RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    임상수행 능력평가의 환자의사 관계 항목에 대한 평가 분석 - 대화분석적 연구 - = Analysis of Criteria to Evaluate Patient Doctor Relationships in a Clinical Performance Examination - Linguistic Dialog Analysis Approach -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101590686

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Korean medical students should pass the Clinical Performance Examination (CPX) for national licensing from 2010. CPX is an assessment of the general clinical performance of students because real competent patient care is more important for a primary care physician than knowledge learned in a classroom. So we evaluated the current examination's method of assessing the patient-doctor relationship and compared it with a conversation analysis assessment method newly developed by the authors. We determined that the current examination's method of assessment rated by standardized patients in CPX is not discriminative and does not include objective evidence for the rating. The results mean that it is hard for a standardized patient who is supposed to be immersed in a simulated encounter to do an objective assessment based on the patient's short-term memory. So we suggested that the present evaluation method needs review and improvement. In the near future, we think that further studies about doctor-patient relationship assessment are needed and an experimental study should be conducted to find out how to apply and train standardized patients with the newly-developed assessment tools.
    번역하기

    Korean medical students should pass the Clinical Performance Examination (CPX) for national licensing from 2010. CPX is an assessment of the general clinical performance of students because real competent patient care is more important for a primary c...

    Korean medical students should pass the Clinical Performance Examination (CPX) for national licensing from 2010. CPX is an assessment of the general clinical performance of students because real competent patient care is more important for a primary care physician than knowledge learned in a classroom. So we evaluated the current examination's method of assessing the patient-doctor relationship and compared it with a conversation analysis assessment method newly developed by the authors. We determined that the current examination's method of assessment rated by standardized patients in CPX is not discriminative and does not include objective evidence for the rating. The results mean that it is hard for a standardized patient who is supposed to be immersed in a simulated encounter to do an objective assessment based on the patient's short-term memory. So we suggested that the present evaluation method needs review and improvement. In the near future, we think that further studies about doctor-patient relationship assessment are needed and an experimental study should be conducted to find out how to apply and train standardized patients with the newly-developed assessment tools.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박용익, "환자중심의 의료커뮤니케이션. 대화분석을 기반으로 하는 의료인의 의사소통 교육 방법론" 서울 2011

    2 박용익, "위중한 병명 통보대화" 한국텍스트언어학회 2 (2): 255-302, 2007

    3 박용익, "병명 통보대화 능력의 평가 기준 - 대화분석적 연구 -" 한국독어학회 (17) : 109-141, 2008

    4 박용익, "대화분석론" 서울 2010

    5 Koerfer, A, "Zur Evaluation von Arzt-Patient-Kommunikation Perspektiven einer angewandten Diskursethik in der Medizin, In Medizinische Kommunikation. Diskurspraxis, Diskursethik, Dis-kursanalyse" Westdeutscher Verlag 53-94, 1993

    6 Koerfer, A, "Training und Prüfung kommunikativer Kompetenz. Aus- und Fortbildungskonzepte zur ärztlichen Gesprächsführung"

    7 Silverman, J, "The Calgary- Cambridge approach to communication skills teaching 2: The SET-GO method of descriptive feedback" 16-23, 1997

    8 Kurtz, S, "Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine" Radcliffe 2005

    9 Silverman, J, "Skills for communicating with patients" Radcliff Medical Press 2004

    1 박용익, "환자중심의 의료커뮤니케이션. 대화분석을 기반으로 하는 의료인의 의사소통 교육 방법론" 서울 2011

    2 박용익, "위중한 병명 통보대화" 한국텍스트언어학회 2 (2): 255-302, 2007

    3 박용익, "병명 통보대화 능력의 평가 기준 - 대화분석적 연구 -" 한국독어학회 (17) : 109-141, 2008

    4 박용익, "대화분석론" 서울 2010

    5 Koerfer, A, "Zur Evaluation von Arzt-Patient-Kommunikation Perspektiven einer angewandten Diskursethik in der Medizin, In Medizinische Kommunikation. Diskurspraxis, Diskursethik, Dis-kursanalyse" Westdeutscher Verlag 53-94, 1993

    6 Koerfer, A, "Training und Prüfung kommunikativer Kompetenz. Aus- und Fortbildungskonzepte zur ärztlichen Gesprächsführung"

    7 Silverman, J, "The Calgary- Cambridge approach to communication skills teaching 2: The SET-GO method of descriptive feedback" 16-23, 1997

    8 Kurtz, S, "Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine" Radcliffe 2005

    9 Silverman, J, "Skills for communicating with patients" Radcliff Medical Press 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2024 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2017-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2006-12-12 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Health Communication Society -> Korean Academy on Communication in Healthcare
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.44 0.44 0.44
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.52 0.53 0.796 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼