The rules of criminal conversation in relation to right to sexual autonomy must protect the protection benefit of the criminal conversation by a property distribution right of claim in the civil law or a claim for damages by illegal behavior that is n...
The rules of criminal conversation in relation to right to sexual autonomy must protect the protection benefit of the criminal conversation by a property distribution right of claim in the civil law or a claim for damages by illegal behavior that is not criminal punishment. Therefore, the rules of criminal conversation will be said to be an unconstitutionality rule to infringe a personal right to sexual autonomy in violation of a principle of balancing test. Thus, future our country must abolish a rules of criminal conversation in the criminal law. On the other hand, it is proper to consider a degree of violence and threat in a rape rule by all acts to violate sexual free will of a rape victim. Because the protection benefit of a rape rule protects a right to sexual autonomy of a rape victim. Therefore, it is not proper to consider a degree of violence and threat in a rape rule by an action of a rape assailant is able to put resistance of a victim in impossibility or considerably difficult of resistance of a rape victim like an opinion of the supreme court. Thus, future our country must revise a rape rule in the criminal law to punish it in time rape to violate sincere intention of sex refusal of a rape victim.