RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    일반 논문 : 혼합식 선거제도로의 변화와 정치적 효과: 뉴질랜드, 일본, 그리고 한국을 중심으로 = A Comparative Analysis in New Zealand, Japan, and S. Korea

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to compare the political effects of the mixed electoral systems in New Zealand, Japan, and S. Korea. These countries have changed to mixed electoral systems to accomplish the votes-seats proportionality and the stability of party politics since 1990`s. This study used the indices such as ``electoral disproportionality``, ``effective number of parties``, and ``electoral volatility`` to analyses the political effects of electoral reform. The results of the analysis are as follows: The mixed member proportional system (MMP) of the New Zealand has made the positive political effects on the votes-seats proportionality and the stability of party system. However, the mixed member majority system (MMM) of Japan and Korea has not made the satisfactory political consequences on the electoral disproportionality and the electoral volatility in general elections. In other words, these countries have been increasing the electoral disproportionality and the instability of party system. Particularly, the party politics have been continuing that electoral competition depended on the stronger person and region than the political ideology and public policy. To conclude, this study argues that the mixed member proportional system is stronger effects on the increasing electoral proportionality and the stability of party politics than the mixed member majority system.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to compare the political effects of the mixed electoral systems in New Zealand, Japan, and S. Korea. These countries have changed to mixed electoral systems to accomplish the votes-seats proportionality and the stability o...

    The purpose of this study is to compare the political effects of the mixed electoral systems in New Zealand, Japan, and S. Korea. These countries have changed to mixed electoral systems to accomplish the votes-seats proportionality and the stability of party politics since 1990`s. This study used the indices such as ``electoral disproportionality``, ``effective number of parties``, and ``electoral volatility`` to analyses the political effects of electoral reform. The results of the analysis are as follows: The mixed member proportional system (MMP) of the New Zealand has made the positive political effects on the votes-seats proportionality and the stability of party system. However, the mixed member majority system (MMM) of Japan and Korea has not made the satisfactory political consequences on the electoral disproportionality and the electoral volatility in general elections. In other words, these countries have been increasing the electoral disproportionality and the instability of party system. Particularly, the party politics have been continuing that electoral competition depended on the stronger person and region than the political ideology and public policy. To conclude, this study argues that the mixed member proportional system is stronger effects on the increasing electoral proportionality and the stability of party politics than the mixed member majority system.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼