노동조합 활동권과 시설관리권

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Despite the rights on facilitation usage must be guaranteed for lawful labor union activities, it also coincides with the right of management of facilities that is derived from property rights. Since labor union members ought to utilize business facilities in its nature of business, it is rather inevitable to face collision of another law referred as the property rights (the rights of facilitation management). To solve this problem rationally, the research shows following suggestions.
The right of management of facilities and the right of use of facilities shall be abused by no more than the claimers; a distinction between inter-and intra- business labor union is not effective in an act of abuse, and the referred labor union shall be accepted as a lawful institution regardless of its quantity, whether singular or plural.
To recognize the act of pervasion,
1) The labor union uses the company's facilities without a serious negotiation or mutual consent, which cannot be assured by the Union Labor Act (abuse of the right of use of facilities)
2) The company does not correspond to the union labor's effort to reach an agreement and refuses the union's use of the facilities, which breaches the Labor Law and the intention of the Supreme Court for the purpose of the management of company (abuse of the right of management of facilities).
Therefore an abuse of the right of management of facilities shall be determined by the Union's effort to use the company's facilities and the company's correspondence to the effort.
The detailed criterion of consideration is shown as follows:
1) Condition and figuration of using facilities,
2) Content and characteristics of the breached right of management of facilities,
3) The union's response to the safety protection of facilities,
4) An option for an alternative facility.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 문제제기
• Ⅱ. 노동조합 활동권과 시설관리권의 법적 성질
• Ⅲ. 초기업적 조합활동과 시설관리권 행사의 판단
• Ⅳ. 결론에 갈음하여
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박종희, "산별노동조합체제하에서 조합활동에 관한 연구" , (27) : 2006

2 김성수, "산별노동조합의 소송상 쟁점, 산별노동조합의 실태에 관한 비교법적 분석" 2010

3 이승욱, "산별노동조합의 노동법상 쟁점과 과제" 서울대학교노동법연구회 12 (12): 6-240, 2002

4 송강직, "노동법에서의 사용자의 재산권 전개 - 일본에서의 시설이용권 논의를 중심으로" 서울대학교노동법연구회 (19) : 523-564, 2005

5 하경효, "노동법사례연습(제2판)" 박영사 2006

6 김유성, "노동법Ⅱ" 법문사 1997

7 임종률, "노동법(제8판)" 박영사 2008

8 김형배, "노동법(제19판)" 박영사 2010

9 이영희, "노동법" 법문사 2001

10 박홍규, "노동단체법" 삼영사 2000

11 최영호, "기업내 조합활동의 정당성 기준" , (8) : 1998

12 최영호, "기업내 조합활동의 정당성" , (4) : 1994

13 今野順夫, "組合のビラ配布活動と施設管理権" (106) : 1977

14 松岡三郎, "日本における組合専従の取扱いとその法的性格" , (37) : 1960

15 菅野和夫, "施設管理権行使と支配介入─オリエンタルモーター事件, in 労働判例百選(第7版)" 有斐閣 2002

16 籾井常喜, "施設管理権と組合活動․施設利用の拒否と不当労働行為の成否" , (396) : 1960

17 山口浩一朗, "労働組合法(第2版)" 有斐閣 294-, 1996