도일(渡日) 백제유민(百濟遺民)의 정체성 변화 고찰 = The Baekjae refugees who immigrated to Japan, and the identity changes they went through

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of examining the identity changes the Baekjae migrants (refugees) went through after they lost their home country, is to determine how the status of the Baekjae migrants changed, and decide how to portray them in the history of the Baekjae dynasty. A ‘social identity’ means ‘self- definition in relationships with others’. When Baekjae fell and Baekjae migrants massively moved to Japan, ancient Japan was in the process of constructing a constitutional country under the power of the Japanese Emperor, and through this process the identity of ‘Japanese’ and the concept of ‘Japanese consciousness,’ which would treat Baekjae migrants as ‘others,’ were just being developed. In other words, when the Baekjae migrants settled down in Japan, there was not a strong sense of ‘identity’ in the Japanese society. So, ancient Japan actively incorporated Baekjae migrates into its own society.
Baekjae migrants were mostly members of the Revival army which resisted the Shilla-Tang alliance, so immigration to Japan was obviously done actively and enthusiastically. Also, the constant cultural exchange with Japan established a cultural, religious, and linguistic similarity, and such historical conditions would have contributed to the Baekjae migrants’ adaptation to the ancient Japanese society.
By analyzing the perspective of the Baekjae migrants which can be called ‘self-definition,’ and the attitude of the ancient Japanese society toward the Baekjae migrants that can be called ‘definition by others,’ we can see that the Baekjae migrants, especially the ruling class, adapted remarkably easily to the new society. The adaptation and assimilation to a new society was a process of acquiring a new social group identity, and also a process of losing the original one as Baekjae citizens. This process also coincided with the construction of a law-governed state in ancient Japanese society.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 머리말
• 1. 집단정체성의 표징 요소
• 2. 백제유민집단에 대한 고대 일본사회의 조건
• 3. 백제유민집단의 고대일본사회에 대한 대응태도
• 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박윤선, "｢渡日 百濟遺民의 活動｣, 숙명여대석사학위논문 ; 1996" 2 : 1995

2 박은경, "화교의 종족 정체성과 이동의 관계" 한국인문사회과학원 23 : 1982

3 정한울, "한국인의 국가정체성과 한국정치" 동아시아연구원 2007

4 박순발, "한국 고대사에서 종족성의 인식" 한국고대사학회 (44) : 5-19, 2006

5 윤인진, "코리안 디아스포라-재외한인의 이주, 적응, 정체성-" 고려대학교 출판부 2003

6 김은숙, "일본 율령국가의 백제왕씨, In 백제유민들의 활동" 충청남도역사문화연구원 2007

7 홍석우, "유라시아지역의 국가-민족 정체성" 한울 2010

8 연민수, "왜로 이주한 백제인과 그 활동, In 백제유민들의 활동" 충남역사문화연구원 2007

9 Benedict Anderson, "상상의 공동체 : 민족주의의 기원과 전파에 대한 성찰" 나남출판사 2002

10 조홍식, "민족의 개념에 관한 정치사회학적 고찰" 한국정치학회 39 (39): 129-146, 2005

11 Eric Hobsbawm, "만들어진 전통" 휴머니스트 1983

12 윤인진, "독립국가연합 고려인의 생활과 의식" 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 2002

13 이용필, "근강정권의 씨족기반과 그 성격" 7 : 1998

14 노명호, "고려국가와 집단의식: 자위공동체, 삼국유민, 삼한일통, 해동천자의 천하" 서울대학교출판문화원 2009

15 胡口靖夫, "近江朝と渡來人" 雄山閣 1996

16 都守熙, "百濟語 語彙 硏究" 제이앤씨 2005

17 市古晃, "百濟王氏と百濟郡, In 檢證古代日本と百濟" 大巧社 2003

18 覓敏生, "百濟王姓の成立と日本古代帝國" 317 : 1989

19 山尾幸久, "河內飛鳥と渡來氏族, In 古代を考える河內飛鳥" 吉川弘文館 1989

20 村尾次郞, "氏姓崩壞に現はれたる歸化人同化の一形相" 52 (52): 1941

21 平野邦雄, "歸化人と古代國家" 吉川弘文館 1993

22 關晃, "歸化人" 至文堂 1956

23 堀敏一, "東ｱｼﾞｱの中の古代日本, In 硏文選書75" 硏文出版, 山本書店出版部 1998

24 이근우, "日本列島의 百濟 遺民에 대하여" 23 : 2001

25 大野普, "日本語の 起源" 岩波書店 1957

26 水野祐, "日本民族의 起源, In 言語 3-2" 大修書館 1974

27 坂本太郞等校注, "日本書紀下" 岩波書店 1965

28 佐伯有清, "新撰姓氏録の研究 全9巻" 吉川弘文館 1962

29 井今啓一, "攝津國百濟郡考, In 百濟王敬福" 綜藝社 1965

30 市古晃, "攝津國百濟郡の郡域と成立年代" 56 : 2000

31 奈良國立文化財硏究所, "平城京長屋王邸宅と木簡" 吉川弘文館 1991

32 直木孝次郞, "大王から天皇へ" 1987

33 直木孝次郞, "壬申の亂" 1977

34 福岡安則, "在日韓國人靑年の生活と意識" 東京大學出版會 1997

35 仁井田陞, "唐令拾遺" 東京大學出版會 1933

36 吉田晶, "古代の難波" 敎育社 1982

37 山尾幸久, "古代の日朝關係" 塙書房 1989

38 송완범, "‘百濟王氏’의 成立과 日本律令國家, In 동아시아 속의 한일관계사(상)-반도와 열도의 교류-" 고려대학교 일본사연구회 2010

39 Warner Lloyd, "The Social Systems of American Ethnic Groups" Yale University Press 1945

40 Louis Wirth, "The Problem of Minority Groups, In The Science of Man in the World Crisis" Columbia University Press 1945

41 Berry Chiswick, "The Economic Progress of Immigrants : Some Universal Patterns, In The Gateway : U.S. Immigration Issues and Policies" American Enterprise Institute 1982

42 R. Brown, "Social Identity, In The Social Science Encyclopedia, 2nd ed" Rouledge 1996

43 E. T. Olson, "Personal Identity, In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" 2002

44 S. Shoemaker, "Personal Identity, In The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy" Cambridge University Press 1995

45 Anthony D. Smith, "National Identity" Penguine Books 1991

46 Fredrik Barth, "Models of Social Organization" Royal Anthropological Institute 1966

47 Alejandro Portes and Robert Bach, "Latin Journey : Cuban and Mexican Immigrants in the United States" University of California Press 1985

48 John Hutchinson, "Ethnicity" Oxford University Press 1996

49 Fredrik Barth, "Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The social Organization of Culture Differences" Little Brown and Co 1969

50 平野邦雄, "8·9世紀における歸化人身分の再編" 292 : 1964

51 윤선태, "7~9세기 삼국인의 일본이주와 정착-고대일본의 중화의식과 귀화인 문제를 중심으로-" 해상왕장보고연구회 2 : 2003