다산과 대진의 『맹자』 해석 비교 연구 = Comparative Research on Dasan and Dai Zhen’s Interpretation of Mencius

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article compares two interpretations on Mencius, one by Dai Zhen, the representative bibliographical scholar from Qing dynasty, and the onther by Dasan Chong Yag-yong, the most notable scholar of Practical Learning School from Chosun dynasty. What two scholars shared in common was that they strongly opposed the interpretation through NeoConfucian notions and propagated the historical and bibliographical research in interpreting the classical literature.
On the other hand, the two scholars differ sharply in their aim and problematik as they opposed Zhu Xi’s interpretation on Mencius. That is, while Dai Zhen criticized the socio-cultural oppression caused by conceptualized morality that is detached from real-life desire, Dasan, through his theory of ‘nature as moral appetite’, attempted to uncover the fact that determining moral subjectivity is nothing but free-will of humankind, and that humans hold the key to moral responsibility and practice.
In short, Dai Zhen stressed the capacity of mind that discerns the principle (li), and Dasan emphasized the mind’s autonomous making of moral decision to follow the human nature.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article compares two interpretations on Mencius, one by Dai Zhen, the representative bibliographical scholar from Qing dynasty, and the onther by Dasan Chong Yag-yong, the most notable scholar of Practical Learning School from Chosun dynasty. What two scholars shared in common was that they strongly opposed the interpretation through NeoConfucian notions and propagated the historical and bibliographical research in interpreting the classical literature.
On the other hand, the two scholars differ sharply in their aim and problematik as they opposed Zhu Xi’s interpretation on Mencius. That is, while Dai Zhen criticized the socio-cultural oppression caused by conceptualized morality that is detached from real-life desire, Dasan, through his theory of ‘nature as moral appetite’, attempted to uncover the fact that determining moral subjectivity is nothing but free-will of humankind, and that humans hold the key to moral responsibility and practice.
In short, Dai Zhen stressed the capacity of mind that discerns the principle (li), and Dasan emphasized the mind’s autonomous making of moral decision to follow the human nature.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이규성, "정자에서 지식과 직관의 문제 in: 세계와 인간에 대한 동양인의 사유" 천지 283-284, 2003

2 임옥균, "맹자자의소증·원선" 홍익출판사 1999

3 이지형, "맹자요의 해제 in: 茶山孟子要義" 현대실학사 1994

4 줄리아 칭, "맹자와 계몽철학자의 대화" 한울아카데미 81-, 2004

5 문석윤, "다산 정약용의 새로운 도덕이론: 마음에 대한 새로운 이해" 대한철학회 90 : 81-106, 2004

6 김영우, "다산 경학에서 고증(考證)과 의리(義理)의 문제" 한국동양철학회 26 (26): 1-28, 2006

7 "閻氏古文疏證抄 in: 梅氏書平 卷4"

8 "象山先生全集 卷34"

9 黃俊傑, "東亞近世儒學思潮의 新動向- 戴東原, 伊藤仁齋와 茶山의 孟學에 대한 解釋" 茶山學硏究院 6 : 1984

10 山井湧, "明淸思想史硏究" 東京大出版會 395-, 1980

11 韓英, "戴震의 氣學과 丁若鏞 實學의 근대성 비교연구" 한국학중앙연구원 2001

12 금장태, "戴震의 氣學的 世界觀과 茶山의 實學 in: 다산실학탐구" 소학사 2001

13 "心經總義 in: 與猶堂全書"

14 "孟子要義"

15 "孟子字義疏證"

16 "告子 上 in: 孟子"