RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    보험계약의 해지환급금과 이혼시 재산분할 = 대전가정법원 2014. 5. 22. 선고 2013르1147 판결

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100229175

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    If a couple is divorced, they have to organize the property aspects as well as the identity relation. The Civil Code provide that the property achieved by cooperation during the marriage life could be liquidated. However, there are the several discussions the extent to which will be the subject of division of property in divorce.
    We think that this is a significant judgment because this covered the surrender value of insurance contract and division of property in divorce, not subject of division of property in divorce discussed already. We think, nevertheless, there is a problems in the concluding of this judgment at a number of respects.
    This judgment include the surrender value of insurance contact paid before the marriage as the subjects of division of property in divorce. But, we wonder where we can include the surrender value of insurance contract paid before the marriage as the subjects of division of property in divorce, in recognition that the plaintiff contributed to keep the insurance contract by do domestic labor directly and indirectly only from the disposition of property.
    In this thesis we examined the general of division of property in divorce and the legal nature of surrender value. And then we discussed whether the surrender value of insurance contract can be the subjects of division of property in divorce.
    It is not advisable to terminate the insurance contract easily and then divide the surrender value of insurance contract when a couple is divorce. Therefore we should not include the surrender value of insurance contact paid before the marriage as the subjects of division of property in divorce. That is not reasonable, especially when one of a couple had paid the premium before the marriage or when other relatives have paid the premium substitutingly. This judgment have a problem in respect that it included the surrender value of insurance contact paid before the marriage as the subjects of division of property in divorce. So we think the part of this judgment needs to amend in Supreme Court.
    번역하기

    If a couple is divorced, they have to organize the property aspects as well as the identity relation. The Civil Code provide that the property achieved by cooperation during the marriage life could be liquidated. However, there are the several discuss...

    If a couple is divorced, they have to organize the property aspects as well as the identity relation. The Civil Code provide that the property achieved by cooperation during the marriage life could be liquidated. However, there are the several discussions the extent to which will be the subject of division of property in divorce.
    We think that this is a significant judgment because this covered the surrender value of insurance contract and division of property in divorce, not subject of division of property in divorce discussed already. We think, nevertheless, there is a problems in the concluding of this judgment at a number of respects.
    This judgment include the surrender value of insurance contact paid before the marriage as the subjects of division of property in divorce. But, we wonder where we can include the surrender value of insurance contract paid before the marriage as the subjects of division of property in divorce, in recognition that the plaintiff contributed to keep the insurance contract by do domestic labor directly and indirectly only from the disposition of property.
    In this thesis we examined the general of division of property in divorce and the legal nature of surrender value. And then we discussed whether the surrender value of insurance contract can be the subjects of division of property in divorce.
    It is not advisable to terminate the insurance contract easily and then divide the surrender value of insurance contract when a couple is divorce. Therefore we should not include the surrender value of insurance contact paid before the marriage as the subjects of division of property in divorce. That is not reasonable, especially when one of a couple had paid the premium before the marriage or when other relatives have paid the premium substitutingly. This judgment have a problem in respect that it included the surrender value of insurance contact paid before the marriage as the subjects of division of property in divorce. So we think the part of this judgment needs to amend in Supreme Court.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 사실관계
    • Ⅱ. 법원의 판단
    • Ⅲ. 판례평석
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 사실관계
    • Ⅱ. 법원의 판단
    • Ⅲ. 판례평석
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼