유체-구조 연계 해석을 위한 보간 기법 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The fluid-structure interaction analysis such as a static aeroelastic analysis requires the result of each analysis as an input to the other analysis. Usually the grids for the fluid analysis and the structural analysis are different. so the results should be transformed properly for each other. The Infinite Plate Spline(IPS) and the Thin Plate Spline(TPS) are used in interpolating the displacement and the pressure. In this study, such interpolation methods are compared with kriging which provides a precise response surface. The static aeroelastic analysis is performed for the supersonic flow field with shock waves and the pressure field is interpolated by the TPS and kriging. The TPS shows tendency to weaken the shock strength, whereas kriging preserves the shock strength.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Schmitt, V., "Pressure Distributions on the ONERA-M6-Wing at Transonic Mach Numbers" AGARD AR 138-, 1979

2 Park, S.H., "On the Dissipation Mechanism of Godunov-type Schemes" 188 (188): 524-542, 2003

3 Simpson, T.W., "Kriging Models for Global Approximations in Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization" 39 (39): 2233-2241, 2001

4 Harder, R.L., "Interpolation Using Surface Splines" 9 (9): 189-191, 1972

5 Smith, M.J., "Evaluation of Computational Algorithms Suitable for Fluid-Structure Interactions" 37 (37): 282-294, 2000

6 Kim, Y., "Drag Prediction Workshop Results Using the Parallel Multigrid Solver KFLOW3D" AIAA 2nd Drag Prediction Workshop 2003

7 Sacks, J., "Designs for Computer Experiments" 31 (31): 41-47, 1989

8 Sacks, J., "Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments" 4 (4): 409-435, 1989

9 Lophaven, S.N., "Aspects of the Matlab Toolbox DACE" Technical Report 2002

10 Donato, G., "Approximation Methods for Thin Plate Spline Mappings and Principal Warps" 2003

11 Yates, E.C., Jr, "AGARD Standard Aeroelastic Configurations for Dynamic Response I-Wing 445.6" NASA 1987

12 Lophaven, S.N., "A Matlab Kriging Toolbox Version 2.0" 2002