RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Institutional Choice and Change in Regional Partnerships for County Economic Development = 카운티 경제발전을 위한 지역 간 파트너십의 제도적 선택과 변동

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100055210

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      지방정부들은 그들이 속한 환경 속에서 경제발전을 증진시키기 위한 지역 간 다양한 파트너십을 형성해 오고 있다. 2009년 미국의 카운티 정부를 대상으로 실시한 설문조사 결과, 약 80%의 카운티 정부들은 지역 협의체(조직)를 통한 파트너십에 동참하고 있으며, 통계 분석 결과, 개혁된 카운티 정부형태와 타 정부 간 긴밀한 네트워크 구조가 경제발전을 위한 지역 간 파트너십을 형성하는데 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 지역개발론자들의 세력이 강한 카운티와 개혁된 조직형태를 가지는 카운티 정부가 지난 10년간 새롭게 지역 간 파트너십을 형성해 왔음을 보여주었다.
      번역하기

      지방정부들은 그들이 속한 환경 속에서 경제발전을 증진시키기 위한 지역 간 다양한 파트너십을 형성해 오고 있다. 2009년 미국의 카운티 정부를 대상으로 실시한 설문조사 결과, 약 80%의 카...

      지방정부들은 그들이 속한 환경 속에서 경제발전을 증진시키기 위한 지역 간 다양한 파트너십을 형성해 오고 있다. 2009년 미국의 카운티 정부를 대상으로 실시한 설문조사 결과, 약 80%의 카운티 정부들은 지역 협의체(조직)를 통한 파트너십에 동참하고 있으며, 통계 분석 결과, 개혁된 카운티 정부형태와 타 정부 간 긴밀한 네트워크 구조가 경제발전을 위한 지역 간 파트너십을 형성하는데 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 지역개발론자들의 세력이 강한 카운티와 개혁된 조직형태를 가지는 카운티 정부가 지난 10년간 새롭게 지역 간 파트너십을 형성해 왔음을 보여주었다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Local governments have made regional partnership for promoting economic condition in the larger institutional environments in which they are embedded. With 500 respondents of the survey for statistical analyses, in 2009, about 80% of county governments joined in partnerships through the regional organizations in U.S. The analysis indicates that a reformed form of government, and a closer inter-local network are positively related with participating in the regional partnerships. Also, a specific interest (pro-development Interest) and a reformed form of government have made the county governments affiliate with the regional organizations for economic development between 1999 and 2009.
      번역하기

      Local governments have made regional partnership for promoting economic condition in the larger institutional environments in which they are embedded. With 500 respondents of the survey for statistical analyses, in 2009, about 80% of county government...

      Local governments have made regional partnership for promoting economic condition in the larger institutional environments in which they are embedded. With 500 respondents of the survey for statistical analyses, in 2009, about 80% of county governments joined in partnerships through the regional organizations in U.S. The analysis indicates that a reformed form of government, and a closer inter-local network are positively related with participating in the regional partnerships. Also, a specific interest (pro-development Interest) and a reformed form of government have made the county governments affiliate with the regional organizations for economic development between 1999 and 2009.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Local Economic Development and Partnership in Regional Organizations
      • Ⅲ. Theoretical Approach
      • Ⅳ. Research Design
      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Local Economic Development and Partnership in Regional Organizations
      • Ⅲ. Theoretical Approach
      • Ⅳ. Research Design
      • Ⅴ. Statistical Findings
      • Ⅵ. Conclusions and Implications
      • References
      • 국문요약
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 채경진, "What Influences Inter-local Government Cooperation in Korea?" 한국지방정부학회 16 (16): 227-246, 2012

      2 Cochrane, R., "Understanding Local Economic Development in a Comparative Context" 6 (6): 406-417, 1992

      3 Green, G. P., "The Role of Local Development Organization in Rural America" 67 (67): 394-415, 2002

      4 Reese, L. A., "The Role of Counties in Local Economic Development" 8 (8): 28-42, 1996

      5 Hannan, M. T., "The Population Ecology of Organizations" 82 (82): 929-964, 1977

      6 Clark, S. E., "The Next Wave: Local Economic Development Strategies in the Post-federal Era" 6 : 187-198, 1992

      7 Lee, I. W., "The Influence of Actor Attributes and Social Relations on Game Transition: Formal Model and Empirical Analysis of Collective Action and Collaborative Economic Development Policy" Florida State University 2009

      8 Fleishmann, A., "The Goals and Strategies of Local Boundary Changes: Governments Organization or Private Gain" 8 (8): 63-75, 1986

      9 National Association of Regional Councils, "The Future of Regionalism in United States: Special Report 128" National Association of Regional Council 1987

      10 Olberding, J. C., "The Formation, Structure and Processes, and Performance of Regional Partnerships for Economic Development in U.S. Metropolitan Area" University of Kentucky 2000

      1 채경진, "What Influences Inter-local Government Cooperation in Korea?" 한국지방정부학회 16 (16): 227-246, 2012

      2 Cochrane, R., "Understanding Local Economic Development in a Comparative Context" 6 (6): 406-417, 1992

      3 Green, G. P., "The Role of Local Development Organization in Rural America" 67 (67): 394-415, 2002

      4 Reese, L. A., "The Role of Counties in Local Economic Development" 8 (8): 28-42, 1996

      5 Hannan, M. T., "The Population Ecology of Organizations" 82 (82): 929-964, 1977

      6 Clark, S. E., "The Next Wave: Local Economic Development Strategies in the Post-federal Era" 6 : 187-198, 1992

      7 Lee, I. W., "The Influence of Actor Attributes and Social Relations on Game Transition: Formal Model and Empirical Analysis of Collective Action and Collaborative Economic Development Policy" Florida State University 2009

      8 Fleishmann, A., "The Goals and Strategies of Local Boundary Changes: Governments Organization or Private Gain" 8 (8): 63-75, 1986

      9 National Association of Regional Councils, "The Future of Regionalism in United States: Special Report 128" National Association of Regional Council 1987

      10 Olberding, J. C., "The Formation, Structure and Processes, and Performance of Regional Partnerships for Economic Development in U.S. Metropolitan Area" University of Kentucky 2000

      11 Gray, V., "The Corporatist Foundations of State Industrial Policy" 71 (71): 3-24, 1990

      12 Donaldson, L., "The Contingency Theory of Organizations" Sage Publications 2001

      13 Coleman. S., "Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital" 94 : 95-121, 1988

      14 Kwon, S. W., "Regional Organization and Inter-local Cooperation among Florida Cities" Florida State University 2008

      15 Feiock, R. C., "Regional Choice and Regional Governance" 29 (29): 49-65, 2007

      16 Feiock, R. C., "Regional Choice and Regional Governance" 29 (29): 49-65, 2007

      17 O'Toole L. J., "Public Management in Intergovernmental Networks: Matching Structural Networks and Managerial Networking" 14 (14): 469-494, 2004

      18 Clark, S. E., "Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis" Congressional Quarterly Press 1996

      19 McCormick, R. E., "Politicians, Legislation, and the Economy" Martinus Nijhoff Publishing 1982

      20 Blakely, J., "Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice" SAGE Publication 1994

      21 Podolny, M., "Network Forms of Organization" 24 : 57-76, 1998

      22 McCabe, Barbara, "Nested Levels of Institutions: State Rules and City Property Taxes" 40 (40): 634-654, 2005

      23 Reese, L. A., "Municipal Fiscal Health and Tax Abatement Policy" 5 : 23-32, 1991

      24 Robinson, C. J., "Municipal Approach to Economic Development: Growth and Distribution Policy" 55 : 283-295, 1989

      25 Agranoff, R., "Multinetwork Management: Collaboration and the Hollow State in Local Economic Policy" 8 (8): 67-91, 1998

      26 Clark, S. E., "Moving towards Entrepreneurial State and Local Development Strategies, Opportunities and Barriers" 17 : 574-598, 1989

      27 Reese. L. A., "More of the Same: A Research Note on Local Economic Development Policies over Time" 10 : 280-289, 1996

      28 Feiock, R. C., "Metropolitan Governance and Institutional Collective Action" 44 (44): 356-377, 2009

      29 Jeong, M., "Local Land Use Choices: An Empirical Investigation of Development Impact Fees in Florida" Florida State University 2004

      30 Feiock, R. C., "Is the World “Flat” or “Spiky”? Rethinking the Governance Implications of Globalization for Economic Development" 68 (68): 24-35, 2008

      31 Nicholson-Crotty, S., "Interest Group Influence on Managerial Priorities in Public Organizations" 14 (14): 571-583, 2004

      32 Feiock, R. C., "Institutional Collective Action and Economic Development Joint Ventures" 69 (69): 256-270, 2009

      33 Pammer. W. J., "Economic Development Strategies among Counties" The University of Alabama Press 1996

      34 Provan, K. G., "Do Network Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-sector Organizational Networks" 64 (64): 414-423, 2001

      35 Olberding, J. C., "Diving into the 'Third Waves' of Regional Governance Strategies: A Study of Regional Partnerships for Economic Development in U.S. Metropolitan Areas" 16 : 251-272, 2002

      36 Gerber, E. R., "Direct Democracy and Land Use Policy: Exchanging Public Goods for Development Rights" 41 (41): 463-479, 2004

      37 Feiock, R C., "Credible Commitment and Council-manager Government: Implications for Policy Instrument Choices" 63 (63): 616-625, 2003

      38 Benton, E., "County Service Delivery: Does Government Structure Matter?" 62 (62): 471-479, 2002

      39 Williamson, O. E., "Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives" 36 : 269-296, 1991

      40 Nickerson J. A., "Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice" 13 (13): 547-566, 2002

      41 Gujarati, D. N., "Basic Econometrics" The McGrow Hill 2003

      42 Benton, E., "An Assessment of Research on American Counties" 65 (65): 462-474, 2005

      43 Clingermayer. J. C., "Adoption of Economic Development Policies by Large Cities: A Test of Economic, Interest Group, and Institutional Explanations" 18 : 539-552, 1990

      44 Andre, R., "A National Study of Economic Development Organizations at the State Level: The Key Organizations, Their Industrial Constituencies, and Their Networks" 8 (8): 292-301, 1994

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.27 1.27 1.23
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.34 1.4 1.372 0.54
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼