This study analyzed how the decision process was made on the correction items of Jeongjojeong and Jeongbaeggwan in the Daehagyeonuibo that appeared in Yuuipyeongrye using literature and actual research. Regarding the items, the details and results of ...
This study analyzed how the decision process was made on the correction items of Jeongjojeong and Jeongbaeggwan in the Daehagyeonuibo that appeared in Yuuipyeongrye using literature and actual research. Regarding the items, the details and results of the correction were synthesized by comparing them with the records of the Daehagyeonuibo and the Eojeongdaehagyuui.
4 vols of Jeongjeong (vol. 1 to 4) is the general discussion of the yugbu and contains 6 lists. vol. 1 Conglonjojeongjijeong, vol. 2 Jeongganggisang, jeongmyeongbunjideung, vol.3 Gongsangbeoljisi, Geunholyeongjiban Vol. 4 Gwangjineonjiro, etc. 8 vols of Jeongbaekgwan (vol. 8 to 12) corresponds to the Ibu of the Yugbu and contains 11 lists. vol. 5 Chongnonimgwanjido and Jeongjiggwanjipum, vol. 6 Banjaknokjije and Gyeongdaeshinjirye, vol. 7 Ganshi Jongjishin, vol. 8 Jungdaeganjiim, vol. 9 Cheongipsajiro, vol. 10 Gongjeonseonjibeop, vol. 11 Eomgogwajibeop and Sungchucheonjido, vol. 12 Gyenamyongjisil etc.
The contents and results of the the correction are 1) the correction items of Jeongjojeong in the Daehagyeonuibo is Yuuipyeongrye, vol. 1, 8 cheom 4 items. The comments of Kwak, Ong, So, Cheol, O, Jing and Sa, Ryang-jwa were all deleted. All of the explanations of ‘以上總論朝廷之政’ in Gu, Jun’s comment, which summarized the main points of Chigugpyeongcheonha were all included. 2) the correction items of Jeongbaekgwan is in the Daehagyeonuibo is Yuuipyeongrye, vol. 1, 9 cheom 26 items. First, 7 cases of selected content were included with Lim, Ji-gi’s commentary, Yug, Jj’s tests were excerpted, and all notes of Ho, In were omitted. Some of Gu, Jun’s proposals were excerpted or omitted. In some cases, Jeongjo’s final decision was not reflected. Second, in 10 cases of addition of contents, the comments of Lim, Ji-gi were included, the claims of Sama, Gwang were reflected, and the comments of Gong, Yeong-dal were omitted. The text and Gu, Jun’s comments were also partially adjusted. Third, in the 4 cases of content adjustment, the annotations on Jin, Bu-yang and Chae, chim were omitted, and the items of Sa, Jeom were adjusted under the Pilmyeongpyeon. Fourth, in the case of deletion of content, the main text was adjusted, Gu, Jun’s commentary was selected, and comments by Ho, An-guk, Yeo, Jo-gyeom, and Jin, Bu-ryang were all deleted. Fifth, one letter correction was changed to ‘以上中書舍人’ to ‘此中書舍人’ in the last line of Gu, Jun’s commentary.