환경분쟁해결 수단으로서 징벌적 손해배상제도

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Environmental pollution accidents, for example chemical accident, explosion accident occurred one after another, which threaten public health and safety to daily increasing explosion of public anxiety. However an effective remedy system for the victim is insufficient. Company for the purpose of profitability in general, on the other hand, is generating environmental pollution purposely and constantly, in addition, for the reason that sanctions is so weak in case that revenue is higher than the penalty the vicious cycle of environmental infringement continues. Given the difficulty of restitution or long-term commitment from the pollution of the environment, it is more important to prevent contamination. Therefore, it is imperative to see the punitive damages provisions as a means of punishment and prevention of pollution of the environment.
The punitive damages are necessary to achieve justice system more in environmental areas can not be solved by a rule of public law as shown above. Because punitive damages would be calculated, being considered significance and repetition of illegal act, necessity of prevention, punitive damages is very suitable system, having the function of proactive prevention as well as post-regulation means. Also punitive damages could serve as a source of pollution compensation fund.
It is true that punitive damages are reluctant to be introduced for the reason of excess of damages and distinction civil law field from criminal law field which is Continental law system. However Considering the facts that three times of damages are introduced in “Fair Transactions in Subcontracting Act” and that the precautionary principle is one of the environmental law principles, It is a very good means to use th punitive damages systems in environmental law field.
To strengthen the liability for the increased risk of environmental damage is the better way to access the precautionary principle for environmental protection and social security in the time that the environmental damages are increasing due to the advanced industrial society.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서설
• Ⅱ. 징벌적 손해배상제도의 기능
• Ⅲ. 사전배려의 원칙으로서 징벌적 손해배상제도
• Ⅳ. 미국 환경오염에 대한 징벌적 손해배상제도
• Ⅴ. 우리나라 징벌적 손해배상제도 도입 현황
• Ⅵ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 손윤하, "환경침해와 민사소송" 청림출판사 2005

2 최현태, "환경침해영역에서의 징벌적 손해배상제도의 기능" 한양법학회 24 (24): 503-532, 2013

3 박창석, "환경분쟁의 사전예방적 해결수단에 대한 검토" 한양법학회 24 (24): 197-219, 2013

4 배병호, "환경분쟁 해결을 위한 징벌적 손해배상제도 도입에 관한 고찰" 한국환경법학회 35 (35): 107-133, 2013

5 함태성, "환경법(제6판)" 박영사 2013

6 김홍균, "환경법" 사법연수원 2009

7 이명갑, "제재적 위자료의 입론(1)" 1987

8 조홍식, "代案的 紛爭解決制度(ADR)의 經濟學― 環境紛爭調停制度에 대한 評價를 中心으로 ―" 법학연구소 47 (47): 13-75, 2006

9 Clerk, "Torts" Sweet & Maxwell 2006

10 Schwartz, "The Costs of a Legal System" 4 : 75-, 1972

11 Wheeler Malcolm E., "The Constitutional Case Reforming Punitive Damage Procedures" 69 : 269-, 1983

12 O'Connell Lori Woodward, "The Case for Continuing to Award Punitive Damages" 36 : 893-, 2001

13 Ausness Rechard C., "Retribution and Deterrence: The Role of Punitive Damages in the Products Liability Litigation" 74 (74): 1985

14 Sebok Anthony J., "Punitive Damages: From Myth To Theory" 92 : 957-, 2007

15 Polinsky Mitchell, "Punitive Damages: An Economic Analysis" 111 : 869-, 1998

16 Edelman Wilson, "Punitive Damages Review"

17 Schlueter Linda L., "Punitive Damages" Lexis 2000

18 McQuality Christy Lynn, "No harm, No foul?: An Argument For The Allowance of Punitive Damages without Compensatory Damages under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981A" 59 : 643-, 2002

19 Ashford Nicholas A., "Implementing the Precautionary Principle" Nicolas de Sadeleer 2007

20 Ellis Dorsey D., "Fairness and Efficiency in the Law of Punitive Damages" 56 (56): 1982

21 Note, "Exemplary Damages In The Law Of Torts" 70 : 517-, 1957

22 Koenig Thomas, "Crimtortsas Corporate Just Deserts" 31 : 289-, 1998

23 Tabarrok Alexander, "Court Politics: The Political Economy of Tort Awards" 42 : 157-, 1999

24 Gotanda John Y., "Awarding Punitive Damages In International Commercial Arbitrations In the Wake of Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc" 38 : 59-, 1997

25 Galligan Thomas C., "Augmented Awards: The Efficient Evolution of Punitive Damages" 51 (51): 1990

26 Owen David G., "A Punitive Damages Overview: Functions, Problems and Reform" 39 : 363-, 1994