하니문의 동학(動學)과 구조의 정학(靜學): 문재인 정부의 외교정책, 변화와 연속성 = Dynamics of Honeymoon and Statics of Structure: Changes and Continuity of Foreign Policy in the Moon Jae-In Administration

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A seismic change is under way in diplomatic topography surrounding the Korean Peninsula. A new dynamic is being generated that could lead to a breakthrough in the nuclear stalemate and to an end of hostility between the two Koreas. Moon Administration's bold and creative foreign policy, which is alleged to place South Korea in the “driver's seat”, is probably responsible for what is happening on the Korean Peninsula. However, on the other hand, Moon Administration's foreign policy shows a lot of continuity with foreign policy of previous conservative governments. In particular, the Moon government's emphasis on the vitality of the ROK-US alliance and its commitment to close coordination with the US in dealing with nuclear issues of North Korea is the hallmark of the continuity in South Korea's foreign policy. Emphasizing and sharing the notion of the continuities in foreign policy could contribute to social integration by garnering bi-partisan support. It could also spawn sense of stability, predictability, and confidence to diplomatic counterparts in other countries. And it could help avoid the negative effects of expectation-reality gap in the event that the outcome of all the diplomatic endeavor falls short of expectation held by citizens.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최진우, "문화외교의 이론과 실천: 개념의 재구성과 목표의 재설정" 동서문제연구원 25 (25): 257-277, 2013

2 청와대, "국정과제"

3 연합뉴스, "文대통령 ‘취임 후 7개국 방문･정상회담 40여회…외교공백 메워’"

4 위문희, "文 대통령, ‘실사구시하는 실용 외교, 외교영역 다변화하는 균형 있는 외교해야’" 중앙일보

5 기획재정부, "“내 삶을 바꾸는” 2018년 예산안"

6 Baldwin, David A., "Success and Failure in Foreign Policy" 30 : 167-182, 2000

7 Bovens, Mark, "Revisiting the Study of Policy Failures" 23 (23): 653-666, 2016

8 Nye, Joseph S., "Public Power and Soft Power" (616) : 94-109, 2008

9 Pressman, Jeremy, "Power without Influence: The Bush Administration’s Foreign Policy Failure in the Middle East" 33 (33): 149-179, 2009

10 Young, Oran R., "Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society" 45 (45): 281-308, 1991

11 Glade, William, "Issues in the Genesis and Organization of Cultural Diplomacy: A Brief Critical History" 39 (39): 240-259, 2009

12 Starkey, Brigid, "International Negotiation in a Complex World" Rowman and Littlefield 2015

13 De Sá Guimarães, Feliciano, "From Middle Powers to Entrepreneurial Powers in World Politics: Brazil’s Successes and Failures in International Crises" 59 (59): 26-46, 2017

14 Morin, Jean-Frédéric, "Foreign Policy Analysis: Toolbox" Palgrave 2018

15 Hudson, Valerie M., "Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory" Rowman & Littlefield 2014

16 Bunce, Valerie, "Do New Leaders Make Difference?: Executive Succession and Public Policy under Capitalism and Socialism" 1981

17 McConnell, Allan, "A Public Policy Approach to Understanding the Nature and Causes of Foreign Policy Failure" 23 (23): 667-684, 2016

18 Mark, Simon, "A Greater Role for Cultural Diplomacy" Netherlands Institute of international Relations Clingendael 2009

19 기획재정부, "2019년도 예산안 편성 및 기금운용계획안 작성지침"

20 기획재정부, "2018년 추경예산안"

21 기획재정부, "2017년 추경예산안"