RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    조직 상황을 고려한 DEA 기반의 벤치마킹 프레임워크 = A DEA-based Benchmarking Framework in terms of Organizational Context

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104183057

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Data envelopment analysis(DEA) has proved to be powerful for benchmarking and has been widely used in a variety of settings since the advent of it. DEA can be used in identifying the best performing units to be benchmarked against as well as in providing actionable measure for improvement of a organization's performance. However, the selection of performance benchmarks is a matter of both technical production possibilities and organizational policy considerations, managerial preferences and external
    restrictions. In that regards, DEA has a limited value in benchmarking because it focuses on only technical production possibilities. This research proposes a new perspective in using DEA and a framework for benchmarking to select benchmarks that are both feasible and desirable in terms of organizational context. To do this, the concept of local and global efficiency is newly proposed. To show how useful the suggested concept and framework are, a case study is addressed.
    번역하기

    Data envelopment analysis(DEA) has proved to be powerful for benchmarking and has been widely used in a variety of settings since the advent of it. DEA can be used in identifying the best performing units to be benchmarked against as well as in provid...

    Data envelopment analysis(DEA) has proved to be powerful for benchmarking and has been widely used in a variety of settings since the advent of it. DEA can be used in identifying the best performing units to be benchmarked against as well as in providing actionable measure for improvement of a organization's performance. However, the selection of performance benchmarks is a matter of both technical production possibilities and organizational policy considerations, managerial preferences and external
    restrictions. In that regards, DEA has a limited value in benchmarking because it focuses on only technical production possibilities. This research proposes a new perspective in using DEA and a framework for benchmarking to select benchmarks that are both feasible and desirable in terms of organizational context. To do this, the concept of local and global efficiency is newly proposed. To show how useful the suggested concept and framework are, a case study is addressed.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Mcmullen, P. R., "Using simulation and data envelopment analysis to compare assembly line balancing solutions" 11 : 149-168, 1998

    2 Manandhar, R., "The evaluation of bank branch performance using data envelopment analysis: A framework" 13 : 1-17, 2002

    3 Spendolini M. J., "The benchmarking book" America management association 1992

    4 Grupp, H., "Technometrics as a missing link in science and technology indicators. In: Measuring the Dynamics of Technological Change" Pinter 57-76, 1990

    5 Banker, R., "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis" 30 : 1078-1092, 1984

    6 Alder, N., "Review of ranking method in the data envelopment analysis context" 140 : 249-265, 2002

    7 Lovell, C. A. K., "Radial DEA models without inputs or without output" 118 : 46-51, 1999

    8 Dyson, R., "Performance measurement, managerial control and data envelopment analysis" (113) : 1993

    9 Post, T., "Performance benchmarking using interactive data envelopment analysis" 115 : 472-487, 1999

    10 Smith, P., "Outcome-related performance indicators and organisational control in the public sector" 3 : 135-151, 1993

    1 Mcmullen, P. R., "Using simulation and data envelopment analysis to compare assembly line balancing solutions" 11 : 149-168, 1998

    2 Manandhar, R., "The evaluation of bank branch performance using data envelopment analysis: A framework" 13 : 1-17, 2002

    3 Spendolini M. J., "The benchmarking book" America management association 1992

    4 Grupp, H., "Technometrics as a missing link in science and technology indicators. In: Measuring the Dynamics of Technological Change" Pinter 57-76, 1990

    5 Banker, R., "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis" 30 : 1078-1092, 1984

    6 Alder, N., "Review of ranking method in the data envelopment analysis context" 140 : 249-265, 2002

    7 Lovell, C. A. K., "Radial DEA models without inputs or without output" 118 : 46-51, 1999

    8 Dyson, R., "Performance measurement, managerial control and data envelopment analysis" (113) : 1993

    9 Post, T., "Performance benchmarking using interactive data envelopment analysis" 115 : 472-487, 1999

    10 Smith, P., "Outcome-related performance indicators and organisational control in the public sector" 3 : 135-151, 1993

    11 Charnes, A., "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units" 2 : 429-444, 1978

    12 Gonzalez, E., "From efficiency measurement to efficiency improvement: The choice of a relevant benchmark" 133 : 512-520, 2001

    13 Luo, X., "Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks-an application of data envelopment analysis" 56 : 627-635, 2003

    14 Grosskopf, S., "Evaluating performance in Chicago public high schools in the wake of decentralization" 20 : 1-14, 2001

    15 Chang, H. H., "Determinants of hospital efficiency: the case of central government-owned hospitals in Taiwan" 26 (26): 307-317, 1998

    16 Athanassopoulos, A. D., "Data envelopment scenario analysis for setting targets to electricity generating plants" 115 : 413-428, 1999

    17 Cooper, W. W., "Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEAsolver software" Kluwer academic publishers 2000

    18 Tata, J., "Benchmarking quality management practices: U.S. versus Costa Rica" 8 (8): 37-51, 2000

    19 Donthu, N., "Benchmarking marketing productiviey using data envelopment analysis" 58 (58): 1474-1482, 2005

    20 Ammons, D. N., "Benchmarking as a performance management tool: experiences among municipalities in North Carolina" 12 (12): 106-124, 2000

    21 Ross, A., "An integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center performance using DEA modeling" 20 : 19-32, 2002

    22 Sueyoshi, T., "Abenchmark approach for baseball evaluation" 115 : 429-448, 1999

    23 Shafer, S. M., "A framework for measuring the efficiency of organizational investments in information technology using data envelopment analysis" 28 : 125-141, 2000

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-07-01 등재 등재후보로 하락(현장점검) (기타) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-03 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.88 0.88 0.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.93 1 0.751 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼