[단행본] Homo sacer

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

"The work of Giorgio Agamben, one of Italy's most important and original philosophers, has been based on an uncommon erudition in classical traditions of philosophy and rhetoric, the grammarians of late antiquity, Christian theology, and modern philosophy. Recently, Agamben has begun to direct his thinking to the constitution of the social and to some concrete, ethico-political conclusions concerning the state of society today, and the place of the individual within it. In Homo Sacer, Agamben aims to connect the problem of pure possibility, potentiality, and power with the problem of political and social ethics in a context where the latter has lost its previous religious, metaphysical, and cultural grounding. Taking his cue from Foucault's fragmentary analysis of biopolitics, Agamben probes with great breadth, intensity, and acuteness the covert or implicit presence of an idea of biopolitics in the history of traditional political theory. He argues that from the earliest treatises of political theory, notably in Aristotle's notion of man as a political animal, and throughout the history of Western thinking about sovereignty (whether of the king or the state), a notion of sovereignty as power over 'life' is implicit. The reason it remains merely implicit has to do, according to Agamben, with the way the sacred, or the idea of sacrality, becomes indissociable from the idea of sovereignty. Drawing upon Carl Schmitt's idea of the sovereign's status as the exception to the rules he safeguards, and on anthropological research that reveals the close interlinking of the sacred and the taboo, Agamben defines the sacred person as one who can be killed and yet not sacrificed--a paradox he sees as operative in the status of the modern individual living in a system that exerts control over the collective 'naked life' of all individuals"--Provided by publisher.

출처 : http://sungkyunkwanuniv-centlibrary.worldcat.org/oclc/37457953

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 자료는 연구결과물의 원자료이다.
본 연구는 슈미트, 칸토로비츠, 벤야민, 아감벤으로 이어지는 정치신학 관련 논의를 점검하고 이러한 논의가 셰익스피어 텍스트와 어떠한 연관성을 갖는지 분석하는 것을 목적으로 하고 있으며, 이를 위해 아감벤의『호모 사케르』와 『예외 상태』, 벤야민의「폭력비판」, 「역사철학테제」,셰익스피어 작품 『코리올레이너스』의 연관성에 대해 분석하였다.
따라서 본 자료가 연구의 핵심자료로 활용된 것으로 추정된다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Includes bibliographical references (p. 189-196) and index

(출처 : http://www.riss.kr/link?id=M8471452)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

INTRODUCTION1(14)
PART ONE:THE LOGIC OF SOVEREIGNTY15 (56)
1THE PARADOX OF SOVEREIGNTY15 (15)
2`NOMOS BASILEUS'30 (9)
3POTENTIALITY AND LAW39 (10)
4FORM OF LAW49 (14)
THRESHOLD63 (8)
PART TWO:HOMO SACER71 (48)
1HOMO SACER71 (4)
2THE AMBIVALENCE OF THE SACRED75 (6)
3SACRED LIFE81 (6)
4`VITAE NECISQUE POTESTAS'87 (4)
5SOVEREIGN BODY AND SACRED BODY91 (13)
6THE BAN AND THE WOLF104(8)
THRESHOLD112(7)
PART THREE:THE CAMP AS BIOPOLITICAL PARADIGM119(70)
OF THE MODERN
1THE POLITICIZATION OF LIFE119(7)
2BIOPOLITICS AND THE RIGHTS OF MAN126(10)
3LIFE THAT DOES NOT DESERVE TO LIVE136(8)
4`POLITICS, OR GIVING FORM TO THE LIFE OF A144(10)
PEOPLE'
5VP144(10)
6POLITICIZING DEATH160(6)
7THE CAMP AS THE `NOMOS' OF THE MODERN166(15)
THRESHOLD181(8)
BIBLIOGRAPHY189(8)
INDEX OF NAMES197