RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Korean college students’ vocabulary profiles as predictors of English reading and writing proficiency

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104110090

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The present study aims to identify the association between Korean students’ vocabulary profiles and their reading and writing proficiency. For the purpose of the study, 107 college students from two universities in Seoul were asked to write an argumentative essay on the following two topics: English Only Classes (EOC) and the Additional Point System for conscripts (APS). In addition to the writing tasks, the students took a reading comprehension test. Then based on their scores on the reading test, the students were assigned to a high proficiency group (n=17) or a low proficiency group (n=17). The students were also classified into a high (n=26) or a low proficiency group (n=29) based on their performance on the first writing task (EOC). A Lexical Frequency Profile (LFP) was then used as a measure of vocabulary knowledge to examine the relationship with other variables, such as writing topic, writing proficiency, and reading proficiency. The findings indicate that the students’ written essays on the two topics displayed significantly different vocabulary profiles. Interestingly, the students’ vocabulary profiles did not differ according to their writing proficiency whereas their use of academic words differed according to their reading proficiency. The findings are discussed in greater detail, along with pedagogical implications.
      번역하기

      The present study aims to identify the association between Korean students’ vocabulary profiles and their reading and writing proficiency. For the purpose of the study, 107 college students from two universities in Seoul were asked to write an argum...

      The present study aims to identify the association between Korean students’ vocabulary profiles and their reading and writing proficiency. For the purpose of the study, 107 college students from two universities in Seoul were asked to write an argumentative essay on the following two topics: English Only Classes (EOC) and the Additional Point System for conscripts (APS). In addition to the writing tasks, the students took a reading comprehension test. Then based on their scores on the reading test, the students were assigned to a high proficiency group (n=17) or a low proficiency group (n=17). The students were also classified into a high (n=26) or a low proficiency group (n=29) based on their performance on the first writing task (EOC). A Lexical Frequency Profile (LFP) was then used as a measure of vocabulary knowledge to examine the relationship with other variables, such as writing topic, writing proficiency, and reading proficiency. The findings indicate that the students’ written essays on the two topics displayed significantly different vocabulary profiles. Interestingly, the students’ vocabulary profiles did not differ according to their writing proficiency whereas their use of academic words differed according to their reading proficiency. The findings are discussed in greater detail, along with pedagogical implications.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Laufer, B., "What’s in a word that makes it hard or easy: Some intralexical factors that affect the learning of words in : Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy" Cambridge University Press 140-180, 1997

      2 Laufer, B., "Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production" 16 : 307-322, 1995

      3 Morris, L., "Vocabulary profiles as predictors of the academic performance of Teaching English as a Second Language trainees" 32 : 75-78, 2004

      4 Cobb, T., "VocabProfile program [computer software]"

      5 Lee, H., "Validity and topic generality of a writing performance test" 24 : 307-330, 2007

      6 Lee, H., "The relationship between writer’s perceptions and their performance on a field-specific writing test" 13 : 93-110, 2008

      7 Laufer, B., "The lexical profile of second language writing: Does it change over time?" 25 : 21-33, 1994

      8 Koda, K., "The effects of transferring vocabulary knowledge on the development of L2 reading proficiency" 22 : 529-540, 1989

      9 Laufer, B., "The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same of different?" 19 : 255-271, 1998

      10 Laufer. B., "The development of L2 lexis in the expression of the advanced learner" 75 : 440-448, 1991

      1 Laufer, B., "What’s in a word that makes it hard or easy: Some intralexical factors that affect the learning of words in : Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy" Cambridge University Press 140-180, 1997

      2 Laufer, B., "Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production" 16 : 307-322, 1995

      3 Morris, L., "Vocabulary profiles as predictors of the academic performance of Teaching English as a Second Language trainees" 32 : 75-78, 2004

      4 Cobb, T., "VocabProfile program [computer software]"

      5 Lee, H., "Validity and topic generality of a writing performance test" 24 : 307-330, 2007

      6 Lee, H., "The relationship between writer’s perceptions and their performance on a field-specific writing test" 13 : 93-110, 2008

      7 Laufer, B., "The lexical profile of second language writing: Does it change over time?" 25 : 21-33, 1994

      8 Koda, K., "The effects of transferring vocabulary knowledge on the development of L2 reading proficiency" 22 : 529-540, 1989

      9 Laufer, B., "The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same of different?" 19 : 255-271, 1998

      10 Laufer. B., "The development of L2 lexis in the expression of the advanced learner" 75 : 440-448, 1991

      11 Nation, P., "Testing and teaching vocabulary" 5 : 12-25, 1983

      12 Laufer, B., "Size and strength: Do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge?" 21 : 202-226, 2004

      13 Reid, J., "Responding to different topic types: A quantitative analysis from a contrastive rhetoric perspective in : Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom" Longman 191-210, 1990

      14 Laufer, B., "Relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context" 48 : 365-391, 1998

      15 Muncie, J., "Process writing and vocabulary development: Comparing Lexical Frequency Profiles across drafts" 30 : 225-235, 2002

      16 Nation, P., "Learning vocabulary in another language" Cambridge University Press 2001

      17 Cho, D., "Hackers TOEFL reading" Hackers Language Institute 2002

      18 Lee, S. I., "From receptive to productive: Improving ESL learners’ use of vocabulary in a postreading comprehension task" 40 : 295-320, 2006

      19 Tedick, D., "ESL writing assessment: Subject-matter knowledge and its impact on performance" 9 : 123-143, 1990

      20 Polio, C., "ESL writing assessment prompts: How students choose" 5 : 35-49, 1996

      21 Lee, S. H., "ESL learners’ vocabulary use in writing and the effects of explicit vocabulary instruction" 31 : 537-561, 2003

      22 Qian, D. D., "Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension" 56 : 282-308, 1999

      23 Wesche, M., "Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breath" 53 : 13-40, 1996

      24 Astika, G., "Analytical assessment of foreign students’ writing" 24 : 61-72, 1993

      25 Laufer, B., "A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability" 16 : 36-55, 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-10-02 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Association of Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-07-27 학술지등록 한글명 : 멀티미디어 언어교육
      외국어명 : Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.23 1.23 1.13
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.13 0.99 1.483 0.26
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼