O., IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 8, 542–550. https://doi. org/10.1109/TSTE.2016.2609283, , 2017

      52. bp Energy Outlook 2023 edition 2023 explores the key trends and uncertainties, Petroleum, B., 1–53, , 2023

      53. A self-sustainable wearable multi-modular E-textile bioenergy microgrid system, Chun Yan Miao, Chee Kheong Siew, Yin, L., Yu, J., 12, 1542. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-021-21701-7, , 2021

      54. An ANP-SWOT approach for ESCOs industry strategies in Chinese building sectors, Zhuang, T., Liu, G., Zheng, S., Hsu, Y.-F., Xu, P., 93, 90–99. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. rser.2018.03.090, , 2018

      55. A multi-level Demand-Side Management algorithm for offgrid multi-source systems, Mahmoudimehr, J., Roy, A., Tran, Q. T., 191, 116536. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2019.116536, , 2020

      56. National context is a key determinant of energy security concerns across Europe, Pohjolainen, P., Fisher, S., Whitmarsh, L., Aviso, K. B., Steg, L., Jokinen, P., Demski, C., Umit, R., Bandyopadhyay, S., Poortinga, W., 3, 882–888. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560-018-0235-8, , 2018

      57. Peer-to-peer electricity trading as an enabler of increased PV and EV ownership, Hutty, T. D., Rothman, R., Parra, D., Pena-Bello, A., 245, 114634. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. enconman.2021.114634, , 2021

      58. Reliability benefit of energy storage in wind integrated power system operation, Karki, R., Thapa, S., https://doi. org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0162, , 2015

      59. Smart Energy Systems for coherent 100% renewable energy and transport solutions, Mathiesen, B. V., Lund, H., Connolly, D., Wenzel, H., Østergaard, P. A., Möller, B., Nielsen, S., Ridjan, I., Karnøe, P., Sperling, K., Hvelplund, F. K., 145, 139–154. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2015.01.075, , 2015

      60. Dynamic load management in a smart home to participate in demand response events, Coakley, D., Fernandes, F., Vale, Z., Ramos, C., Morais, H., Energy Build. 82, 592–606. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. enbuild.2014.07.067, , 2014

      61. Energy Transition UN Report - Towards the achivement of SDG 7 Net-zero emissions, Nations, U. I., 157–166, , 2018

      62. The United Nations world water development report 2020 : Water and climate change, UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme, UNESCO, , 2020

      63. The impact of intelligent cyber-physical systems on the decarbonization of energy, International Renewable Energy Agency, Inderwildi, O., Kraft, M., Wang, X., Zhang, C., 13, 744–771. https://doi. org/10.1039/C9EE01919G, , 2020

      64. Author Correction: Matching consumer segments to innovative utility business models, Biesheuvel, P. M., Matthews, Y., Workman, M., Hardy, J., Hall, S., Buisman, C. J. N., Mazur, C., 6, 684–684. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560-021-00809-6, , 2021

      65. The effects of oil price volatility on ethanol, gasoline, and sugar price forecasts, Carpio, L. G. T., 181, 1012–1022. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2019.05.067, , 2019

      66. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model, Rezaei, J., Omega 64, 126–130. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. omega.2015.12.001, , 2016

      67. Design of a stand alone system with renewable energy sources using trade off methods, David, M., Gavanidou, E. S., IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. https://doi. org/10.1109/60.124540, , 1992

      68. The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy, Markard, J., 3, 628–633. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7, , 2018

      69. A multi-objective decision-making approach for sustainable energy investment planning, Delen, D., Evren, R., Cayir Ervural, B., 126, 387–402. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. renene.2018.03.051, , 2018

      70. Multi-Residential Demand Response Scheduling With Multi-Class Appliances in Smart Grid, Moon, S., Chisaka, H., 2518–2528. https://doi. org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2614546, , 2018

      71. Self-Sustainable Community of Electricity Prosumers in the Emerging Distribution System, Cai, Y., Bernal-Agustín, J. L., Huang, T., Li, Y., Cao, Y., IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 8, 2207–2216. https://doi. org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2518241, , 2017

      72. The third route: Using extreme decentralization to create resilient urban water systems, Rabaey, K., Sedlak, D. L., Hiendro, A., Vandekerckhove, T., 185, 116276. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. watres.2020.116276, , 2020

      73. Wind energy in Vietnam: Resource assessment, development status and future implications, Nguyen, K. Q., 1405–1413. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. enpol.2006.04.011, , 2007

      74. An Evaluation Toolkit to Guide Model Selection and Cohort Definition in Causal Inference, Shimoni, Y., Madlener, R., Sheykhha, S., https://doi. org/https://doi. org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.00442, , 2019

      75. Cross-Sectional Dependence and Problems in Inference in Market-Based Accounting Research, Bernard, V. L., 25, 1. https://doi. org/10.2307/2491257, , 1987

      76. A feasibility study of a stand-alone hybrid solar-wind-battery system for a remote island, Yang, H., Ma, T., https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2014.01.090, , 2014

      77. Standalone Renewable Energy and Hydrogen in an Agricultural Context: A Demonstrative Case, Carroquino, J., Dufo-López, R., Sustain. 11. https://doi. org/10.3390/su11040951, , 2019

      78. Economic evaluation of maintenance strategies for ground-mounted solar photovoltaic plants, Kim, Y., Peters, L., Kim, C., Kim, M., Kim, H., 199, 264–280. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2017.04.060, , 2017

      79. Economic feasibility of solar power plants based on PV module with levelized cost analysis, Gürtürk, M., Energy 171, 866–878. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2019.01.090, , 2019

      80. A review of energy storage technologies for demand-side management in industrial facilities, Milcarek, R. J., Villalobos, R., Phelan, P., Al-Awami, A. T., Al-Sumaiti, A. S., Elio, J., El Moursi, M. S., 307, 127322. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2021.127322, , 2021

      81. E a ua ing inas i mass p er pr duc i n in es men ased n a policy benefit real options model, Wang, L., Wang, X., 73, 751–761. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2014.06.080, , 2014

      82. Potential of demand side integration to maximize use of renewable energy sources in Germany, Styczynski, Z. A., Stötzer, M., Bhatti, A. R., Mustafa, M. W., 146, 344–352. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2015.02.015, , 2015

      83. Pre-feasibility study of stand-alone hybrid energy systems for applications in Newfoundland, Khan, M. J., Iqbal, M. T., https://doi. org/10.1016/j. renene.2004.09.001, , 2005

      84. An integrated two-level demand-side management game applied to smart energy hubs with storage, Bjørn-Thygesen, F., Sorensen, K., Sobhani, S. O., Schirach, O. M., Sorensen, S., Andersen, R., Energy 206, 118017. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2020.118017, , 2020

      85. Intelligent demand side management for optimal energy scheduling of grid connected microgrids, Kumar, R. S., Raghav, L. P., Raju, D. K., Ifaei, P., Esfahani, I. J., Singh, A. R., 285, 116435. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2021.116435, , 2021

      86. Techno-economic optimization analysis of stand-alone renewable energy system for remote areas, Manzoor, M. O., Amjad, W., Munir, A., Majeed, M. A., Asghar, F., Akram, F., 38, 100673. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. seta.2020.100673, , 2020

      87. Global scenarios of household access to modern energy services under climate mitigation policy, Poblete-Cazenave, M., Moncur, J. E. T., Liu, C. C. K., van Ruijven, B., 6, 824–833. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560-021-00871-0, , 2021

      88. SAHPPA: A novel power pinch analysis approach for the design of off-grid hybrid energy systems, Khor, C. S., Brown, S., Macchietto, S., Ho, W. S., Klemes, J. J., Dong, S., Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 16, 957–970. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10098-013-0700-9, , 2014

      89. Decarbonization, population disruption and resource inventories in the global energy transition, Moradinejad, S., Svobodova, K., 13, 7674. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-022-35391-2, , 2022

      90. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. A Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, 2023, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Geneva, Switzerland, , 2023

      91. Optimum residential load management strategy for real time pricing (RTP) demand response programs, Monteiro, C., Lujano-Rojas, J. M., Connolly, D., Energy Policy 45, 671–679. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. enpol.2012.03.019, , 2012

      92. The value of CO2-Bulk energy storage with wind in transmission-constrained electric power systems, Ogland-Hand, J. D., Sioshansi, R., Ayodele, T. R., Akinola, O. A., Saar, M. O., 228, 113548. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. enconman.2020.113548, , 2021

      93. An energy management maturity model for multi-site industrial organisations with a global presence, Keane, M. M., Finnerty, N., Sterling, R., 167, 1232–1250. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2017.07.192, , 2017

      94. Techno-economic role of PV tracking technology in a hybrid PV-hydroelectric standalone power system, Dinmohammadi, F., Shabani, M., 212, 84–108. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2017.12.030, , 2018

      95. A blockchain consensus mechanism that uses Proof of Solution to optimize energy dispatch and trading, Zhang, N., Xia, Q., Mi, H., Kang, C., Yan, Z., Ping, J., Chen, S., Shen, Z., Liu, X., 7, 495–502. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560-022-01027-4, , 2022

      96. Benefits and costs of a utility-ownership business model for residential rooftop solar photovoltaics, Satchwell, A. J., Barbose, G., 5, 750–758. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560- 020-0673-y, , 2020

      97. Application of fault tree analysis for customer reliability assessment of a distribution power system, Varuttamaseni, A., Kintner-Meyer, M., Abdul Rahman, F., Lee, J. C., Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 111, 76–85. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. ress.2012.10.011, , 2013

      98. Sustainable energy technologies for the Global South: challenges and solutions toward achieving SDG 7, Taghartapeh, M. R., Soni, V., Kay Lup, A. N., Son, J., Montañés, R. M., Kindermann, H., Keenan, B., Poya, Y., Morato, M. M., Ertl, T., 2, 570–585. https://doi. org/10.1039/D2VA00247G, , 2023

      99. i mass inn a i n anadas eading c ean ec pp r uni y r greenhouse gas reduction and economic prosperity, Stephen, J., Richter, M., Hauer, I., Wood- m, ., Biomass Innov. 1–14, , 2016

      100. Market-pull policies to promote renewable energy: A quantitative assessment of tendering implementation, Bento, N., Gianfrate, G., Borello, M., 248, 119209. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.119209, , 2020

      101. The heterogeneous role of energy policies in the energy transition of Asia–Pacific emerging economies, He, P., Guan, D., Wu, Y., Meng, J., Liang, X., Coffman, D. M., Chen, P., Li, D., 7, 588–596. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560-022-01029-2, , 2022

      102. Characterizing of water-energy-emission nexus of coalfired power industry using entropy weighting method, Wang, C., Xu, M., Dai, C., Cai, Y., 161, 104991. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. resconrec.2020.104991, , 2020

      103. Reliability analysis of a wastewater treatment plant using fault tree analysis and Monte Carlo simulation, Foo, D. C. Y., Taheriyoun, M., 187. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10661-014-4186-7, , 2015

      104. Balancing safety with sustainability: assessing the risk of accidents for modern low-carbon energy systems, Vainorius, A., Sovacool, B. K., Tienda, V., 112, 3952–3965. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2015.07.059, , 2016

      105. Techno-economic design and performance analysis of nanogrid systems for households in energy-poor villages, Akinyele, D., 34, 335–357. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. scs.2017.07.004, , 2017

      106. User satisfaction-induced demand side load management in residential buildings with user budget constraint, Ogunjuyigbe, A. S. O., Ayodele, T. R., Akinola, O. A., 187, 352–366. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2016.11.071, , 2017

      107. Reliability Assessment of Battery-Assisted and Electrolyser-Battery Integrated PV Systems for off-Grid Applications Reliability Assessment of Battery-Assisted and Electrolyser- Battery Integrated PV Systems for Off-Grid Applications * Transforming primary mathematics: understanding classrooms tasks, tools and talk 1–16. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315667256, Effah, F. B., Quaicoe, J. E., M., Annan, J. K., Askew, , 2018

      108. National growth dynamics of wind and solar power compared to the growth required for global climate targets, Tosun, J., Gordon, J. A., Jewell, J., Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., 6, 742–754. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560-021-00863-0, , 2021

      109. An FMEA-based risk assessment approach for wind turbine systems: A comparative study of onshore and offshore, Funde, N., Shafiee, M., Mokhade, A., Bokde, N. D., 7, 619–642. https://doi. org/10.3390/en7020619, , 2014

      110. A Game Theory Approach to Multi-Agent Decentralized Energy Management of Autonomous Polygeneration Microgrids, Papadakis, G., Karavas, C.-S., 10, 1756. https://doi. org/10.3390/en10111756, , 2017

      111. Environmental assessment of wastewater discharges at river basin level by means of waste absorption footprint, Gavrilescu, D., Teodosiu, C., Frohlich, K., Favre-Perrod, P., Andersson, G., Sustain. Prod. Consum. 21, 33–46. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. spc.2019.10.006, , 2020

      112. From least cost to least risk: Producing climate change mitigation plans that are resilient to multiple risks, Bakirtzis, A. G., Lempert, R., Gambhir, A., Front. Clim. 5. https://doi. org/10.3389/fclim.2023.1149309, , 2023

      113. Optimal sizing, operating strategy and operational experience of a stand-alone microgrid on Dongfushan Island, Saiga Y, Zhao, B., Johnson FH, 113, 1656–1666. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2013.09.015, , 2014

      114. Review on reliability improvement and power loss reduction in distribution system via network reconfiguration, Moudrý, V., Sultana, U., Stringer, M., Sovacool, B. K., Lèbre, É., Owen, J. R., Kemp, D., Sultana, B., 66, 297–310. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. rser.2016.08.011, , 2016

      115. Life cycle assessment and economic efficiency analysis of integrated management of wastewater treatment plants, Piao, W., Byers, E., Mastrucci, A., Pachauri, S., 113, 325– 337. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2015.11.012, , 2016

      116. Optimizing a hybrid wind-PV-battery system using GA-PSO and MOPSO for reducing cost and increasing reliability, Toopshekan, A., Feizizadeh, B., Maghami, A., Ghorbani, N., Blaschke, T., Kasaeian, A., Energy 154, 581–591. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2017.12.057, , 2018

      117. A comprehensive review on optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems using various optimization techniques, Andersson, G., Thirunavukkarasu, M., 176, 113192. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. rser.2023.113192, , 2023

      118. Analyzing the impact of three-dimensional building structure on CO2 emissions based on random forest regression, Lin, J., Wang, F., Lu, S., Energy 236, 121502. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2021.121502, , 2021

      119. Coordinating the day-ahead operation scheduling for demand response and water desalination plants in smart grid, Elsir, M., 335, 120770. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2023.120770, , 2023

      120. Extended-power pinch analysis (EPoPA) for integration of renewable energy systems with battery/hydrogen storages, IRNEA, Yoo, C. K., Ji, C., Abo Keir, M. Y., Janghorban Esfahani, I., Lee, S. C., Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2021, 80, 1– 14. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. renene.2015.01.040, , 2022

      121. Optimal design and integration of decentralized electrochemical energy storage with renewables and fossil plants, Zantye, M. S., Karimi, S., Mehri-Tekmeh, J., 15, 4119–4136. https://doi. org/10.1039/D2EE00771A, , 2022

      122. Adaptive Negotiation Agent for Facilitating Bi-Directional Energy Trading Between Smart Building and Utility Grid, Wang, Z., Perrels, A., IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4, 702–710. https://doi. org/10.1109/TSG.2013.2237794, , 2013

      123. Photovoltaic/battery system sizing for rural electrification in Bolivia: Considering the suppressed demand effect, Lindbergh, G., Lundblad, A., Benavente, F., Cabrera, S., Zhang, Y., Campana, P. E., 235, 519–528. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2018.10.084, , 2019

      124. Economic Analysis of Renewable Energy in the Electricity Marketization Framework: A Case Study in Guangdong, China, Wu, Y., Liu, W., Zhang, X., Front. Energy Res. 8. https://doi. org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00098, , 2020

      125. Reliability, economic and environmental analysis of a microgrid system in the presence of renewable energy resources, Bansal, R. C., Adefarati, T., 236, 1089–1114. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2018.12.050, , 2019

      126. A sustainable rural electrification based on a socio-techno-economic-environmentalpolitical microgrid design framework, Kumar, P., Singh, A. R., Rayudu, R., Sah, B., Kumar, A., 15, 4213–4246. https://doi. org/10.1039/D2EE01175A, , 2022

      127. Unified pinch approach for targeting of carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems with multiple time periods and regions, Bernal-Agustín, J. L., Tan, R. R., Domínguez-Navarro, J. A., Aso, I., Foo, D. C. Y., Diamante, J. A. R., Ng, D. K. S., 71, 67–74. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2013.11.027, , 2014

      128. Multi- Criteria Decision Analysis for user satisfaction-induced demand-side load management for an institutional building, Gangaram Sundar, G., Elavarasan, R. M., Vishnupriyan, J., Leoponraj, S., 170, 1396–1426. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. renene.2021.01.134, , 2021

      129. A SWOT framework for analyzing the electricity supply chain using an integrated AHP methodology combined with fuzzy-TOPSIS, Zare, K., Cao, J., 3, 66–80. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. ism.2015.07.001, , 2015

      130. Fair P2P energy trading between residential and commercial multi-energy systems enabling integrated demand-side management, Jing, R., Xie, M. N., Arvanitis, K., Wang, F. X., 262, 114551. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2020.114551, , 2020

      131. Increasing solar entitlement and decreasing energy vulnerability in a low-income community by adopting the Prosuming Project, Fox, N., 8, 74–83. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560-022-01169-5, , 2023

      132. Iterative sizing of solar-assisted mixed district heating network and local electrical grid integrating demand-side management, Diakonova, M., Ramousse, J., Gronier, T., 238, 121517. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2021.121517, , 2022

      133. Optimization-based identification and quantification of demand-side management potential for distributed energy supply systems, Bardow, A., Lampe, M., Bahl, B., Voll, P., Energy 135, 889– 899. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2017.06.083, , 2017

      134. Quantitative assessment of energy conservation and renewable energy awareness among variant urban communities of Xiamen, China, Ali, G., Xu, S., Xu, L., Cui, S., Yan, N., Hussain, J., Huang, Y., 109, 230–238. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. rser.2019.04.028, , 2019

      135. The levelized cost of negative CO2 emissions from thermochemical conversion of biomass coupled with carbon capture and storage, Small, A. A., Colosi, L. M., Cheng, F., 237, 114115. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. enconman.2021.114115, , 2021

      136. An Overview of Demand Response in Smart Grid and Optimization Techniques for Efficient Residential Appliance Scheduling Problem, Meade, D., Karavani, E., Alford, S. H., Ravid, S., Ng, T. H., Bak, P., Goldschmidt, Y., Shewale, A., 13, 4266. https://doi. org/10.3390/en13164266, , 2020

      137. Estrategias de decisión en sistemas dinámicos: aplicando mapas cognitivos difusos aplicación a un ejemplo socio - económico, Bourguet, S., Lavalle, A., Curia, L., 8, 663–680. https://doi. org/10.4301/S1807-17752011000300008, , 2011

      138. Optimizing the recovery pathway of a net-zero energy wastewater treatment model by balancing energy recovery and eco-efficiency, Liu, R., Xu, J., Wang, H., Shen, Z., Feng, S., 298, 117157. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2021.117157, , 2021

      139. A machine learning approach on the relationship among solar and wind energy production, coal consumption, GDP, and CO2 emissions, Abdul-Wahab, S. A., Magazzino, C., Goosen, M. F. A., Schneider, N., Mele, M., 167, 99–115. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. renene.2020.11.050, , 2021

      140. Evaluating environmental sustainability with the Waste Absorption Footprint (WAF): An application in the Taihu Lake Basin, China, Chen, L. X., Yuan, Z., Min, Q., Li, W., Li, J., Jiao, W., 49, 39–45. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. ecolind.2014.09.032, , 2015

      141. Integrated sizing of hybrid PV-wind-battery system for remote island considering the saturation of each renewable energy resource, Ma, T., Lu, L., 182, 178–190. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. enconman.2018.12.059, , 2019

      142. Co-optimization of multi284 energy system operation, district heating/cooling network and thermal comfort management for buildings, Ghilardi, L. M. P., Bahrami, L., Morini, M., Martelli, E., Moretti, L., 302, 117480. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2021.117480, , 2021

      143. Multi-objective optimization minimizing cost and life cycle emissions of stand-alone PV-wind-diesel systems with batteries storage, Dheeraj, A., Ramírez-Rosado, I. J., Lujano, J., Yusta-Loyo, J. M., Dufo-López, R., 88, 4033–4041. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2011.04.019, , 2011

      144. PDCA cycle theory based avoidance of nursing staff intravenous drug bacterial infection using degree quantitative evaluation model, Sun, X., Kabene, S. M., Fuller, A. M., Jiang, L., Cheng, S., 26, 104377. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. rinp.2021.104377, , 2021

      145. Renewable energy from wastewater - Practical aspects of integrating a wastewater treatment plant into local energy supply concepts, Neugebauer, G., Truger, B., Stoeglehner, G., Kretschmer, F., Bettayeb, M., He, X., Deng, Y., Bansal, R. C., Narodoslawsky, M., Kollmann, R., 155, 119–129. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2016.08.168, , 2017

      146. Causal effect of environmental factors, economic indicators and domestic material consumption using frequency domain causality test, Sarkodie, S. A., 736, 139602. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2020.139602, , 2020

      147. Understanding future emissions from low-carbon power systems by integration of life-cycle assessment and integrated energy modelling, Popp, A., Pehl, M., Madlener, R., 2, 939–945. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41560-017- 0032-9, , 2017

      148. Excess electricity problem in off-grid hybrid renewable energy systems: A comprehensive review from challenges to prevalent solutions, Olsson, G., Liu, Y., Vaziri Rad, M. A., Zhang, K., 212, 538–560. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. renene.2023.05.073 Vietnam Electricity, 2021. Annual Report., , 2023

      149. Aquaculture wastewater treatment and reuse by wind-driven reverse osmosis membrane technology: A pilot study on Coconut Island, Hawaii, Qin, G., de Walle, A. Van, Richman, N. H., Aquac. Eng. 32, 365–378. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. aquaeng.2004.09.002, , 2005

      150. A hybrid renewable system based on wind and solar energy coupled with an electrical storage: Dynamic simulation and economic assessment, u n man ,, Energy 155, 174–189. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2018.05.006, , 2018

      151. Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey using an integrated MCDM approach with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations, Güleryüz, S., Bompard, E., Büyüközkan, G., Energy 123, 149–163. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2017.01.137, , 2017

      152. Multi-criteria risk evaluation by integrating an analytical network process approach into GIS-based sensitivity and uncertainty analyses, Ghorbanzadeh, O., Gibout, S., Franquet, E., Fitó, J., 9, 127–151. https://doi. org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1413012, , 2018

      153. A residential energy management system with bi-level optimization-based bidding strategy for day-ahead bi-directional electricity trading, Majidi, M., Esfetanaj, N. N., Nizami, M. S. H., 261, 114322. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2019.114322, , 2020

      154. Canopy temperature depression as an indication of correlative measure of spot blotch resistance and heat stress tolerance in spring wheat, Auger, F., Rosyara, U. R., Bourguet, S., Vromman, D., Dupriez-Robin, F., 90, 103–107. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X, , 2008

      155. Improving energy efficiency prediction under aberrant measurement using deep compensation networks: A case study of petrochemical process, Luderer, G., Hertwich, E. G., Panjapornpon, C., Humpenöder, F., Arvesen, A., 263, 125837. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2022.125837, , 2023

      156. Optimal Management of Transactive Distribution Electricity Markets With Co-Optimized Bidirectional Energy and Ancillary Service Exchanges, Guo, J., Wu, Y., Chen, Y., Fang, F., Qin, R., Shen, Y., Li, Z., IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 11, 4650–4661. https://doi. org/10.1109/TSG.2020.3003244, , 2020

      157. An extended energy hub approach for load flow analysis of highly coupled district energy networks: Illustration with electricity and heating, Laumert, B., Lacarrière, B., Haurant, P., Ayele, G. T., 212, 850–867. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2017.12.090, , 2018

      158. Intelligent sensor validation for sustainable influent quality monitoring in wastewater treatment plants using stacked denoising autoencoders, Ba-Alawi, A. H., Heo, S., Yoo, C., Vilela, P., Loy-Benitez, J., 43, 102206. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. jwpe.2021.102206, , 2021

      159. Thermo-environ-economic modeling and optimization of an integrated wastewater treatment plant with a combined heat and power generation system, Ifaei P, Moya W, Lee S, Esfahani IJ, Yoo C., 142, 385–401. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. enconman.2017.03.060, , 2017

      160. Thermo-environ-economic modeling and optimization of an integrated wastewater treatment plant with a combined heat and power generation system, Yoo, C. K., Moya, W., Janghorban Esfahani, I., Lee, S., 142, 385–401. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. enconman.2017.03.060, , 2017

      161. Integrating multicriteria analysis with PDCA cycle for sustainable energy planning in Africa: Application to hybrid mini-grid system in Cameroon, Ale, A., E., Roh, J. W., Mintenbeck, K., Suh, D., Owolabi, A. B., Nsafon, B. E. K., Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 37, 100628. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. seta.2020.100628, , 2020

      162. Net energy production and emissions mitigation of domestic wastewater treatment system: A comparison of different biogas-sludge use alternatives, Chen, S., Chen, B., https://doi. org/10.1016/j. biortech.2013.06.128, , 2013

      163. A scalable and robust approach to demand side management for smart grids with uncertain renewable power generation and bi-directional energy trading, Liu, R.-S., Huang, R., 97, 396–407. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. ijepes.2017.11.023, , 2018

      164. Slow pyrolysis as a platform for negative emissions technology: An integration of machine learning models, life cycle assessment, and economic analysis, Colosi, L. M., Luo, H., Cheng, F., 223, 113258. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. enconman.2020.113258, , 2020

      165. An adaptive safety-risk mitigation plan at process-level for sustainable production in chemical industries: An integrated fuzzy-HAZOPbest- worst approach, Nguyen, H.-T., Safder, U., Yoo, C., 339, 130780. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2022.130780, , 2022

      166. Multi-objective decision-making and optimal sizing of a hybrid renewable energy system to meet the dynamic energy demands of a wastewater treatment plant, Nguyen HT, Nhu Nguyen XQ, Yoo C., Safder U, Energy 116570. https://doi. org/10.1016/J. ENERGY.2019.116570, , 2019

      167. Multi-objective decision-making and optimal sizing of a hybrid renewable energy system to meet the dynamic energy demands of a wastewater treatment plant, Nguyen HT, Nhu Nguyen XQ, Safder U, Yoo C., Energy 191, 116570. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2019.116570, , 2020

      168. Multi-objective optimization and decision making of endoreversible combined cycles with consideration of different heat exchangers by finite time thermodynamics, Ghasemkhani, A., Farahat, S., Naserian, M. M., https://doi. org/10.1016/j. enconman.2018.06.046, , 2018

      169. Techno-economic optimization of hybrid photovoltaic/wind generation together with energy storage system in a stand-alone micro-grid subjected to demand response, Amrollahi, M. H., Bathaee, S. M. T., 202, 66–77. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2017.05.116, , 2017

      170. Integration of reverse osmosis desalination with hybrid renewable energy sources and battery storage using electricity supply and demand-driven power pinch analysis, Moya, W., Rashidi, J., Li, Q., He, X., Yoo, C. K., 111, 795–809. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. psep.2017.09.009, , 2017

      171. An efficient cost-reliability optimization model for optimal siting and sizing of energy storage system in a microgrid in the presence of responsible load management, Nojavan, S., Huh, J.-S., Butu, H. M., Energy 139, 89–97. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2017.07.148, , 2017

      172. Weather data and analysis of hybrid photovoltaic-wind power generation systems adapted to a seawater greenhouse desalination unit designed for arid coastal countries, Mahmoudi, H., Spahis, N., Sablani, S. S., Ouagued, A., Perret, J., Desalination 222, 119–127. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. desal.2007.01.135, , 2008

      173. Techno-economic optimization of an off-grid hybrid renewable energy system using metaheuristic optimization approaches – Case of a radio transmitter station in India, Das, M., Singh, M. A. K., 185, 339–352. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. enconman.2019.01.107, , 2019

      174. Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, information and communications technology, and gross domestic product in Iranian economic sectors: A panel causality analysis, Böhm, G., Dehghan Shabani, Z., Shahnazi, R., Energy 169, 1064–1078. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2018.11.062, , 2019

      175. The combined effects of COD/N ratio and nitrate recycling ratio on nitrogen and phosphorus removal in anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic (A2/O)-biological aerated filter (BAF) systems, Chen, Y., Li, B., Ye, L., Peng, Y., 93, 235–242. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. bej.2014.10.005, , 2015

      176. Optimal allocation and sizing of PV/Wind/Split-diesel/Battery hybrid energy system for minimizing life cycle cost, carbon emission and dump energy of remote residential building, Ogunjuyigbe, A. S. O., Hussain, M. A., Bardeeniz, S., https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2016.03.051, , 2016

      177. Optimal demand side management scheduling-based bidirectional regulation of energy distribution network for multi-residential demand response with self-produced renewable energy, Nguyen, H.-T., Safder, U., Loy-Benitez, J., Yoo, C., 322, 119425. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. apenergy.2022.119425, , 2022

      178. Sustainable design of a solar/wind-powered reverse osmosis system with cooperative demand-side water management: A coordinated sizing approach with a fuzzy decision-making model, Yoo, C., Nguyen, H.-T., Ba-Alawi, A. H., 295, 117624. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. enconman.2023.117624, , 2023

      179. Multi-objective optimization of concentrated solar power plants from an energy-water-environment nexus perspective under distinct climatic conditions – Part B: Environ-economic analysis, Zeeshan, M., Ahmad, M., 385, 135689. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2022.135689, , 2023

      180. Techno-economic assessment and smart management of an integrated fuel cell-based energy system with absorption chiller for power, hydrogen, heating, and cooling in an electrified railway network, Nguyen, H.-T., Loy-Benitez, J., Safder, U., Dufo-López, R., Woo, T., Yoo, C., Bernal-Agustín, J. L., 233, 121099. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. energy.2021.121099, , 2021

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼