RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    부동산 양도소득세제의 개편방향에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Improvement for Capital Gain Tax System of Real Estate

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106008015

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    1. CONTENTS
    (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
    The purpose of this study is to review and evaluate the current capital gain tax system of real estate and think about Improvement.
    (2) RESEARCH METHOD
    This study is conducted by field investigation and confirmation of practical contents after access to relevant webpages, as well as domestic and foreign literature review.
    (3) RESEARCH FINDINGS
    This study set out to review the reorganization directions of capital gain tax of real estate in a situation where capital gain tax is used as an important means of real estate policies and the taxation of capital gain has become an issue. The study thus examined the nature and current state of capital gain tax and the capital gain tax systems of advanced countries such as Japan and the United States As a result, the capital gain tax of real estate of South Korea turned out to have some problems in the aspect of tax equity such as the narrower scope of property to be taxed for capital gain and the relatively higher tax rate. The findings led to the following Improvements.
    2. RESULTS
    First, the current capital gain tax of real estate is heavily burdened compared with other property items of capital gain and thus is unequal in terms of taxation when considering the grand principles of the Tax Law including tax equity and neutrality. One of the reorganization directions should address those problems. Specifically, the scope of property to be omitted from taxation should be narrowed down. The capital gain tax rate of real estate should be lowered or categorized as a short or long term capital gain to reduce the long term capital gain to a low level.
    Secondly, the scope of tax exemption and reduction, which causes a permanent loss to tax revenues, should be narrowed down in the taxation stage of capital gain tax of real estate. If there is a need for tax support, it should be converted into tax deferral or income deduction.
    Finally, the current tax exemption for a house for a household should be improved as an income deduction system, in which case the deduction amount that is about a half of the Japanese counterpart should be recognized by taking the deduction amounts and national incomes of Japan and the United States.
    번역하기

    1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to review and evaluate the current capital gain tax system of real estate and think about Improvement. (2) RESEARCH METHOD This study is conducted by field investigation and confirmation...

    1. CONTENTS
    (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
    The purpose of this study is to review and evaluate the current capital gain tax system of real estate and think about Improvement.
    (2) RESEARCH METHOD
    This study is conducted by field investigation and confirmation of practical contents after access to relevant webpages, as well as domestic and foreign literature review.
    (3) RESEARCH FINDINGS
    This study set out to review the reorganization directions of capital gain tax of real estate in a situation where capital gain tax is used as an important means of real estate policies and the taxation of capital gain has become an issue. The study thus examined the nature and current state of capital gain tax and the capital gain tax systems of advanced countries such as Japan and the United States As a result, the capital gain tax of real estate of South Korea turned out to have some problems in the aspect of tax equity such as the narrower scope of property to be taxed for capital gain and the relatively higher tax rate. The findings led to the following Improvements.
    2. RESULTS
    First, the current capital gain tax of real estate is heavily burdened compared with other property items of capital gain and thus is unequal in terms of taxation when considering the grand principles of the Tax Law including tax equity and neutrality. One of the reorganization directions should address those problems. Specifically, the scope of property to be omitted from taxation should be narrowed down. The capital gain tax rate of real estate should be lowered or categorized as a short or long term capital gain to reduce the long term capital gain to a low level.
    Secondly, the scope of tax exemption and reduction, which causes a permanent loss to tax revenues, should be narrowed down in the taxation stage of capital gain tax of real estate. If there is a need for tax support, it should be converted into tax deferral or income deduction.
    Finally, the current tax exemption for a house for a household should be improved as an income deduction system, in which case the deduction amount that is about a half of the Japanese counterpart should be recognized by taking the deduction amounts and national incomes of Japan and the United States.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 서울경제신문, "파생상품 매매 차익 자본이득세 매긴다"

    2 이상신, "주택을 중심으로 한 현 정부의 부동산정책 평가와 차기 정부의 과제" 한국부동산학회 (51) : 252-264, 2012

    3 장기용, "주택에 대한 양도소득세 중과세제도의 헌법적 한계" 한국부동산학회 (43) : 267-284, 2010

    4 박훈, "주택에 대한 양도소득세 비과세 및 감면제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구" 한국세무학회 26 (26): 149-175, 2009

    5 박상혁, "주택양도소득세의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ­ -비과세․감면 및 중과세 제도를 중심으로 -­" 한국부동산학회 (48) : 195-214, 2012

    6 이태로, "조세법강의" 박영사 2011

    7 윤상필, "재개발․재건축사업의 개발이익 추정에 관한 연구" 한국부동산학회 (49) : 231-245, 2012

    8 유재선, "자본이득세제에 관한 연구" 대한경영교육학회 16 : 2009

    9 한만수, "자본이득과세제도에 관한 원론적 고찰과 판례" 한국세법학회 4 : 1998

    10 오윤, "자본이득과세제도 개선방안" 한국국제조세협회 28 (28): 177-221, 2012

    1 서울경제신문, "파생상품 매매 차익 자본이득세 매긴다"

    2 이상신, "주택을 중심으로 한 현 정부의 부동산정책 평가와 차기 정부의 과제" 한국부동산학회 (51) : 252-264, 2012

    3 장기용, "주택에 대한 양도소득세 중과세제도의 헌법적 한계" 한국부동산학회 (43) : 267-284, 2010

    4 박훈, "주택에 대한 양도소득세 비과세 및 감면제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구" 한국세무학회 26 (26): 149-175, 2009

    5 박상혁, "주택양도소득세의 개선방안에 관한 연구 ­ -비과세․감면 및 중과세 제도를 중심으로 -­" 한국부동산학회 (48) : 195-214, 2012

    6 이태로, "조세법강의" 박영사 2011

    7 윤상필, "재개발․재건축사업의 개발이익 추정에 관한 연구" 한국부동산학회 (49) : 231-245, 2012

    8 유재선, "자본이득세제에 관한 연구" 대한경영교육학회 16 : 2009

    9 한만수, "자본이득과세제도에 관한 원론적 고찰과 판례" 한국세법학회 4 : 1998

    10 오윤, "자본이득과세제도 개선방안" 한국국제조세협회 28 (28): 177-221, 2012

    11 김성희, "서울시 주택재개발사업의 조합원 기대이익 영향요인 분석" 한국부동산학회 (50) : 151-163, 2012

    12 민태욱, "부동산자본이득에 대한 과세" 한국세법학회 12 (12): 50-85, 2006

    13 송경섭, "부동산시장의 주택매매가격지수와 주식시장 종합주가지수 및 산업별지수와의 관계 연구" 한국부동산학회 (48) : 77-93, 2012

    14 최완호, "부동산 개발이익환수제도의 개선방안 - 전문가 의식조사를 중심으로 -" 한국부동산학회 (45) : 48-62, 2011

    15 서울경제신문, "미국 자본이득세에 발목잡힌 증시"

    16 金子宏, "租稅法" 弘文堂 2009

    17 金子宏, "所得稅の理論と課題" 稅務經理協會 2001

    18 "http://www.nta.go.jp/taxanswer/shotoku/1440.htm"

    19 "http://www.nta.go.jp/taxanswer/joto/3560.htm"

    20 "http://www.nta.go.jp/taxanswer/joto/3552.htm"

    21 "http://www.nta.go.jp/taxanswer/joto/3305.htm"

    22 "http://www.nta.go.jp/taxanswer/joto/3302.htm"

    23 "http://www.nta.go.jp/taxanswer/joto/3211.htm"

    24 "http://www.nta.go.jp/taxanswer/joto/3105.htm"

    25 "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1221"

    26 "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1"

    27 매일경제신문, "[매경의 창] 양도소득세 중과세 속히 폐지해야"

    28 Hoffman, "Individual Income Taxes" Cengage Learning 2010

    29 Peter W. Bernstein, "Ernst&Young Tax Guide 2013" John Wiley&sons 2013

    30 Miller, "Business Law Today" 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.61 2.61 1.87
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.49 1.25 0.704 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼